Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis ; 28(8): 779-786, 2018 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29753588

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess effects of alpha-lipoic acid supplementation on C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in clinical trial studies. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic search was carried out on clinical trial studies published in PubMed, ISI Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Scopus databases completed by manual search on reference list of eligible studies accomplished by November 4, 2017. Of a total number of 508 studies found in the first step of literature search, only 11 were included with 264 participants in supplementation groups and 287 in control groups. Estimated pooled random effects size analysis showed a significant reducing effect of alpha-lipoic acid supplementation on CRP level (-0.72 mg/l, 95% CI; -1.4, -0.04; P = 0.03) with a significant heterogeneity between the selected studies. Sub-group analysis showed that alpha-lipoic acid supplementation could significantly reduce serum CRP level when the baseline CRP level was greater than 3 mg/l (-1.02 mg/l, 95% CI: -1.3, -0.73) and when trial duration was >8 weeks (-0.99 mg/l, 95% CI: -1.29, -0.70). Results of subgroup analysis also showed that alpha lipoic acid supplementation could decrease CRP level only in non-diabetic patients (-1.02 mg/l, 95% CI: -1.31, -0.74). CONCLUSIONS: Results of the current meta-analysis study showed that alpha-lipoic acid supplementation could significantly decrease CRP level in patients with elevated levels of this inflammatory marker.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Dietary Supplements , Inflammation Mediators/blood , Inflammation/drug therapy , Thioctic Acid/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/adverse effects , Biomarkers/blood , Dietary Supplements/adverse effects , Down-Regulation , Female , Humans , Inflammation/blood , Inflammation/diagnosis , Male , Middle Aged , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Thioctic Acid/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
2.
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis ; 26(6): 489-94, 2016 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27033026

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIM: SIRT1 and PGC1α are two important genes, which play critical roles in regulating oxidative stress and inflammation processes. The study aimed assess the effects of coadministration of omega-3 and vitamin E supplements on SIRT1 and PGC1α gene expression and serum levels of antioxidant enzymes in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Participants of this randomized controlled trial included 60 CAD male patients who were categorized into three groups: Group 1 received omega-3 (4 g/day) and vitamin E placebo (OP), group 2 omega-3 (4 g/day) and vitamin E (400 IU/day; OE), and group 3 omega-3 and vitamin E placebos (PP) for 2 months. Gene expression of SIRT1 and PGC1α in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCS) was assessed by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Furthermore, serum antioxidant enzyme and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels were assessed at the beginning and end of the intervention. Gene expression of SIRT1 and PGC1α increased significantly in the OE group (P = 0.039 and P = 0.050, respectively). Catalase and hsCRP levels increased significantly in the OE and OP groups. However, glutathione peroxidase (GPX) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) levels did not statistically change in all groups. The total antioxidant capacity (TAC) increased significantly in the OE group (P = 0.009) but not in OP and PP groups. CONCLUSION: Supplementation of omega-3 fatty acids in combination with vitamin E may have beneficial effects on CAD patients by increasing gene expression of SIRT1 and PGC1α and improving oxidative stress and inflammation in these patients.


Subject(s)
Antioxidants/metabolism , Catalase/blood , Coronary Artery Disease/drug therapy , Coronary Stenosis/drug therapy , Dietary Supplements , Docosahexaenoic Acids/administration & dosage , Eicosapentaenoic Acid/administration & dosage , Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma Coactivator 1-alpha/blood , Sirtuin 1/blood , Vitamin E/administration & dosage , Biomarkers/blood , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Artery Disease/blood , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Artery Disease/enzymology , Coronary Stenosis/blood , Coronary Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Stenosis/enzymology , Dietary Supplements/adverse effects , Docosahexaenoic Acids/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Eicosapentaenoic Acid/adverse effects , Glutathione Peroxidase/blood , Health Status , Humans , Inflammation Mediators/blood , Iran , Male , Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma Coactivator 1-alpha/genetics , Sirtuin 1/genetics , Superoxide Dismutase/blood , Therapeutics , Time Factors , Up-Regulation , Vitamin E/adverse effects
3.
Eur J Clin Nutr ; 69(8): 867-73, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25669317

ABSTRACT

C-reactive protein (CRP), a marker of chronic inflammation, has a major role in the etiology of chronic disease. Vitamin E may have anti-inflammatory effects. However, there is no consensus on the effects of vitamin E supplementation on CRP levels in clinical trials. The aim of this study was to systematically review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that report on the effects of vitamin E supplementation (α- and γ-tocopherols) on CRP levels. A systematic search of RCTs was conducted on Medline and EMBASE through PubMed, Scopus, Ovid and Science Direct, and completed by a manual review of the literature up to May 2014. Pooled effects were estimated by using random-effects models and heterogeneity was assessed by Cochran's Q and I(2) tests. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression analyses were also performed according to intervention duration, dose of supplementation and baseline level of CRP. Of 4734 potentially relevant studies, only 12 trials met the inclusion criteria with 246 participants in the intervention arms and 249 participants in control arms. Pooled analysis showed a significant reduction in CRP levels of 0.62 mg/l (95% confidence interval = -0.92, -0.31; P < 0.001) in vitamin E-treated individuals, with the evidence of heterogeneity across studies. This significant effect was maintained in all subgroups, although the univariate meta-regression analysis showed that the vitamin E supplementation dose, baseline level of CRP and duration of intervention were not the sources of the observed heterogeneity. The results of this meta-analysis suggest that supplementation with vitamin E in the form of either α-tocopherol or γ-tocopherol would reduce serum CRP levels.


Subject(s)
C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Dietary Supplements , Vitamins/pharmacology , alpha-Tocopherol/pharmacology , gamma-Tocopherol/pharmacology , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/pharmacology , Biomarkers/blood , Humans , Inflammation/drug therapy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
4.
Diabetes Metab Syndr ; 9(4): 320-3, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25470626

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There is evidence based studies which show that plasma level of visfatin and vaspin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus elevate in comparison with healthy people. But there is no consistency in plasma visfatin and vaspin concentration between studies done on obese people. For this reason, the aim of this study is to investigate the serum level concentrations of visfatin and vaspin in obese women compared to normal weight women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The participants of this study consist of 43 women aged 20-50, and 43 healthy women with normal weight as a control group. They were matched for age and physical activity. 24h food recall was used to collect dietary information from subjects. Moreover, blood sampling was taken to measure the blood levels of sugar, lipid profile, vaspin and visfatin. RESULTS: The mean serum level of visfatin was not statistically different between obese and normal weight women. But, the obese women had statistically higher mean serum level of vaspin than normal women (p=0.04). We found no relations between serum levels of vaspin with serum concentration of visfatin. Also, serum levels of these two adipokines were not related to the serum concentrations of fasting glucose, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyserides and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Also, there was a significant positive relationship between carbohydrate intake and serum visfatin level in women participating to this study (p=0.018, r=0.257). CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrated that the level of serum vaspin was significantly higher in obese women. But there were no differences in serum levels of visfatin in comparison to normal weight women. Meanwhile this study demonstrated a positive relationship between serum levels of visfatin with dietary intake of carbohydrate, but no relationship between serum level of visfatin and vaspin in women participating in this study.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers/blood , Cytokines/blood , Nicotinamide Phosphoribosyltransferase/blood , Obesity/blood , Serpins/blood , Adult , Body Mass Index , Case-Control Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Insulin Resistance , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity/epidemiology , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...