Shear bond strengths of various resin cements between three types of adherends and bovine teeth with and without thermocycling.

This study evaluated the shear bond strengths of various types of resin cements between three types of adherends (composite resin, metal, and ceramic) and bovine teeth with and without thermocycling. A conventional resin cement (Variolink N), two adhesive resin cements (PANAVIA F 2.0, Multilink N), and three self-adhesive resin cements (MAXCEM ELITE, Rely X Unicem 2, Speed CEM) were used. The adherends were cemented on the superficial dentin of bovine incisors using each resin cement. Herein, 10 specimens from each group were thermocycled 5,000 times, and the other 10 were stored without thermocycling. With the resin and ceramic adherends, the shear bond strengths of Rely X Unicem 2 were significantly higher than those of the other resin cements both with and without thermocycling (p<0.05). With the metal adherend, the shear bond strengths were not significantly different among the cement groups, except MAXCEM ELITE, which showed the lowest strength.

Reinforcing effect of glass-fiber mesh on complete dentures in a test model with a simulated oral mucosa.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Studies that evaluated the strength of complete dentures reinforced with glass-fiber mesh or metal mesh on a cast with a simulated oral mucosa are lacking. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the mechanical properties of maxillary complete dentures reinforced with glass-fiber mesh with those of metal mesh in a new test model, using a simulated oral mucosa. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Complete dentures reinforced with 2 types of glass-fiber mesh, SES mesh (SES) and glass cloth (GC) and metal mesh (metal) were fabricated. Complete dentures without any reinforcement were prepared as a control (n=10). The complete dentures were located on a cast with a simulated oral mucosa, and a load was applied on the posterior artificial teeth bilaterally. The fracture load, elastic modulus, and toughness of a complete denture were measured using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min. The fracture load and elastic modulus were analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance, and the toughness was analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis test (α=.05). The Tukey multiple range test was used as a post hoc test. RESULTS: The fracture load and toughness of the SES group was significantly higher than that of the metal and control groups (P<.05) but not significantly different from that of the GC group. The elastic modulus of the metal group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P<.05), and no significant differences were observed in the SES and GC groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the control group, the fracture load and toughness of the SES and GC groups were higher, while those of the metal group were not significantly different.

Effects of glass fiber mesh with different fiber content and structures on the compressive properties of complete dentures.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: No study has yet evaluated the strength of complete dentures reinforced with glass fiber meshes with different content and structures. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the reinforcing effects of glass fiber mesh with different content and structures with that of metal mesh in complete dentures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two types of glass fiber mesh were used: SES mesh (SES) and glass cloth (GC2, GC3, and GC4). A metal mesh was used for comparison. The complete dentures were made by placing the reinforcement 1 mm away from the tissue surface. A control group was prepared without any reinforcement (n=10). The compressive properties were measured by a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min. The results were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis test and the Duncan multiple range test (α=.05). RESULTS: The fracture resistance of the SES group was significantly higher than that of the control, GC4, and metal groups (asymptotic P=.004), but not significantly different from the GC2 and GC3 groups. The toughness of the SES and GC3 groups was significantly higher than that of the others (asymptotic P<.001), but not significantly different from that of the GC4 group. CONCLUSIONS: SES and GC3, which have different structures but similar volume content, were the most effective in reinforcing complete dentures. The content of the glass fiber mesh seemed more important than the structures.

Comparison of denture base resin reinforced with polyaromatic polyamide fibers of different orientations.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of reinforcing polyaromatic polyamide (aramid) fibers with various orientations on the flexural properties of denture base resin. Aramid fibers with four orientations of unidirectional, woven, non-woven and paper-type were pre-impregnated and placed at the bottom of a specimen mold. Heat-polymerized denture base resin was packed over the fibers and polymerized. A three-point bending test was performed using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min. The flexural strengths and flexural moduli of the unidirectional and woven groups were significantly higher than those of the control and other experimental groups.For the flexural moduli, all experimental groups showed significantly higher reinforcing effects than the control group. In conclusion, the unidirectional group located perpendicular to the direction of the load was most effective in reinforcing the denture base resin, followed by the woven group.

Reinforcing effects of different fibers on denture base resin based on the fiber type, concentration, and combination.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the reinforcing effects of three types of fibers at various concentrations and in different combinations on flexural properties of denture base resin. Glass (GL), polyaromatic polyamide (PA) and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (PE) fibers were added to heat-polymerized denture base resin with volume concentrations of 2.6%, 5.3%, and 7.9%, respectively. In addition, hybrid fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) combined with either two or three types of fibers were fabricated. The flexural strength, modulus and toughness of each group were measured with a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min. In the single fiber-reinforced composite groups, the 5.3% GL and 7.9% GL had the highest flexural strength and modulus; 5.3% PE was had the highest toughness. Hybrid FRC such as GL/PE, which showed the highest toughness and the flexural strength, was considered to be useful in preventing denture fractures clinically.

Microleakage of different sealing materials in access holes of internal connection implant systems.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Current implant systems cannot completely prevent microleakage from the access holes of screw-retained implant prostheses, which may constitute risks to the clinical success of the implants. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the levels of microleakage through the access holes of screw-retained implant prostheses sealed with different materials. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An implant with an internal hexagonal configuration was connected to a temporary abutment with an acrylic resin crown. The apical 6.5 mm of the access hole was filled with 1 of the following materials: cotton pellet, silicone sealing material, vinyl polysiloxane, or gutta-percha. The remaining coronal 3 mm was sealed with composite resin. Cyclic loading with 21 N at 1 Hz was applied 16,000 times to the specimens in 0.5% basic fuchsin solution according to the long axis of the tooth. Basic fuchsin dye which penetrated into the internal wall of the abutment through the access hole was dissolved with methyl alcohol. Then the absorbance was measured by a spectrophotometer at 540 nm to evaluate the degree of microleakage. The results were statistically analyzed with 1-way ANOVA and the Tukey HSD test. RESULTS: From greatest to least, the levels of microleakage were in the following order: cotton pellet, silicone sealing material, vinyl polysiloxane, and gutta-percha. The microleakage associated with gutta-percha was not significantly different from that of vinyl polysiloxane. CONCLUSIONS: When sealing the access holes of screw-retained implant prostheses, gutta-percha or vinyl polysiloxane would help reduce microleakage.