Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Prosthet Dent ; 78(2): 179-86, 1997 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9260136

ABSTRACT

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Though computer-based systems for recording three-dimensional jaw motion and muscle activity during mastication are common, few computer programs are available to analyze the resultant data. Few studies have discussed the variability over time of the many parameters of the masticatory cycle now measurable by computer systems. PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to (1) use a custom computer program, (MAS), for analysis of long-term repeated measurements of mandibular motion and muscle activity; (2) determine sex differences for mandibular movements and activity of the muscles involved during mastication; and (3) determine the variability over time and the statistical power of these methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Masticatory cycles of 20 normal men and 17 normal women were examined during mastication of a constant bolus at a sampling rate of 500 fps. Measurements included duration of chewing cycle and its component phases, mandibular displacement in three dimensions, and electromyographic activity in the temporalis and masseter muscles. The MAS custom computer program was used for analysis. Two-way repeated measures analysis of variance was used to compare the men with the women over three trials at 0, 6, and 12 months. The variability over time associated with each measurement was also estimated. RESULTS: Timing of the phases of the chewing cycle were most repeatable between trials, whereas lateral excursions and muscle force magnitudes were the least repeatable measures. Durations of total cycle, its slow-open and fast-close phases, were significantly longer for the female group, and their bursts of muscle activity tended to be longer. The amount of vertical mandibular excursion tended to be greater for men. There were no gender-related differences in the amplitude of muscle activity. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that men have significantly shorter chewing cycles with faster velocities than women. Men used significantly greater chewing force than women, although their electromyographic activity levels were equivalent. The masticatory measurements made by the MAS program had differing amounts of variation over time. Total duration of the chewing cycle and amount of opening varied the least, whereas amount of lateral excursion and jaw muscle electromyographic magnitudes exhibited the greatest variation.


Subject(s)
Mastication/physiology , Software , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Bite Force , Computer Systems , Electromyography , Female , Habits , Humans , Male , Mandible/physiology , Masseter Muscle/physiology , Masticatory Muscles/physiology , Movement , Sex Characteristics , Sex Factors , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted , Temporal Muscle/physiology , Time Factors , Vertical Dimension
2.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 55(7): 699-707; discussion 707-8, 1997 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9216502

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this investigation was to study the long-term effects of orthognathic surgery on mastication in patients before and after four surgical procedures: mandibular advancement, maxillary intrusion, maxillary intrusion with mandibular advancement, and maxillary inferior repositioning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The components and timing of mandibular motion, electromyography (EMG), and estimated biting forces during mastication were studied in 61 patients who underwent orthognathic surgery for correction of four different deformities. The data were statistically compared with 38 control subjects using ANOVA. RESULTS: Preoperatively, there were no significant differences in the duration of the chewing cycles and mandibular excursions among the groups, nor did surgery have any affect on these variables. Before surgery, estimated occlusal forces in the patient groups were smaller than controls. Although these appeared to increase after surgery, the increases did not exceed changes in our untreated controls. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that, with the exception of EMG and occlusal forces, mastication in orthognathic surgery patients is not significantly different from controls either before or after surgery. EMG during mastication, although significantly lower than in controls before surgery, showed significant increases after surgery, but these increases did not bring estimated occlusal forces up to control levels.


Subject(s)
Bite Force , Mandibular Advancement , Mastication/physiology , Masticatory Muscles/physiopathology , Maxilla/surgery , Adaptation, Physiological , Analysis of Variance , Case-Control Studies , Dental Stress Analysis , Electromyography , Female , Humans , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , Jaw Abnormalities/surgery , Male
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...