ABSTRACT
Eribulin (ERI), clinically utilized for locally advanced or metastatic breast tumors, has shown potential links to the immune system. Notably, the cGAS-STING pathway, a key component of innate immunity, has gained prominence. Yet, limited reports explore ERI's effects on the cGAS-STING pathway. Additionally, the nuclear presence of cGAS remains poorly understood. This study uniquely delves into ERI's impact on both the cytosolic cGAS-STING pathway and nuclear cGAS. ERI enhances nuclear localization of cGAS, resulting in hyper-activation of the cGAS-STING pathway in triple-negative breast cancer cells. Reduction of cGAS heightened both cell proliferation and ERI sensitivity. In clinical data using ERI in a neo-adjuvant setting, patients with low cGAS cases exhibited reduced likelihood of achieving pathological complete response after ERI treatment. These findings illuminate the potential of cGAS and IFNß as predictive biomarkers for ERI sensitivity, providing valuable insights for personalized breast cancer treatment strategies.
Subject(s)
Cell Nucleus , Furans , Ketones , Nucleotidyltransferases , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms , Humans , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Nucleotidyltransferases/metabolism , Female , Ketones/pharmacology , Cell Nucleus/metabolism , Cell Nucleus/drug effects , Cell Line, Tumor , Furans/pharmacology , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Membrane Proteins/metabolism , Membrane Proteins/genetics , Signal Transduction/drug effects , Polyether PolyketidesABSTRACT
Eribulin (ERI), clinically utilized for locally advanced or metastatic breast tumors, has shown potential links to the immune system. Notably, the cGAS-STING pathway, a key component of innate immunity, has gained prominence. Yet, limited reports explore ERI's effects on the cGAS-STING pathway. Additionally, the nuclear presence of cGAS remains poorly understood. This study uniquely delves into ERI's impact on both the cytosolic cGAS-STING pathway and nuclear cGAS. ERI enhances nuclear localization of cGAS, resulting in hyper-activation of the cGAS-STING pathway in triple-negative breast cancer cells. Reduction of cGAS heightened both cell proliferation and ERI sensitivity. In clinical data using ERI in a neo-adjuvant setting, patients with low cGAS cases exhibited reduced likelihood of achieving pathological complete response after ERI treatment. These findings illuminate the potential of cGAS and IFNß as predictive biomarkers for ERI sensitivity, providing valuable insights for personalized breast cancer treatment strategies.
ABSTRACT
Over the past thirty years, the importance of chemokines and their seven-transmembrane G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) has been increasingly recognized. Chemokine interactions with receptors trigger signaling pathway activity to form a network fundamental to diverse immune processes, including host homeostasis and responses to disease. Genetic and nongenetic regulation of both the expression and structure of chemokines and receptors conveys chemokine functional heterogeneity. Imbalances and defects in the system contribute to the pathogenesis of a variety of diseases, including cancer, immune and inflammatory diseases, and metabolic and neurological disorders, which render the system a focus of studies aiming to discover therapies and important biomarkers. The integrated view of chemokine biology underpinning divergence and plasticity has provided insights into immune dysfunction in disease states, including, among others, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In this review, by reporting the latest advances in chemokine biology and results from analyses of a plethora of sequencing-based datasets, we outline recent advances in the understanding of the genetic variations and nongenetic heterogeneity of chemokines and receptors and provide an updated view of their contribution to the pathophysiological network, focusing on chemokine-mediated inflammation and cancer. Clarification of the molecular basis of dynamic chemokine-receptor interactions will help advance the understanding of chemokine biology to achieve precision medicine application in the clinic.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Precision Medicine , Humans , Receptors, Chemokine/genetics , Receptors, Chemokine/metabolism , COVID-19/genetics , Chemokines/genetics , Chemokines/metabolism , Epigenesis, GeneticABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In monarchE and Postoperative Therapy with Endocrine and TS-1 (POTENT) trials, abemaciclib and S-1 have, respectively, shown to be effective as adjuvant therapies for luminal breast cancer (BC), although whether patients who meet the criteria are at high risk of recurrence compared to non-eligible patients is still unknown. Here, we investigated recurrence risk according to the criteria of each trial in Japanese patients. METHODS: We reviewed the records of 992 patients who received surgery at Chiba University Hospital for stage I-III BC from January 2017 to May 2022 and selected 553 analytic cohort patients and retrospectively analyzed the relapse-free survival of the patients as the primary endpoint. High-recurrence risk was defined according to monarchE trial and POTENT trial. RESULTS: The 5-year RFS for monarchE cohort 1 and cohort 2 eligible patients were 77.78% and 89.33%, respectively, which were significantly lower than monarchE non-eligible patients (98.31%; p < 0.0001). However, the 5-year RFS rate for POTENT eligible patients (90.51%) was lower than for POTENT non-eligible patients (98.75%; p = 0.0001); excluding those who met the monarchE criteria, the prognosis of POTENT eligible patients had no significant differences from the prognosis of patients with POTENT non-eligible BC (p = 0.3100). CONCLUSION: MonarchE criteria accurately identify patients who are prone to relapse. Moreover, although POTENT criteria also suggested a reasonable capacity for recurrence prediction, there was no significant difference in recurrence between POTENT non-eligible patients and the patients who were POTENT but not monarchE eligible. This might offer justification for reconsidering the use of S-1 in monarchE non-eligible patients.