Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BMC Infect Dis ; 22(1): 848, 2022 Nov 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36376846

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a global public health problem, with ~ 11 million people in Africa infected. There is incomplete information on HCV in Sudan, particularly in haemodialysis patients, who have a higher prevalence compared to the general population. Thus, our objectives were to genotype and molecularly characterize HCV isolated from end-stage renal disease haemodialysis patients. METHODS: A total of 541 patients were recruited from eight haemodialysis centres in Khartoum and screened for anti-HCV. Viral loads were determined using in-house real-time PCR in seropositive patients. HCV was genotyped and subtyped using sequencing of amplicons of 5' untranslated (UTR) and non-structural protein 5B (NS5B) regions, followed by phylogenetic analysis of corresponding sequences. RESULTS: The HCV seroprevalence in the study was 17% (93/541), with HCV RNA-positive viremic rate of 7% (40/541). A low HCV load, with a mean of 2.85 × 104 IU/ml and a range of 2.95 × 103 to 4.78 × 106 IU/ml, was detected. Phylogenetic analyses showed the presence of genotypes 1, 3, 4, and 5 with subtypes 1a, 1b, 1 g, 3a, 4a, 4 l, 4 m, 4 s, and 4t. Sequences of HCV from the same haemodialysis units, clustered in similar genotypes and subtypes intimating nosocomial infection. CONCLUSION: HCV infection is highly prevalent in haemodialysis patients from Sudan, with phylogenetic analysis intimating nosocomial infection. HCV genotyping is useful to locate potential transmission chains and to enable individualized treatment using highly effective direct-acting antivirals (DAAs).


Subject(s)
Cross Infection , Hepatitis C, Chronic , Hepatitis C , Kidney Failure, Chronic , Humans , Hepacivirus/genetics , Genotype , Antiviral Agents , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Phylogeny , Renal Dialysis , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Sudan/epidemiology
2.
Exp Clin Transplant ; 14(3): 252-8, 2016 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27041141

ABSTRACT

There is a misconception among transplant clinicians that contraception after a successful renal transplant is challenging. This is partly due to the complex nature of transplant patients, where immunosuppression and graft dysfunction create major concerns. In addition, good evidence regarding contraception and transplant is scarce, with most of the evidence extrapolated from observational and case-controlled studies, thus adding to the dilemma of treating these patients. In this review, we closely analyzed the different methods of contraception and critically evaluated the efficacy of the different options for contraception after kidney transplant. We conclude that contraception after renal transplant is successful with acceptable risk. A multidisciplinary team approach involving obstetricians and transplant clinicians to decide the appropriate timing for conception is recommended. Early counseling on contraception is important to reduce the risk of unplanned pregnancies, improve pregnancy outcomes, and reduce maternal complications in patients after kidney transplant. To ascertain appropriate advice on the method of contraception, individualizing the method of contraception according to a patient's individual risks and expectations is essential.


Subject(s)
Contraception/methods , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Pregnancy, Unplanned , Female , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Live Birth , Male , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/etiology , Pregnancy Complications/prevention & control , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Time-to-Pregnancy , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...