Type-specific human papillomavirus DNA testing with the genotyping array: a comparison of cervical and vaginal sampling.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the detection and typing of human papillomavirus (HPV) between vaginal and cervical specimens by using polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based reverse-blot genotyping arrays. STUDY DESIGN: Two hundred and fifty-two women were referred to colposcopy clinics because of suspicious or positive results in a community-based cervical cancer-screening program. Genital tract cells were sampled from the cervix and self-collected from the vagina and tested with the HPV Blot kit. RESULTS: The HPV Blot kit identified HPV infection in 24.7% of vaginal specimens and in 30.2% of cervical collections. Cervical sampling detected significantly more infections compared to vaginal sampling only for HPV type 52; cervical sampling also detected significantly more high-risk HPV infection overall. The sensitivities of detecting histology ≥ cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 3 using the HPV Blot in vaginal and cervical specimens were 75.0% (95% CI, 47.6-92.7%) and 87.5% (95% CI, 61.6-98.4%), respectively (P=0.48). Both sampling methods were thus statistically effective at detecting high-grade lesions and cervical cancer (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The HPV Blot yielded similar results for both vaginal sampling and cervical sampling in the detection of CIN grade 3 or worse. These findings indicate that self-sampling for HPV testing is a viable cervical cancer screening option.

Postconization cervical perforation during laparoscopic surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Complications during laparoscopic surgery involving the bladder, bowel, and major vessels have been reported extensively. However, uterine manipulator-associated injuries are seldom reported. CASE REPORT: We describe herein the case of a 28-year-old female patient who underwent a laparoscopic cystectomy 5 days after cervical conization, during which the uterine manipulator perforated the anterior cul-de-sac through the cervix. Fortunately, the wound healed with conservative treatment and no adverse consequences were found. CONCLUSION: This case serves to highlight the potential for complications following seemingly benign maneuvers.

Improved cervical cancer screening in premenopausal women by combination of Pap smear and speculoscopy.

OBJECTIVE: This study was done to evaluate the efficacy of the Pap smear, speculoscopy, and a combination of Pap smear and speculoscopy (PapSure examination) in pre- and postmenopausal women. STUDY DESIGN: All women were screened using the Pap smear and speculoscopy and combination of both (PapSure examination) in the multicenter trial. Final diagnosis of each patient was based on a histological evaluation of the colposcopic target biopsy. Results were analyzed using a proportional comparison test, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value with significance determined at p<0.05. RESULTS: Of 1813 women screened, 1701 were eligible for analysis. Two hundred and fourteen women (12.6%) received at least one positive screening test result. Of the 1084 colposcopic biopsy specimens obtained, 24 showed low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) and 19 high-grade SIL (HSIL). HSIL were considered test-positive. Rate of colposcopy was 21.5% (125/582) in the premenopausal group and 63.9% (321/502) in the postmenopausal group (p<0.001). For premenopausal women, speculoscopy (75.0%) or PapSure (91.7%) provided higher sensitivity than Pap smear (50%) (p<0.05). In postmenopausal women, no statistical significance in sensitivity existed between PapSure (85.7%) and Pap smear (57.1%). Speculoscopy (96.8%) or PapSure (96.5%) had lower specificity than Pap smear (99.6%) (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: PapSure was an accurate alternative screening method to Pap smear or speculoscopy for cervical intraepithelial lesions because of a significantly higher sensitivity along with adequate specificity for premenopausal women; however, PapSure was not a more effective cervical screening method for postmenopausal women.

A randomized, parallel, comparative study of the efficacy and safety of nafarelin versus danazol in the treatment of endometriosis in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nafarelin, a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue, versus danazol in the treatment of women with endometriosis in Taiwan. METHODS: Fifty-nine women with laparoscopically and pathologically confirmed endometriosis were randomized to receive nafarelin or danazol for 180 days. Efficacy was assessed from mean changes in laparoscopy score (LS) and total symptom severity score (TSSS). Adverse events (AEs) and laboratory parameters, including hematology, hepatic function, blood pressure, and lipid levels, were monitored for safety evaluations. RESULTS: All demographic and baseline factors, except body weight, were comparable between the 2 treatment groups. Both nafarelin and danazol satisfactorily resolved pelvic tenderness, induration, pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea and dyspareunia. No significant differences were noted in efficacy endpoints between nafarelin and danazol regarding LS and TSSS at 90 and 180 days of treatment. No significant difference was observed between the 2 groups regarding the overall incidence of AEs, except for laboratory-related AEs. However, nafarelin tended to have less impact than danazol on aspartate transaminase and alanine transaminase, and nafarelin was better tolerated than danazol regarding changes in lipid profiles. Both treatments had little or no effect on hematologic parameters. CONCLUSION: Nafarelin and danazol demonstrated similar clinical efficacy, but nafarelin was associated with fewer laboratory changes and a stable lipid profile, relative to danazol. Moreover, intranasally administered nafarelin is noninvasive, and may be a more comfortable and safer alternative to slow-release injectable GnRH agonists. Based on this study, we suggest that nafarelin, like other GnRH analogues, may be a treatment of choice for Taiwanese women with endometriosis. However, direct comparative studies of nafarelin with slow-release injectable GnRH agonists are now required.