Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
AIDS Rev ; 26(3): 105-126, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37879633

ABSTRACT

People living with HIV (PLWH) constitute a vulnerable population for acquiring additional sexually transmitted infections (STIs). This study was conducted to provide a summary of the evidence on the global prevalence of STIs in PLWH with an emphasis on infectious agents, diagnostic methods, and related risk factors. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched to include records published from January 01, 1990, to January 31, 2022, and the Google Scholar search engine was used to check the search strategy. In total, 132 eligible studies reporting STIs in PLWH were included, enrolling subjects from 35 countries across five continents. The pooled proportion of STIs was estimated to be 30.23% (95% CI, 26.1-34.45%) in PLWH and 20.01% (95% CI, 17.17-23.01%) in HIV-negative patients. Our meta-analysis indicated that in PLWH, the pooled OR of STIs compared to HIV-negatives was 1.77 (95% CI: 1.58-1.98) (p < 0.0001). The pooled OR of STIs by viral infectious agents was highest in PLWH (52.19% [95% CI: 43.88-60.43]) compared with fungal (22.19% [95% CI: 15.64-29.53]), bacterial (19.07% [95% CI: 13.59-26.63]), and parasitic (14.05% [95% CI: 11.88-16.38]) infections. Our findings show that there is a rather significant frequency of STIs among PLWH. This study highlights the need for new programs for the detection, treatment, and prevention of STIs in this at-risk population.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Sexually Transmitted Diseases , Humans , HIV Infections/complications , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Prevalence , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/complications , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/epidemiology , Risk Factors
2.
Biomedicine (Taipei) ; 8(1): 2, 2018 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29480797

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The presence of Class 1, 2 and 3 integrons in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa with multi-drug resistance phenotype has rendered the organism as a new concern. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of Class 1, 2 and 3 integrons in multi-drug resistant clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected from hospitals in the city of Tabriz Materials and Methods: A total of 200 P. aeruginosa non-duplicated clinical isolates were collected from inpatients and outpatients in different wards of hospitals from May to November 2016. The bacteria were identified by conventional microbiological methods. Antibiotic susceptibility test was performed by disk diffusion method and the presence of integrons was analyzed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). RESULTS: Colistin was the most effective antibiotic, while 98% of the isolates were resistant to cefotaxime. Fifty-three percent of the isolates were recorded as multi-drug resistant (MDR) phenotype; however, 27.5% of the isolates were resistant to more than 8 antibiotics. In this study, 55 (27.5%), 51 (25.5%), and 30 (15%) clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa were positive for Class 1, 2 and 3 integrons, respectively. aac(6)II in Class I integrons and dfrA1 in ClassII and aacA7 in Class II integrons were the most prevalent genes. Resistance to aminoglycosides were the most common genes harbored by integrons. CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that the prevalence of Class 1, 2 and 3 in integron genes in most P. aeruginosa strains islated from different parts and equipment used in the hospital. The role of these transferable genetic agents has been proven in the creation of resistance. Therefore, it is essential to use management practices to optimize the use of antibiotics, preferably based on the results of antibiogram and trace coding genes for antibiotic resistance.

3.
J Chemother ; 28(1): 1-19, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26256147

ABSTRACT

Detection of carbapenemases in clinical microbiology labs is a challenging issue. Comparison of the results of susceptibility testing with the breakpoint values of carbapenems is the first step in the screening of carbapenemase producers. To date, screening of carbapenemase-producing (CP) bacteria has been mostly performed by a selective medium. Although these media are practical for the detection of most CP isolates, the inoculated plates have to be incubated overnight. Subsequently, we need the confirmation of the carbapenemase producers present in the culture medium by additional testing [e.g. inhibition studies with liquid or solid media, modified Hodge test (MHT), or gradient strips], which can take up to another 48 hours. Despite the lack of discrimination between the three different classes of carbapenemases (KPC, MBL and OXA) and difficulties in the interpretation of the results, the MHT is usually deemed as the phenotypic reference method for the confirmation of carbapenemase production. Molecular techniques, such as real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays, in contrast to phenotypic methods that are very time consuming, are faster and allow for the quick identification of carbapenemase genes. These techniques can detect and characterize carbapenemases, including NDM- and KPC-mediated resistance, which is critical for epidemiological investigations. The aim of this review is to gather a summary of the available methods for carbapenemase detection and describe the strengths and weaknesses of each method.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Proteins/analysis , Bacteriological Techniques/methods , Enterobacteriaceae/enzymology , Enzyme Assays/methods , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/methods , beta-Lactamases/analysis , Enterobacteriaceae/isolation & purification , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...