ABSTRACT
The formation of an internal fistula between the biliary system and the gastrointestinal tract is a rare condition with various etiologies, predominantly associated with recurrent chronic inflammation of the biliary system and tumors. Patients with this condition may lack specific clinical manifestations, presenting with symptoms such as abdominal pain, fever, jaundice, or may show no clinical signs at all. Common types of internal fistulas include cholecystoduodenal fistula, cholecystocolonic fistula, and choledochoduodenal fistula. Among these, the right hepaticoduodenal fistula is extremely rare and seldom reported in clinical literature. We herein report a case of right hepaticoduodenal fistula and analyze its mechanism, treatment principles, and preventive measures through a literature review.
ABSTRACT
RATIONALE: Coagulation factor V deficiency is rare, and perioperative management of patients with this condition is particularly important, especially during major abdominal surgery. We present a case of a patient with pancreatic duct stones combined with coagulation factor V deficiency. We share our perioperative management experience. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 31-year-old man presented with recurrent upper abdominal pain for 2 years. DIAGNOSES: The diagnosis of pancreatic duct stones in the patient has been established through abdominal computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging examinations. The diagnosis of factor V deficiency was initially identified through coagulation function tests, revealing significant prolongation of both aPTT and PT. Subsequent testing of coagulation factors and inhibitors demonstrated that the patient has a deficiency in coagulation factor V. Finally, genetic testing revealed that the factor V deficiency in this case is hereditary. INTERVENTIONS: The patient underwent a partial resection of the pancreatic head, and FFP was infused 1 hour before surgery. 600 mL of FFP was instilled 1 hour before the start of surgery along with 10 U of cryoprecipitate. and 600 ml of FFP were added during surgery. Postoperative treatment included intermittent FFP supplemental infusion in the first 5 days after surgery while monitoring the coagulation function. OUTCOMES: The patient underwent a successful surgery without any abnormal bleeding or oozing during the procedure. The postoperative recovery was smooth, with no abnormal bleeding. LESSONS: Patients with a deficiency of coagulation factor V are not contraindicated for surgery. Appropriate Fresh Frozen Plasma (FFP) replacement therapy can ensure the safe conduct of the surgical procedure. For patients with abnormal blood coagulation function, we recommend testing for coagulation factors and inhibitors, as well as performing genetic testing for abnormal coagulation factors, which can provide guidance on marriage and childbirth.
Subject(s)
Blood Coagulation Disorders , Factor V Deficiency , Male , Humans , Adult , Factor V , Blood Coagulation , Partial Thromboplastin TimeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization are still uncertain. The aim of this study was to compare our results for laparoscopic splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization with those for open splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2008 to December 2011, 153 patients were diagnosed with portal hypertension and serious gastroesophageal varices in our institute, among which, 107 patients also had repeated upper gastrointestinal bleeding and 85 had severe hypersplenism. Eighty patients chose laparoscopic splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization and 73 patients underwent the open procedure. Results and outcomes were compared retrospectively. RESULTS: Nine patients underwent conversion to laparotomy in the laparoscopic group. We compared the laparoscopic group (80 patients) and the open group (73 patients). Operating times and the frequencies of blood transfusions were similar. Blood loss was less (P = 0.044), the passing of flatus was earlier (P = 0.041), and hospital stays were shorter (P = 0.028) in the laparoscopic group. Portal vein system thrombosis after laparoscopy was more frequent (P = 0.012) but the rates of main trunk occlusion were similar between the two groups. Pleural effusion after laparoscopy was less (P = 0.021) and, apart from this, there was no difference in other morbidities between the two groups. During a postoperative follow-up period of 2 to 50 months in 80 patients of the laparoscopic group vs. 73 patients of the open group, the incidence of esophagogastric variceal rebleeding, encephalopathy, and secondary liver cancer showed no significant differences. And the mortality rates for each of the groups were not different. CONCLUSIONS: The short-term effects of laparoscopic splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization were better than those for open surgery, and the medium-term effects were similar between these two surgical approaches. Prospective randomized studies with a greater number of cases are needed to confirm the role of laparoscopy in splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization.
