Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Anesth Essays Res ; 16(1): 71-79, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36249138

ABSTRACT

Background: Cancer patients accept surgeries as part of their treatment. They may not be aware of the possibility of surgical pain persisting long after the surgery. Understanding chronic postsurgical pain is essential for effective pain management. Aims: We aimed to assess the prevalence of chronic postsurgical pain in cancer patients and the associated symptom burden. Settings and Design: This study was carried out at a tertiary cancer center. It was a cross-sectional study. Materials and Methods: Participants who underwent surgeries were asked to provide feedback on the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory at 3 months. Statistical Analysis Used: Descriptive statistics were used. Statistical tests included Kruskal-Wallis test, Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, and Spearman's correlation. Logistic regression was used to assess the influence of variables on the presence or absence of chronic postsurgical pain. Results: Nine hundred and eighteen participants completed the study. Ninety-two percent (n = 840) were asymptomatic. Eight percent (n = 78) had postsurgical pain. Chronic postsurgical pain was influenced by the type of surgery (P = 0.01), specifically orthopedic and thoracic surgeries. Patients who receive epidurals are three times less likely to continue to have pain at 3 months. Conclusions: The prevalence of chronic postsurgical pain at 3 months in this study is lower than the rates in the literature. It is still associated with symptom burden that interferes with daily life. The risk of developing chronic postsurgical pain increases with thoracic and orthopedic surgeries. The risk may be lowered with epidural analgesia.

2.
Anesth Essays Res ; 12(4): 930-936, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30662133

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Epidural analgesia is preferred in postoperative pain control, but dislodgment is a major factor for failure. Tunneling is well known to control displacement of catheters. In this study, we evaluated if we can depend on tunneling in preventing dislodgment of epidural catheters. AIMS: The aim is to study if tunneling is effective and safe in reducing the rate of epidural catheters' dislodgment. SETTING AND DESIGN: The study was carried out at a single tertiary cancer center. The trial was parallel, simple randomized, controlled, and single blind. Allocation of treatments was generated using random number tables. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Two hundred patients undergoing major surgeries were randomized. Epidural catheters were affixed to the skin through subcutaneous tunneling to a length of 5 cm or using standard adhesive tape without tunneling. Patients were on follow-up for 6 days postsurgery according to policy. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Categorical variables were analyzed by Chi-square and Fisher's exact test. Student t-test was used for continuous variables. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: A total of 200 patients were randomized, 92 patients received tunneled catheters and 108 received nontunneled catheters. Patients were between 20 and 85 years; 63% were male. The mean days of epidural analgesia were similar in both groups (2.7 compared to 2.5 days). About 7.6% of epidurals were dislodged in the tunneled group compared to 10.2% in the nontunneled group (P = 0.699). No differences were identified in the incidence of pain or adverse events between the groups. Tunneling did not improve the rates of dislodgment in epidural catheters. There were no safety concerns associated with tunneling epidural catheters.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...