Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 18 de 18
Filter
2.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 11(24): 2495-2503, 2018 12 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30503596

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study compares 30-day, 1-year, and 3-year echocardiographic findings and clinical outcomes of transcatheter pulmonary valve-in-valve replacement (TPVR) and repeat surgical pulmonary valve replacement (SPVR). BACKGROUND: In patients with adult congenital heart disease and previous pulmonary valve replacement (PVR) who require redo PVR, it is unclear whether TPVR or repeat SPVR is the preferred strategy. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 66 patients (TPVR, n = 36; SPVR, n = 30) with bioprosthetic pulmonary valves (PVs) who underwent either TPVR or repeat SPVR at Emory Healthcare from January 2007 to August 2017. RESULTS: The TPVR cohort had fewer men and more patients with baseline New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III or IV. There was no difference in mortality, cardiovascular readmission, or post-procedural PV reintervention at 30 days, 1 year, or 3 years. Post-procedural echocardiographic findings showed no difference in mean PV gradients between the TPVR and SPVR groups at 30 days, 1 year, or 3 years. In the TPVR cohort, there was less right ventricular dysfunction at 30 days (2.9% vs. 46.7%; p < 0.01), despite higher baseline NYHA functional class in the SPVR cohort. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with bioprosthetic PV dysfunction who underwent either TPVR or SPVR, there was no difference in mortality, cardiovascular readmission, or repeat PV intervention at 30 days, 1 year, or 3 years. Additionally, TPVR and SPVR had similar intermediate-term PV longevity, with no difference in PV gradients or PVR. The TPVR cohort also had less right ventricular dysfunction at 30 days despite a higher baseline NYHA functional classification. These intermediate-term results suggest that TPVR may be an attractive alternative to SPVR in patients with previous bioprosthetic surgical PVs.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Catheterization , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Pulmonary Valve/surgery , Adult , Bioprosthesis , Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects , Cardiac Catheterization/instrumentation , Cardiac Catheterization/mortality , Echocardiography , Female , Georgia , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Hemodynamics , Humans , Male , Prosthesis Design , Prosthesis Failure , Pulmonary Valve/diagnostic imaging , Pulmonary Valve/physiopathology , Recovery of Function , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Ventricular Function, Right , Young Adult
5.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 11(12): 1131-1138, 2018 06 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29929633

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: There are minimal data regarding clinical outcomes and echocardiographic findings after transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve replacement (TMVR) compared with redo surgical mitral valve replacement (SMVR). BACKGROUND: TMVR therapy has emerged as therapy for a degenerated bioprosthetic valve failure. METHODS: The authors retrospectively identified patients with degenerated mitral bioprostheses who underwent redo SMVR or TMVR at 3 U.S. institutions. The authors compared clinical and echocardiographic outcomes of patients who had TMVR with those of patients who underwent redo SMVR. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients underwent TMVR and 59 patients underwent SMVR during the study period. Mean age and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality (STS PROM) scores were significantly higher in patients with TMVR than in those with SMVR (age 74.9 ± 9.4 years vs. 63.7 ± 14.9 years; p < 0.001; STS PROM 12.7 ± 8.0% vs. 8.7 ± 10.1%; p < 0.0001). Total procedure time, intensive care unit hours, and post-procedure length of stay were all significantly shorter in the TMVR group. There was no difference in mortality at 1 year between the 2 groups (TMVR 11.3% vs. SMVR 11.9%; p = 0.92). Mean mitral valve pressure gradient and the grade of mitral regurgitation (MR) were similar between the TMVR group and the SMVR group (mitral valve pressure gradient 7.1 ± 2.5 mm Hg vs. 6.5 ± 2.5 mm Hg; p = 0.42; MR [≥moderate] 3.8% vs. 5.6%; p = 1.00) at 30 days. At 1 year, the mitral valve pressure gradient was higher in the TMVR group (TMVR 7.2 ± 2.7 vs. SMVR 5.5 ± 1.8; p = 0.01), although there was no difference in the grade of MR. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the higher STS PROM in TMVR patients, there was no difference in 1-year mortality between the TMVR and SMVR groups. Echocardiographic findings after TMVR were similar to SMVR at 30 days. There was a statistically significant difference in mitral gradient at 1 year, though this is likely not clinically important. TMVR may be an alternative to SMVR in patients with previous mitral bioprosthetic valves.


Subject(s)
Bioprosthesis , Cardiac Catheterization/instrumentation , Device Removal , Echocardiography , Heart Valve Diseases/surgery , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Mitral Valve/surgery , Prosthesis Failure , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects , Cardiac Catheterization/mortality , Device Removal/adverse effects , Device Removal/mortality , Female , Heart Valve Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Heart Valve Diseases/physiopathology , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mitral Valve/diagnostic imaging , Mitral Valve/physiopathology , Predictive Value of Tests , Recovery of Function , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States
7.
CMAJ ; 190(13): E380-E388, 2018 04 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29615421

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Radial artery access is commonly performed for coronary angiography and invasive hemodynamic monitoring. Despite limitations in diagnostic accuracy, the modified Allen test (manual occlusion of radial and ulnar arteries followed by release of the latter and assessment of palmar blush) is used routinely to evaluate the collateral circulation to the hand and, therefore, to determine patient eligibility for radial artery access. We sought to evaluate whether a smartphone application may provide a superior alternative to the modified Allen test. METHODS: We compared the modified Allen test with a smartphone heart rate-monitoring application (photoplethysmography readings detected using a smartphone camera lens placed on the patient's index finger) in patients undergoing a planned cardiac catheterization. Test order was randomly assigned in a 1:1 fashion. All patients then underwent conventional plethysmography of the index finger, followed by Doppler ultrasonography of the radial and ulnar arteries (the diagnostic standard). The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy of the heart rate-monitoring application. RESULTS: Among 438 patients who were included in the study, we found that the heart rate-monitoring application had a superior diagnostic accuracy compared with the modified Allen test (91.8% v. 81.7%, p = 0.002), attributable to its greater specificity (93.0% v. 82.8%, p = 0.001). We also found that this application had greater diagnostic accuracy for assessment of radial or ulnar artery patency in the ipsilateral and contralateral wrist (94.0% v. 84.0%, p < 0.001). INTERPRETATION: A smartphone application used at the bedside was diagnostically superior to traditional physical examination for confirming ulnar patency before radial artery access. This study highlights the potential for smartphone-based diagnostics to aid in clinical decision-making at the patient's bedside. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, no. NCT02519491.


Subject(s)
Mobile Applications , Photoplethysmography/instrumentation , Ulnar Artery/physiology , Vascular Patency/physiology , Aged , Female , Hand/blood supply , Heart Rate/physiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Radial Artery/physiology , Smartphone
9.
PLoS One ; 13(4): e0195641, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29698407

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) reduces left ventricular (LV) afterload and improves prognosis in aortic stenosis (AS) patients. However, LV afterload consists of both valvular and arterial loads, and the benefits of TAVR may be attenuated if the arterial load dominates. We proposed a new hemodynamic index, the Relative Valve Load (RVL), a ratio of mean gradient (MG) and valvuloarterial impedance (Zva), to describe the relative contribution of the valvular load to the global LV load, and examined whether RVL predicted patient outcome following TAVR. METHODS: A total of 258 patients with symptomatic severe AS (indexed aortic valve area (AVA)<0.6cm2/m2, AR≤2+) underwent successful TAVR at the University of Ottawa Heart Institute and had clinical follow-up to 1-year post-TAVR. Pre-TAVR MG, AVA, percent stroke work loss (%SWL), Zva and RVL were measured by echocardiography. The primary endpoint was all cause mortality at 1-year post TAVR. RESULTS: There were 53 deaths (20.5%) at 1-year. RVL≤7.95ml/m2 had a sensitivity of 60.4% and specificity of 75.1% for identifying all cause mortality at 1-year post-TAVR and provided better specificity than MG<40 mmHg, AVA>0.75cm2, %SWL≤25% and Zva>5mmHg/ml/m2 despite equivalent or better sensitivity. In multivariable Cox analysis, RVL≤7.95ml/m2 was an independent predictor of all cause mortality (HR 3.2, CI 1.8-5.9; p<0.0001). RVL≤7.95ml/m2 was predictive of all cause mortality in both low flow and normal flow severe AS. CONCLUSIONS: RVL is a strong predictor of all-cause mortality in severe AS patients undergoing TAVR. A pre-procedural RVL≤7.95ml/m2 identifies AS patients at increased risk of death despite TAVR and may assist with decision making on the benefits of TAVR.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Aortic Valve/surgery , Echocardiography , Hemodynamics , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve/physiopathology , Aortic Valve Stenosis/mortality , Aortic Valve Stenosis/physiopathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Sensitivity and Specificity , Severity of Illness Index , Ventricular Function, Left/physiology
10.
Circ J ; 82(3): 895-902, 2018 02 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29311499

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the standard of care for management of high-risk patients with aortic stenosis. Limited data is available regarding the performance of TAVI in patients with native aortic valve regurgitation (NAVR).Methods and Results:We performed a systematic review from 2002 to 2016. The primary outcome was device success as per VARC-2 criteria. Secondary endpoints included procedural complications, and 30-day and 1-year mortality rates. A total of 175 patients were included from 31 studies. Device success was reported in 86.3% of patients - with device failure driven by moderate aortic regurgitation (AR ≥3+) and/or need for a second device. Procedural complications were rare, with no procedural deaths, myocardial infarctions or annular ruptures reported. Procedural safety was acceptable with a low 30-day incidence of stroke (1.5%). The 30-day and 1-year overall mortality rates were 9.6% and 20.0% (cardiovascular death, 3.8% and 10.1%, respectively). Patients receiving 2nd-generation valves demonstrated similar safety profiles with greater device success compared with 1st-generation valves (96.2% vs. 78.4%). This was driven by the higher incidence of second-valve implantation (23.4% vs. 1.7%) and significant paravalvular leak (8.3% vs. 0.0%). CONCLUSIONS: TAVI demonstrates acceptable safety and efficacy in high-risk patients with severe NAVR. Second-generation valves may afford a similar safety profile with improved device success. Dedicated studies are needed to definitively establish the efficacy of TAVI in this population.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Equipment and Supplies/standards , Humans , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/standards , Treatment Outcome
11.
Clin Invest Med ; 40(6): E243-E251, 2017 12 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29256390

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Acute kidney injury occurs in up to a quarter of patients following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and has been associated with increased short and long-term mortality rates. A variety of patient characteristics predictive of post-TAVR acute kidney injury (AKI) have been identified, however discrepancies among studies exist almost uniformly. We investigated the hypothesis that the change in glomerular filtration rate (ΔGFR) in response to contrast administered during pre-TAVR coronary angiography is predictive of ΔGFR post-TAVR. METHODS: The study comprised 195 patients who underwent TAVR at a single center between August 2008 and June 2015 and were prospectively included in the CAPITAL TAVR registry. Multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to estimate the effect of independent variables on the change in renal function post-TAVR. RESULTS: There was no relationship identified between the ΔGFR post-angiogram and the ΔGFR post-TAVR (r=0.043, P=0.582). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that a significant amount of the change in renal function post-TAVR can be explained by the patient's baseline creatinine (beta coefficient, -0.310, P.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/diagnosis , Aortic Valve/surgery , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Acute Kidney Injury/etiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Glomerular Filtration Rate/physiology , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
12.
Stem Cells Int ; 2017: 8270498, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28232850

ABSTRACT

Coronary revascularization remains the standard treatment for obstructive coronary artery disease and can be accomplished by either percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Considerable advances have rendered PCI the most common form of revascularization and improved clinical outcomes. However, numerous challenges to modern PCI remain, namely, in-stent restenosis and stent thrombosis, underscoring the importance of understanding the vessel wall response to injury to identify targets for intervention. Among recent promising discoveries, endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) have garnered considerable interest given an increasing appreciation of their role in vascular homeostasis and their ability to promote vascular repair after stent placement. Circulating EPC numbers have been inversely correlated with cardiovascular risk, while administration of EPCs in humans has demonstrated improved clinical outcomes. Despite these encouraging results, however, advancing EPCs as a therapeutic modality has been hampered by a fundamental roadblock: what constitutes an EPC? We review current definitions and sources of EPCs as well as the proposed mechanisms of EPC-mediated vascular repair. Additionally, we discuss the current state of EPCs as therapeutic agents, focusing on endogenous augmentation and transplantation.

13.
Resuscitation ; 113: 27-32, 2017 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28109998

ABSTRACT

AIM OF THE STUDY: We sought to assess the relationship between mean arterial pressure (MAP) and clinical outcomes in comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). METHODS: We identified consecutive comatose survivors of OHCA with an initial shockable rhythm treated with targeted temperature management. We examined clinical outcomes in relation to mean MAP (measured hourly) during the first 96h of hospitalization. Co-primary outcomes were the rates of death and severe neurological dysfunction at discharge. RESULTS: In 122 patients meeting inclusion criteria, death occurred in 29 (24%) and severe neurological dysfunction in 39 (32%). Higher mean MAPs were associated with lower odds of death (OR 0.55 per 5mmHg increase; 95%CI 0.38-0.79; p=0.002) and severe neurological dysfunction (OR 0.66 per 5mmHg increase; 95%CI 0.48-0.90; p=0.01). After adjustment for differences in patient, index event, and treatment characteristics, higher mean MAPs remained associated with lower odds of death (OR 0.60 per 5mmHg increase; 95%CI 0.40-0.89; p=0.01) but not severe neurological dysfunction (OR 0.73 per 5mmHg increase; 95%CI 0.51-1.03; p=0.07). The relationship between mean MAP and the odds of death (p-interaction=0.03) and severe neurological dysfunction (p-interaction=0.03) was attenuated by increased patient age. CONCLUSION: In comatose survivors of OHCA treated with target temperature management, a higher mean MAP during the first 96h of admission is associated with increased survival. The association between mean MAP and clinical outcomes appears to be attenuated by increased age.


Subject(s)
Arterial Pressure , Blood Pressure Determination , Coma , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest , Aged , Blood Pressure Determination/methods , Blood Pressure Determination/statistics & numerical data , Canada/epidemiology , Coma/etiology , Coma/physiopathology , Coma/therapy , Female , Humans , Hypothermia, Induced/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Nervous System Diseases/etiology , Nervous System Diseases/prevention & control , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/complications , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/epidemiology , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Survivors/statistics & numerical data
14.
Can J Cardiol ; 32(2): 266-9, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26481084

ABSTRACT

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) was initially developed to treat aortic stenosis in patients with high risk for surgical intervention. With great initial adoption of the technology and improvements in device design and procedural success TAVI is increasingly being performed in broader populations for diverse indications. This paper is a concise review of the evolving and expanding use of TAVI in the current era.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/instrumentation , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnosis , Equipment Design , Humans , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
15.
Int J Cardiol ; 189: 282-8, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25910593

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BiAV). BACKGROUND: BiAV remains a relative contraindication to TAVI resulting in exclusion from TAVI trials and thus limiting data on the clinical performance of transcatheter valves in these patients. METHODOLOGY: We conducted an international patient level multicenter analysis on outcomes in patients with BiAV undergoing TAVI. The primary outcome of the study was the combined early safety endpoint--a composite of 30 day mortality, stroke, life-threatening bleeding, acute kidney injury, coronary artery obstruction, major vascular complication and valve related dysfunction. Secondary endpoints included the individual components of the primary endpoint as well as post-TAVI paravalvular leak (PVL), rehospitalization, new pacemaker insertion and device success rates at 30 days and 1 year. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients with BiAV were identified in 21 centers in Canada, Spain, Italy, Poland and Singapore who underwent TAVI between January 2005 and March 2014. The composite primary outcome occurred in one quarter of patients (26.9%)--mainly driven by re-intervention for valve malposition (9.3%). The 30-day and 1 year mortality rates were 8.3% and 16.9% respectively with AR ≥ 3+ occurring in 9.6% of patients. Device success was achieved in 85.2% of cases with pacemaker insertion in 19.4%. While PVL was not associated with an increased risk of 30 day or 1 year mortality--Type I BiAV anatomy with left and right cusp fusion had significantly better outcomes than other valve variants. CONCLUSION: In selected patients with BiAV and severe aortic stenosis, TAVI appears both safe and feasible with acceptable clinical outcomes. Clinical studies of TAVI in this patient population are warranted.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis/therapy , Aortic Valve/abnormalities , Heart Valve Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/methods , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis/etiology , Aortic Valve Stenosis/mortality , Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease , Chi-Square Distribution , Echocardiography, Transesophageal/methods , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Heart Valve Diseases/complications , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Safety , Risk Assessment , Sex Factors , Survival Analysis , Time Factors , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/mortality , Treatment Outcome
17.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes ; 6(3): 315-22, 2013 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23674307

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Practice guidelines recommend intensive-dose statins for patients with acute coronary syndrome, but recent data about the risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus have raised concerns about its use. Our main objective was to evaluate the association between intensive statin therapy and new-onset diabetes mellitus in patients with myocardial infarction and to evaluate the association of intensive statin therapy with long-term adverse clinical outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: A propensity score-matched cohort was created consisting of 17 080 patients with myocardial infarction aged >65 years old, hospitalized in Ontario, Canada, from 2004 to 2010. Clinical outcomes were compared in patients prescribed intensive-dose versus moderate-dose statins at hospital discharge. At 5 years, 13.6% of patients receiving intensive-dose statins and 13.0% of patients receiving moderate-dose statins had new-onset diabetes, which was not significantly different (P=0.19). By contrast, the 5-year rate of death or acute coronary syndrome was significantly lower at 44.8% in the intensive-dose statin group compared with 46.5% in the moderate-dose group (P=0.044). The reduction in combined clinical outcome was driven mainly by a significantly lower rate of acute coronary syndrome (P=0.039) associated with intensive-dose statins. No significant difference in mortality rates (34.8% in both groups) was observed between the treatment groups during the study period (P=0.89). CONCLUSIONS: In older patients with myocardial infarction, we found intensive-dose statin therapy to be effective in reducing repeat hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome. The rate of new-onset diabetes mellitus at long term was not significantly different between intensive-dose and moderate-dose statins.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/chemically induced , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Myocardial Infarction/drug therapy , Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnosis , Acute Coronary Syndrome/mortality , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Comorbidity , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus/mortality , Female , Humans , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Incidence , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Ontario/epidemiology , Patient Discharge , Patient Readmission , Propensity Score , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Secondary Prevention , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
18.
Clin Med Res ; 8(3-4): 150-8, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20739581

ABSTRACT

Levothyroxine (LT4) suppressive therapy for solitary thyroid nodules is not popularly advocated presently because its clinical efficacy and safety are currently considered controversial. This meta-analysis aims to address efficacy issues by using rigorous methods to arrive at a pooled estimate. On the basis of the analysis, it is estimated that LT4 therapy is clearly associated with up to a two-fold increase in the chance of nodule reduction. This translates to a number needed to treat (NNT) of 6 or a 50% decrease in the risk of cancer given nodule reduction. Keeping this definition of efficacy in mind and a low incidence of adverse events with low level LT4 suppression, such an intervention might be appropriate in patients selected on the basis of a low risk for adverse effects.


Subject(s)
Thyroid Nodule/therapy , Thyroxine/pharmacology , Female , Humans , Male , Remission Induction , Risk Factors , Thyroid Nodule/mortality , Thyroxine/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...