Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 40(2): 220-224, Mar-Apr/2014. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-711687

ABSTRACT

ObjectiveTo investigate the safety and feasibility of self-retaining bidirectional barbed absorbable suture application in retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy.Materials and MethodsFrom Sep 2011 and Aug 2012, 76 cases of retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy were performed at our hospital. The patients were divided into two groups: self-retaining barbed suture (SRBS) group (n = 36) and non-SRBS group (n = 40). There was no significant difference in age, sex, tumor size and location between the two groups. Clinical data and outcomes were analyzed retrospectively.ResultsAll 76 cases of retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy were successfully performed, without conversion to open surgery or serious intraoperative complications. In the SRBS group, the suture time, warm ischemia time and operation blood loss were significantly shorter than that of non-SRBS group (p < 0.01), and operation time and hospital stay were shorter than that of non-SRBS group (p < 0.05).ConclusionsThe application of self-retaining bidirectional barbed absorbable suture in retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy could shorten suture time and warm ischemia time, with good safety and feasibility, worthy of being used in clinic.


Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/surgery , Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Nephrectomy/methods , Retroperitoneal Space/surgery , Suture Techniques , Sutures , Blood Loss, Surgical , Nephrectomy/adverse effects , Operative Time , Postoperative Complications , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Statistics, Nonparametric , Suture Techniques/adverse effects , Sutures/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Warm Ischemia
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL