ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Although several acupuncture and moxibustion therapies have been tested in managing breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL), there is little consensus regarding the best options for treating this condition. This systematic review and network meta-analysis compared the efficacy of various acupuncture and/or moxibustion therapies for BCRL. METHODS: Seven databases and two clinical registration centers were searched from their inception to December 1st, 2023. The Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias assessment tool evaluated the quality of included RCTs. A pairwise meta-analysis was performed in STATA 16.0, while a network meta-analysis was performed in R 4.2.2. RESULTS: 18 studies were included in this analysis. Our results showed that acupuncture and moxibustion methods had great advantages in improving BCRL of patients with breast cancer. In particular, needle-warming moxibustion (NWM) could be the optimal acupuncture and moxibustion method for improving clinical effectiveness and reducing the degree of swelling of affected limbs. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that NWM has great potential in treating BCRL. It may reduce arm circumference, lower swelling levels, and improve clinical effectiveness. Nevertheless, more multi-center, high-quality, and large sample RCTs will be needed in the future.
Subject(s)
Acupuncture Therapy , Breast Cancer Lymphedema , Moxibustion , Humans , Moxibustion/methods , Moxibustion/adverse effects , Female , Acupuncture Therapy/methods , Acupuncture Therapy/adverse effects , Breast Cancer Lymphedema/therapy , Network Meta-Analysis , Treatment Outcome , Breast Neoplasms/complications , Breast Neoplasms/therapyABSTRACT
This study explored the optimum immunization schedule for the quadrivalent influenza split-virion vaccine containing influenza A strains (H1N1 and H3N2) and B lineage strains (Yamagata and Victoria) in children aged 3-8 years. The 652 participants enrolled were divided into two groups based on a history of influenza immunization (IH group) or no history of influenza immunization (NH group). The groups were administered a two-dose immunization schedule on days 0 and 30. In the NH group, on day 30 after the first dose, the positive rates of influenza hemagglutination-inhibition antibodies of strains H1N1, H3N2, BV, and BY were 85.85%, 71.70%, 65.27% and 60.45%, respectively. The positive rates of BV and BY failed to meet the absolute criteria for evaluating the immunogenicity of influenza vaccine in the population aged 3-60 years (for each strain antibody). On day 30 after the second dose, HI antibodies to strains H1N1, H3N2, BV, and BY met the immunogenicity acceptable criteria. In the IH group, on day 30 after the first dose, HI antibodies to strains H1N1, H3N2, BV, and BY met the acceptable criteria for immunogenicity. The incidence rates of adverse reactions (vaccine-related adverse events) from the first dose up until 30 days after the second dose were 20.80% in the IH group and 19.50% in the NH group. Only two Grade 3 adverse reactions (fever: temperature ≥ 39.5 °C, swelling: area ≥ 50% of the injection site area) occurred in the IH group, and no Grade 3 adverse reactions occurred in the NH group. No serious adverse reactions occurred in either group. We conclude that for the NH group, two doses of quadrivalent influenza vaccine should be administered, and for the IH group, a one-dose regimen is acceptable.
