Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Math Biosci Eng ; 16(6): 7659-7670, 2019 08 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31698632

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity profile of apatinib for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: We systematically searched databases for randomized clinical trials published as of November 25, 2017, in which apatinib treatment was compared to placebo or chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. Two investigators independently assessed the articles and extracted their data. The hazard ratios (HRs) for progression-free survival (PFS), relative risks (RRs) for overall response rates (ORRs), disease control rates (DCRs), and odds ratios (ORs) for main toxicity were analyzed using the RevMan 5.3 software (Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014). Results: Our analysis included 413 patients from 5 clinical studies. The pooled HR for PFS was 0.32 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21-0.48; P < 0.00001). The pooled RRs for ORR and DCR were 2.03 (95% CI 1.36-3.01; P = 0.0005) and 1.66 (95% CI 1.07-2.57; P = 0.02), respectively. The pooled OR for main toxicity was 1.34 (95% CI, 0.57-3.17; P = 0.5). Conclusions: Apatinib was a viable treatment alternative for advanced NSCLC, as it offered a clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in PFS, ORR, and DCR. Moreover, therapy with apatinib did not significantly increase toxicity.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pyridines/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/toxicity , Humans , Odds Ratio , Progression-Free Survival , Proportional Hazards Models , Pyridines/toxicity , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome
2.
Exp Ther Med ; 18(5): 3315-3324, 2019 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31602204

ABSTRACT

Smoking is the biggest risk factor for lung cancer. Smokers have a much higher chance of developing lung tumors with a worse survival rate; however, non-smokers also develop lung tumors. A number of questions remain including the underlying difference between smoker and non-smoker lung cancer patients and the involvement of genetic and epigenetic processes in tumor development. The present study analyzed the mutation data of 100 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, 12 non-smokers, 48 ex-smokers and 40 smokers, from Tracking Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Evolution through Therapy Consortium. A total of 68 genes exhibited different mutation patterns across non-smokers, ex-smokers and smokers. A number of these 68 genes encode membrane proteins with biological regulation, metabolic process, and response to stimulus functions. For each group of patients, the top 10 most frequently mutated genes were selected and their oncogenetic tree inferred, which reflected how the genes evolve during tumor genesis. By comparing the oncogenetic trees of non-smokers and smokers, it was identified that in non-smokers, the mutation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) was an early genetic alteration event and EGFR was the key driver, but in smokers, the mutation of titin (TTN) was more important. Based on network analysis, TTN can interact with spectrin α erythrocytic 1 through calmodulin 2 and troponin C1. These genetic differences during tumorigenesis of non-smoker and smoker lung cancer patients provided novel insights into the effects of smoking on the evolutionary trajectory of non-small cell lung cancer and may prove helpful for targeted therapy of different lung cancer subtypes.

3.
BMC Pulm Med ; 18(1): 156, 2018 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30285792

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Treatment of tuberculous-destroyed lung (TDL) with pleuropulmonary resection is challenging. Pulmonary hemorrhage is a frequent complication of this surgical procedure. Continuous efforts have been made to investigate clinical procedures that may reduce intraoperative bleeding effectively. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility and safety of regional arterial embolization before pleuropulmonary resection in patients with TDL. METHODS: The clinical data of 32 patients with TDL were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. These patients were admitted to the hospital between July 2009 and November 2016. All of the patients had moderate to massive hemoptysis and received regional arterial embolization in affected areas. Then, these patients underwent pleuropulmonary resection within 1 week to 2 months after embolization. RESULTS: The results showed that 25 patients (78.1%) had bronchial artery, and all patients had non-bronchial systemic artery found in affected areas. Mild to moderate chest pain was reported in 6 patients, and fever was reported in 2 patients. Intraoperative blood loss during pleuropulmonary resection in patients who had received preoperative regional arterial embolization was 625.6 ± 352.6 ml. Duration of the operation was 120.3 ± 75.2 min. Bronchopleural fistulae and empyema were found in 3 cases (9.4%). CONCLUSION: Performance of regional arterial embolization before pleuropulmonary resection offers a safe and feasible option that reduces intraoperative blood loss and shortens operative time in patients with TDL.


Subject(s)
Blood Loss, Surgical/prevention & control , Bronchial Arteries/diagnostic imaging , Embolization, Therapeutic , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/physiopathology , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/therapy , Adult , Aged , Angiography , Chest Pain/etiology , Female , Hemoptysis/etiology , Humans , Lung/blood supply , Lung/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Pneumonectomy/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...