ABSTRACT
Evidence of the effectiveness of statins, the lipid-lowering agents in retarding the progression of Multiple Sclerosis (MS), a disabling neurological disease with autoimmune etiology, have been highlighted in animal studies and observational studies. The proposed immune-modulatory actions and neuroprotective effects of statins make them a promising treatment option for MS that needs to be explored further. In this systematic review, we aim to investigate the role of different statins as monotherapy or in combination with the established MS medications in improving the clinical and radiological course of MS variants, including optic neuritis, using randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We systematically searched PubMed, PubMed Central (PMC), MEDLINE, Cochrane library, and Scopus databases using regular keywords and medical subject headings terms. Randomized controlled trials of any statin used in any variants of MS, including studies on statins used in optic neuritis published up to April 2021, were included in the review. Data on the effects on the relapse rate, the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) alterations, and the changes in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) lesions were collected from the included studies. Seven studies with a total of 831 patients and an average duration of follow-up of six to 36 months were included in our review. Five trials were of statins add-on to interferon therapy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), of which four studies were assessed to be of good quality while the remaining study featured a high risk of bias. One trial of simvastatin monotherapy in Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (SPMS) was included, which was assessed to be of good methodological quality with low risk of bias and adequate patient number. A trial of simvastatin monotherapy on patients with optic neuritis was included, which was evaluated as a good quality study. Still, it had a low number of participants and a short duration of follow-up. We used the changes in disease relapse rate and EDSS as primary outcome variables and the MRI lesions changes as a secondary outcome variable. Studies in RRMS showed no significant effects on primary and secondary outcomes. The study on SPMS featured a significant improvement in EDSS in simvastatin-treated patients with no effect on relapse rate or MRI changes. Simvastatin use in optic neuritis enhances clinical visual outcomes with no significant effect on MRI changes or the rate of progression to definite MS. In contrast to animal studies and observational studies, randomized controlled trials do not replicate the positive effects of statins used as monotherapy or combined with interferon beta in patients with RRMS and optic neuritis in relapse rate EDSS or MRI changes. However, trials of statins on SPMS showed a promising effect on disability progression (EDSS score), which might support the proposed immune-modulatory and neuroprotective role of statins and serve as a baseline for further RCTs applying statins as monotherapy or combination with other established MS therapies.
ABSTRACT
Caffeinated drinks are the most widely consumed beverages globally and their intake has increased in the elderly. Caffeine exhibits dose-dependent adverse effects. Low to moderate doses cause anxiety, restlessness, irritability, and nausea. High doses of 3-5g can affect different physiological systems and lead to detrimental effects like palpitations, hypertension, agitation, seizures, and coma. Low-dose aspirin is the most used anticoagulant in preventing ischemic vascular events. An increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage is associated with low-dose aspirin with an intensified intracerebral hemorrhage risk. The aim of this research is to explore the association between caffeine and aspirin in causing lethal intracranial hemorrhage in the older population. Because of the devastating nature of intracranial hemorrhages and the inconsistent published data on the risk of intracranial hemorrhage in individuals taking both aspirin and caffeine, we conducted a systematic review considering the elderly population. We conducted the study following the reporting guidelines for systematic review and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) checklist. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were determined. Data was collected from PubMed, PubMed Central® (PMC), National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE), Google Scholar, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI), and Web of Science by applying keywords and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms individually. Our initial search yielded 155,270 articles, which were scrutinized, and duplicates were removed for accuracy. Of these, a total of 13 research papers were finally extracted using the PRISMA recommendations and applying other inclusion and exclusion criteria. With the help of our systematic review, we could determine that both aspirin and caffeine portrayed a role in causing intracranial hemorrhage independently, but further studies are recommended to evaluate if both could lead to similar adverse effects when taken collectively.
ABSTRACT
Diabetes Mellitus type II (DM II) is a worldwide disease with a rapidly growing parallel prevalence and adversities affecting multi-body systems. Hence, it is imperative to treat DM II effectively, maintaining glucose homeostasis to avoid complications such as diabetic nephropathy, peripheral neuropathy, and retinopathy. Vitamin D, among many benefits, has positive outcomes on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) control. It aids in insulin secretion and sensitivity. We systematically screened four databases for relevant information; PubMed, Medline, PMC, and Google scholar. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, and quality appraisal was then done using certain checklist tools: Newcastle-Ottawa tool, AMSTAR (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews) checklist, SANRA (Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles) checklist, and Cochrane bias assessment. Data were collected from 14 articles, of which eight are systematic reviews and meta-analysis, one is a narrative review, five are randomized controlled trials and three are general information about DM II and Vitamin D. In addition, this article evaluates the clinical significance of Vitamin D administration in DM II from a glucose homeostasis perspective, and complications such as nephropathy, neuropathy, and retinopathy. Vitamin D had a clinical positive impact on glucose level, particularly on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) reduction, alleviation of diabetic neuropathy and nephropathy symptoms, and hyperglycemia induced-oxidative stress on the retinal cells.
ABSTRACT
Acute coronary syndrome (ACS), a subdivision of ischemic cardiac disease, is the sudden occlusion of coronary vessels that results in decreased blood supply to heart muscles and possible infarction. Though some of the etiologies are hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, and tobacco; certain types of chemotherapies play a major role. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has shown lifesaving results via drug-eluting stent (DES) deployment into occluded vessels. In this study, DES utilization among patients receiving chemotherapy will be assessed to observe if it provides any prevention against ACS. Articles were systematically screened in three databases such as PubMed, PubMed Central (PMC), and Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) using keywords and Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms for applicable articles. Additionally, a few relevant articles from the Cochrane Library, Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI), and The New England Journal of Medicine were also used. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were applied post article screening via title and abstracts. Quality appraisal check was done using the Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles (SANRA) checklist, A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) checklist, Cochrane bias assessment tool, and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist. Ten related studies were strictly reviewed. DES did not appear to play a preventable role against ACS during chemotherapy as no study was found assessing DES prophylactically and its efficacy in cancer patients. Future clinical trials on DES prophylactic use might be beneficial to evaluate if ACS adversities of chemotherapy can be prevented. This review is of significant benefit as cardiovascular adversities would not impede chemotherapy efficacy as cardiac adversities would not be part of the equation.
