[COVID-19 and arrhythmias]. / COVID-19 et troubles du rythme.

In the pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV2 virus, arrhythmias were not in the foreground. However, the virus seems to affect many organs and the cardiac tropism is now well known. Knowledge in this area is still far from exhaustive, but several series published concerning patients with COVID-19 find a significant proportion of arrhythmias, some of which can potentially lead to a fatal outcome. These rhythm disorders are mainly supraventricular, such as atrial fibrillation (AF) or flutter but also ventricular disorders like ventricular tachycardias (VT) ventricular fibrillation (VF) and more rarely torsades de pointe (TdP). The causes are multiple, due to the multiorgan damage caused by the virus and potential drug interactions. In addition, the question of monitoring rhythm disorders that may emerge in the medium and long term after an infection remains to be explored.

[Infections in interventional electrophysiology]. / Infections en rythmologie interventionnelle.

The implantation of pacemakers and defibrillators carries the highest risk of infection in interventional electrophysiology. The use of implantable cardiac devices is continually increasing with almost 2 million devices implanted worldwide each year. The recipients' profile may also be associated with an increased risk of infection. Several measures can be implemented to reduce the risk of device-related infection. Systematic antibiotic prophylaxis has proven to be beneficial provided that prescription modalities are respected, especially with respect to the selection of the appropriate molecule and timing of administration prior to the procedure. Despite all the precautions taken during surgery (asepsis, prophylactic antibiotic therapy….) the estimated rate of peri-procedural infection is around 2%. Device related infections are associated with a high rate of morbidity and mortality as well as substantial healthcare costs. Staphylococcus aureus (SA) and epidermidis (SE) are the pathogenic agents involved in most cases. Prevention is crucial given the difficulties in treating such infections because of the near-systematic need to remove the device and antibiotic resistance. Leadless pacemakers and subcutaneous defibrillators are potential alternatives to implantable endocardial devices, albeit with certain limitations. A group of experts has recently issued consensus paper on the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of infections associated with endocardial implantable cardiac devices.