ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the clinical effect of minimal invasive drilling cranium from frontal part and craniotomy from temporal in the treatment of patients with cerebral hemorrhage in basal ganglia.Methods From August 2011 to August 2017,126 cases with cerebral hemorrhage in basal ganglia in the People's Hospital of Meishan were divided into observation group and control group,with 63 cases in each group.The observation group was treated by minimal invasive drilling cranium,and the control group was treated by craniotomy.The clinical treatment effect,operation indicators (operation time,amount of intraoperative bleeding,operation cost,discharge time) and nervous function recovery were analyzed.Results The operation time,amount of intraoperative bleeding,operation cost,discharge time of observation group were (31.6 ± 10.3) min,(20.9 ±5.8)mL,(2.1 ± 1.0) thousand CNY,(15.3 ± 0.9) d,respectively,which were better than those of the control group [(214.2 ± 46.8) min,(94.1 ± 56.2) mL,(15.0 ±4.8) thousand CNY,(21.4 ±0.4)d] (t =13.56,11.94,19.65,8.39,all P ＜0.05).The effective rate and the nerve function score between the two groups had no statistically significant differences (all P ＞ 0.05).Conclusion The minimal invasive drilling cranium from frontal part has advantages of small surgical trauma,short operation time,less bleeding in the operation,low death rate,less cost of operation,short hospitalization time and good drainage effect,and thus it is worthy of clinical application.
