Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Curr Med Sci ; 42(2): 280-285, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35438471

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia (PKD) is a rare movement disorder PRRT2 gene mutations have been reported to cause PKD. However, the pathophysiological mechanism of PKD remains unclear, and it is unknown whether an inflammatory response is involved in the occurrence of this disease. We aimed to investigate the symptomatology, genotype, and serum cytokines of patients with PKD. METHODS: We recruited 21 patients with PKD, including 7 with familial PKD and 14 with sporadic PKD. Their clinical features were investigated, and blood samples were collected, and PRRT2 mutations and cytokine levels were detected. RESULTS: The mean age at PKD onset was 12.3±2.2 years old. Dystonia was the most common manifestation of dyskinesia, and the limbs were the most commonly affected parts. All attacks were induced by identifiable kinesigenic triggers, and the attack durations were brief (<1 min). Four different mutations from 9 probands were identified in 7 familial cases (71.4%) and 14 sporadic cases (28.6%). Two of these mutations (c.649dupC, c.620_621delAA) had already been reported, while other 2 (c.1018_1019delAA, c.1012+1G>A) were previously undocumented. The tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α level in the PKD group was significantly higher than that in the age- and sex-matched control group (P=0.025). There were no significant differences in the interleukin (IL)-1ß, IL-2R, IL-6, IL-8, or IL-10 levels between the two groups. CONCLUSION: In this study, we summarized the clinical and genetic characteristics of PKD. We found that the serum TNF-α levels were elevated in patients clinically diagnosed with PKD, suggesting that an inflammatory response is involved in the pathogenesis of PKD.


Subject(s)
Dystonia , Adolescent , Child , Cytokines/genetics , Dystonia/diagnosis , Dystonia/genetics , Humans , Membrane Proteins/genetics , Mutation , Nerve Tissue Proteins/genetics
2.
Clin Infect Dis ; 72(4): 626-633, 2021 02 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33048116

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) experience a wide clinical spectrum, with over 2% developing fatal outcome. The prognostic factors for fatal outcome remain sparsely investigated. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed in a cohort of patients with confirmed COVID-19 in one designated hospital in Wuhan, China, from 17 January-5 March 2020. The laboratory parameters and a panel of cytokines were consecutively evaluated until patients' discharge or death. The laboratory features that could be used to predict fatal outcome were identified. RESULTS: Consecutively collected data on 55 laboratory parameters and cytokines from 642 patients with COVID-19 were profiled along the entire disease course, based on which 3 clinical stages (acute stage, days 1-9; critical stage, days 10-15; and convalescence stage, day 15 to observation end) were determined. Laboratory findings based on 75 deceased and 357 discharged patients revealed that, at the acute stage, fatality could be predicted by older age and abnormal lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), urea, lymphocyte count, and procalcitonin (PCT) level. At the critical stage, the fatal outcome could be predicted by age and abnormal PCT, LDH, cholinesterase, lymphocyte count, and monocyte percentage. Interleukin 6 (IL-6) was remarkably elevated, with fatal cases having a more robust production than discharged cases across the whole observation period. LDH, PCT, lymphocytes, and IL-6 were considered highly important prognostic factors for COVID-19-related death. CONCLUSIONS: The identification of predictors that were routinely tested might allow early identification of patients at high risk of death for early aggressive intervention.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Aged , COVID-19/mortality , China/epidemiology , Humans , Laboratories , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies
3.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 7: 564, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33015107

ABSTRACT

On April 8, 2020, after nearly 3 months of battling against the outbreak of COVID-19, Wuhan, where the pandemic began, began easing lockdown restrictions. However, given that asymptomatic carriers could continue to lead to transmission of COVID-19 during the very early stages, the endoscopists have taken precautions and conduct risk assessments to perform endoscopic intervention in this transition stage. Here, we have reported an urgent ERCP in a patient with acute pancreatitis secondary to JPDD-related biliary stone. Based on our experiences, the objective is to provide practical suggestions for the safe resumption of ERCP procedures in the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic with specific focus on patient risk assessment, personal protection equipment (PPE), and dress code modalities, all of which have been implemented in our hospital to reduce the risk of viral transmission.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...