Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Transl Cancer Res ; 9(3): 1351-1360, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35117483

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Globally, gastric carcinoma (GC) is one of the most commonly encountered malignancies and is the second highest contributor to cancer mortality. Lapatinib is a potent, orally-bioavailable small-molecule inhibitor of both epidermal growth factor receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 tyrosine kinases, and is administered to treat GC. However, a large proportion of patients either develop resistance to or do not respond to lapatinib, often because the treatment activates alternative signaling pathways. It is, therefore, vital to identify the key pathways which mediate resistance to lapatinib treatment. METHODS: The lapatinib sensitivity-related genes were extracted from the CellMiner database (version 2.2) using "NCI-60 Analysis Tools". The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in gastric cancer were derived from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was derived from the Human Protein Reference Database (HPRD), and the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) facilitated the functional analysis. The cell function was tested by CCK-8 cell viability assay, colony formation assay, acridine orange/ethidium bromide (AO/EB) staining, and Transwell assay. RESULTS: The functional linkage networks of lapatinib sensitivity were constructed. Two modules were identified, and pathway analysis indicated that these modules were involved in several pathways, including the neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction network and the Rap1 signaling pathway. Finally, the breast cancer anti-estrogen resistance 1 (BCAR1) gene was selected for further study with lapatinib-resistant SUN216 cells (SUN216/LR). We found the expression of BCAR1 was upregulated in SUN216/LR cells compared to SUN216 cells. The IC50 of lapatinib in SUN216/LR cells was reduced upon BCAR1 knockdown, as measured by a CCK-8 assay. A clonogenic assay showed fewer SUN216/LR colonies with BCAR1 knockdown and lapatinib treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In brief, we efficiently identified those crucial modules highly related to lapatinib sensitivity in GC by using a topological network method. BCAR1 was identified as a potentially critical gene that plays a role in lapatinib sensitivity, and experiments confirmed that BCAR1 might contribute to lapatinib resistance in GC. These results provide further insight into the molecular basis of lapatinib sensitivity and may offer novel strategies for the future treatment of GC.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...