Comparison of rectal suction versus rectal tube insertion for reducing abdominal symptoms immediately after unsedated colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Abdominal discomfort and bloating are common symptoms after colonoscopy. We aimed to compare the effects of direct rectal suction with insertion of a rectal tube on reducing abdominal symptoms after unsedated colonoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy were randomized to have direct rectal suction or placement of a rectal tube immediately after colonoscopy. Post-procedure abdominal pain and bloating were measured with a 0 - 100 visual analogue scale. All participants ranked their satisfaction with either direct rectal suction or insertion of a rectal tube. RESULTS: Abdominal pain and bloating were significantly reduced by direct rectal suction and placement of a rectal tube at 1 minute (both P < 0.05) and 3 minutes (both P < 0.05) after the colonoscopy. Direct rectal suction significantly reduced abdominal pain at 1 minute (P = 0.001) and 3 minutes (P = 0.005) after colonoscopy compared with rectal tube insertion. Bloating was significantly lower in patients with direct rectal suction compared to those with rectal tube insertion at 1 minute (P = 0.03) after colonoscopy. Greater satisfaction was found in patients with direct rectal suction compared to those with rectal tube insertion (P = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Direct rectal suction is more effective than rectal tube placement in reducing abdominal symptoms immediately after colonoscopy. Our study suggests that direct rectal suction is useful in providing relief of symptoms when patients are having difficulty expelling air or are experiencing abdominal symptoms following colonoscopy.

Predictive factors of silent reflux in subjects with erosive esophagitis.

BACKGROUND: Asymptomatic erosive esophagitis by definition is a condition lacking any reflux symptom. AIMS: We aimed to investigate the prevalence of asymptomatic erosive esophagitis in a general population undergoing periodic health checkup. METHODS: Consecutive subjects undergoing a medical checkup were enrolled for evaluation of reflux disease with upper endoscopy and a validated reflux questionnaire. The presence and severity of erosive esophagitis were evaluated. In all subjects, demographic characteristics and biochemical data were recorded, and sleep and psychological characteristics were assessed by means of self-administered Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score, Taiwanese Depression Questionnaire score, and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory score. RESULTS: Of 2568 subjects eligible for this study, erosive esophagitis was found in 676 subjects (26.3%), in whom the proportions of asymptomatic and symptomatic erosive esophagitis were 59.2% (400 subjects) and 40.8% (276 subjects) respectively. At a univariate analysis, it was found that asymptomatic erosive esophagitis subjects were more frequently of female gender, of older age, with a lower level of education. They also showed less alcohol and tea consumption, less depression, less anxiety, lower serum level of triglyceride, and lower prevalence of metabolic syndrome. Multivariate analysis revealed that female sex (OR = 1.645, p = 0.0146) was a positive predictive factor for asymptomatic erosive esophagitis, whereas higher level of education (OR = 0.564, p = 0.044), higher Taiwanese Depression Questionnaire score (OR = 0.922, p < 0.001), and the presence of metabolic syndrome (OR = 0.625, p = 0.0379) were negative predictive factors. CONCLUSIONS: Asymptomatic erosive esophagitis is a common feature in otherwise healthy subjects and is independently associated with female gender, lower education level, less depression, and lower prevalence of metabolic syndrome.