ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: As a novel alternative to the conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) to treat esophageal cancer, single-port laparoscopic retrograde three-step gastric mobilization (SLRM) for esophageal reconstruction during MIE to treat esophageal cancer was attempted in our department. The aim of the present study was to explore the preliminary clinical outcomes and feasibility of this innovative surgery. METHODS: From March 2020 to November 2021, patients undergoing SLRM combined with four-port thoracoscopic McKeown esophagectomy for their esophageal cancers were reviewed. Gastric mobilization with abdominal lymph node dissection was performed through SLRM. The clinical characteristics and short-term outcomes were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients underwent R0 resection without conversion to open surgery. The mean times needed for the thoracic part, abdominal part, and total operation were 43 ± 6 min, 60 ± 18 min, and 230 ± 20 min, respectively. The numbers of mediastinal and abdominal lymph nodes harvested were 13.2 ± 2.7 and 10.2 ± 2.5, respectively. Postoperative pneumonia was encountered in 10 (8.3%) patients. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 3 (2.5%) cases. Temporary vocal cord paralysis was reported in 20 (16.6%) cases. The mean length of hospital stay was 8.5 ± 4.6 days. CONCLUSIONS: The SLRM is a technically feasible and safe treatment for patients with esophageal cancer. It can be considered an alternative method for patients, especially for the ones with obesity and gastric distension.
ABSTRACT
Background: As a novel alternative to the conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE), more minimally invasive single-port laparoscopic retrograde 3-step gastric mobilization (SLRM) for esophageal reconstruction during MIE to treat esophageal cancer was attempted by our department. This study explored the preliminary clinical outcomes and feasibility of this innovative surgery. Methods: The data of 120 patients who had undergone SLRM combined with 4-port thoracoscopic McKeown esophagectomy for their esophageal cancers from March 2020 to November 2021 were reviewed. Gastric mobilization with abdominal lymph node dissection was performed via SLRM. The clinical characteristics and short-term outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. The data of operating time, blood loss, harvested lymph nodes, postoperative hospital stay and complications are presented as the mean and standard deviation. Results: A total of 120 patients underwent R0 resection without conversion to open surgery. The mean times for the thoracic procedure, abdominal procedure, and total operation were 43±6, 60±18, and 195±20 min, respectively. The numbers of mediastinal and abdominal lymph nodes harvested were 13.2±2.7, and 10.2±2.5, respectively. Postoperative pneumonia occurred in 10 patients (8.3%). Anastomotic leakage occurred in 3 patients (2.5%). Temporary vocal cord paralysis was reported in 20 patients (16.6%). The mean length of hospital stay was 8.5±4.6 days. Conclusions: SLRM is a technically feasible and safe treatment for patients with esophageal cancer. It can be considered an alternative method for patients, especially those with obesity and gastric distension.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to review the surgical experience and evaluate the feasibility of thoracoscopic total laryngo-pharyngo-oesophagectomy by multidisciplinary team in the patients with pharyngoesophageal junction cancer. METHODS: A total of 31 patients with pharyngoesophageal junction cancer who underwent thoracoscopic total laryngo-pharyngo-oesophagectomy with gastric pull-up reconstruction performed by a collaborative thoracic surgery and otolaryngology surgery team in our department from January 2009 to January 2019 were retrospectively analysed. Surgical experience, Postoperative morbidity, overall survival were evaluated. RESULTS: The median age was 62 years old. Among these patients, 20 had hypopharyngeal cancer, 11 had cervical oesophageal cancer. No patients died during the perioperative period, and the median operation time was 4 h 30 min. The mean hospital stay was 13 days. The rate of complications was 32.3%. There were two cases of anastomotic leakage, four cases of moderate pulmonary infection. The median follow-up period was 31 months. Four patients were lost to follow-up in the second and fourth years and were considered to have died at that time. The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 52.6% and 31.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: As a salvage surgery, thoracoscopic total laryngo-pharyngo-oesophagectomy by multidisciplinary team can be performed with an acceptable level of perioperative morbidity and mortality, relatively good recovery, and acceptable survival outcome for patients with pharyngoesophageal junction cancer.
Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophagectomy , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Middle Aged , Patient Care Team , Pharyngectomy , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Anammox and autotrophic desulfurization-denitrification (AADD) process is feasible for the nitrogen and sulfide removal in the same reactor, and the influence of excess nitrate produced by anammox could also be alleviated simultaneously. This study firstly proposed a novel strategy with inoculating single anammox sludge to start up the AADD process. Results demonstrated that the 90% nitrogen removal efficiency (NRE), 2.55kgm-3 d-1 nitrogen removal rate (NRR), and 95% sulfide removal efficiency (SRE) were obtained at the influent total nitrogen of 280mgL-1 and sulfide of 221.5mgL-1, and the final effluent nitrate concentration was as low as 8mgL-1 under the appropriate operation conditions. Tryptophan-like and protein-like substances were characterized as the main components in bound EPS. Thiobacillus (35.68%) and Pseudoxanthomonas (11.61%) were identified as the predominant genera. This study will pave a potential avenue to promote the treatment of high concentration nitrogen and sulfide in wastewater in the future.
