Clinical experience on mycobacterial diseases other than tuberculos- is / 결핵

No abstract available.

Direct coronal computed tomography of the body

Direct coronal CT scans of the body have been carried out in 78 cases of the thoracic and abdnominal diseases. The results are as follows: 1. Among total 78 patients, 66 cases were successfully scanned by the direct coronal CT. 2. Direct co ronal CT scan most accurately detected retroperitoneal diseases, especially renal diseases. 3. In comparison with multiplanar reformating (MPR) image, direct coronal CT of the body has three advantages: (a) improved image quality: (b) improved definition of the coronal anatomy : (c) shorter examination time. 4. Direct coronal CT has advantages in evaluation of the mass nature and relationship with other organs. 5. Disadvantages or limitations of the direct coronal CT are as follows: in creased radiation exposure and insufficient positioning for disabled patients. 6. In our experience, direct coronal CT is considered as helpful method for presurgical evaluation and the rapeutic management of various diseases, especially gross tumor of the retroperitoneum.

The diagnostic value of computed tomography in obstructive jaundice

Computed tomographic (CT) scans of 46 jaundiced patients were studied to determine the value of CT in the diagnosis of biliary pathology. AII ofthe 12 cases of medical jaundice had positive CT correlation. Of the 34 cases of proven surgical jaundice, 97 .8% were correctly identified by CT. In detecting the level of obstruction, the cases were divided into four groups by anatomica l segments, according to the number of visualized low density ringlike structures produced by dilated bile duct. All of the correctly diagnosed surgical jaundice was 91.2%. The presence of stones or mass, the level of obstruction and the relative size and shape of visualized distal ring had proved to be the most important variables in etiological diagnosis of surgical jaundice. The results indicate that CT is useful and highly accurate in differenting between surgical (obstructive) jaundice and medical (non-obstructive) ajundice, and determining the level of obstruction and the etiology of surgical jaundice.