Non-operative interventions for Pierre-Robin sequence: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Pierre-Robin Sequence (PRS) is a sequence of micrognathia, glossoptosis, and airway obstruction. There is no standardized consensus on the management of respiratory distress for patients with PRS, and operative interventions have associated complications. The purpose of this study is to identify all modalities of non-operative airway intervention for PRS infants. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, Embase, Medline, Cochrane, EMCARE, and Web of Science electronic databases were searched from 1992 to 2022 reporting on PRS infants under one year of age who were managed non-operatively. Publications with non-original research designs, an exclusive focus on surgical interventions, case reports, and non-English language articles were excluded. Analysis was performed using non-pooled and pooled proportions (PP). 3280 abstracts were screened, and 88 articles included. Retrospective methodologies were most common. Of the 60 studies where both operative and non-operative interventions were included, 2924 of 4708 PRS infants were administered a non-operative intervention (PP 65.8 % [95%CI 58.5, 72.7]). Reported definitive non-operative interventions, either alone or in combination with another non-operative intervention, included infant positioning (n = 1664), orthodontic appliances (n = 1299), nasopharyngeal tube insertion (n = 983), supplemental oxygen (n = 306), non-invasive ventilation (n = 290), oral airway (n = 46), endotracheal intubation (n = 36), and other (n = 40). The mean MINORS risk of bias score was 6.3 (range 1-12), indicating that the present review was limited by moderate methodological quality for included studies. This is the largest systematic review of non-operative interventions for PRS infants thus far. Most infants are managed non-operatively, with positioning, orthodontic appliances, and nasopharyngeal tubes being the most commonly reported modalities.

Margin status of basal cell carcinoma: What can be done better?

PURPOSE: Guidelines on clinical margins for basal cell carcinoma (BCC) excisions were recently published, yet the ambiguity regarding the margin continues for surgeons and pathologists. The purpose of this study was to determine the incomplete excision rate of BCC, determine the factors associated with incomplete excision, and evaluate the completeness of reporting between surgeon and pathologist. METHODS: A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted on pathology reports from single excisions of BCC specimens between January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2020. The primary outcome was the incomplete excision rate (positive margins) as reported by pathologist. Logistic regression was used to determine the relationship between incomplete excision rate and anatomical location, pathologist, and surgeon. The completeness of surgeon pathology requisition forms was evaluated qualitatively. RESULTS: Seven hundred and fifty-six pathology reports were included. The incomplete excision rate was 12% (n = 94). The most common site of incomplete excision was head and neck (n = 87, 15%), followed by trunk (n = 5, 7%), and extremities (n = 2, 2%). Five hundred and seventy-nine specimens from 6 surgeons and 9 pathologists were included in the logistic regression analysis. The Wald test showed that the location was significantly associated with incomplete excision (p < 0.05), whereas surgeon and pathologist reports were not (p > 0.05). Regarding missing information, only 47 (6%) pathology reports included "excision" in the requisition form. Four hundred and three (53%) specimens had no clinical history. CONCLUSIONS: The incomplete excision rate found in this study falls within the report range in the literature. Neither surgeon nor pathologist had significant association with incomplete excision. Incomplete excision rate of BCC may be inflated owing to the lack of standardization in requisition form and pathology reporting.

Assessing the Utility of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in Screening for Cognitive Impairment in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: Screening for cognitive impairment (CI) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) relies on the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) neuropsychological battery (NB). By studying the concurrent criterion validity, our goal was to assess the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) as a screening tool for CI compared to the ACR-NB and to evaluate the added value of the MoCA to the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM). METHODS: A total of 285 adult SLE patients were administered the ACR-NB, MoCA, and ANAM. For the ACR-NB, patients were classified as having CI if there was a Z score of ≤-1.5 in ≥2 domains. The area under the curve (AUC) and sensitivities/specificities were determined. A discriminant function analysis was applied to assess the ability of the MoCA to differentiate between CI, undetermined CI, and non-CI patients. RESULTS: CI was not accurately identified by the MoCA compared to the ACR-NB (AUC of 0.66). Sensitivity and specificity were poor at 50% and 69%, respectively, for the cutoff of 26, and 80% and 45%, respectively, for the cutoff of 28. The MoCA had a low ability to identify CI status. The addition of the MoCA to the ANAM led to improvement on the AUC by only 2.5%. CONCLUSION: The MoCA does not have adequate concurrent criterion validity to accurately identify CI in patients with SLE. The low specificity of the MoCA may lead to overdiagnosis and concern among patients. Adding the MoCA to the ANAM does not substantially improve the accuracy of the ANAM. These results do not support using the MoCA as a screening tool for CI in patients with SLE.

Validation of the automated neuropsychological assessment metrics for assessing cognitive impairment in systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: We previously demonstrated the utility of the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) for screening cognitive impairment (CI) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and developed composite indices for interpreting ANAM results. Our objectives here were to provide further support for the ANAM's concurrent criterion validity against the American College of Rheumatology neuropsychological battery (ACR-NB), identify the most discriminatory subtests and scores of the ANAM for predicting CI, and provide a new approach to interpret ANAM results using Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis. METHODS: 300 adult SLE patients completed an adapted ACR-NB and ANAM on the same day. As per objectives, six models were built using combinations of ANAM subtests and scores and submitted to CART analysis. Area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate the ANAM's criterion validity compared to the adapted ACR-NB; the most discriminatory ANAM subtests and scores in each model were selected, and performance of models with the highest AUCs were compared to our previous composite indices; decision trees were generated for models with the highest AUCs. RESULTS: Two models had excellent AUCs of 86 and 89%. Eight most discriminatory ANAM subtests and scores were identified. Both models demonstrated higher AUCs against our previous composite indices. An adapted decision tree was created to simplify the interpretation of ANAM results. CONCLUSION: We provide further validity evidence for the ANAM as a valid CI screening tool in SLE. The decision tree improves interpretation of ANAM results, enhancing clinical utility.

Metrics and definitions used in the assessment of cognitive impairment in systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To review: 1) degree of conformity to the American College of Rheumatology neuropsychological battery (ACR-NB) among studies that used a NB, 2) review definitions of cognitive impairment (CI) from studies that used a NB, and 3) characterize measurement tools used to assess CI in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: The literature search was conducted in Ovid Medline, Embase, and PsycINFO for articles on CI in adult SLE patients. We reviewed studies that used a NB and compared their tests to the ACR-NB to assess the degree of conformity. Definitions of CI from studies that used a NB were reviewed when sufficient information was available. We reviewed and categorized CI measurement tools into four broad categories: NB, screening, incomplete/mixed batteries, and computerized batteries. RESULTS: Of 8727 references, 118 were selected for detailed review and 97 were included in the final analysis. Of 43 studies that used a NB, none of the studies used the ACR-NB exactly as published. Many studies supplemented with other tests. Overall, there was inconsistent use of ACR-NB tests. Definitions for CI varied, with cut-offs ranging from 1 to 3 standard deviations below normative values on domains/tests varying in type and number. The most frequently used measurement tool for assessing CI in SLE was a NB. Use of screening tests and computerized batteries have also increased over the last decade. CONCLUSION: The assessment and definition of CI in SLE remains heterogeneous. A consensus meeting to address existing inconsistencies should be considered to harmonize the field of CI in SLE.

Association between Sleep Disturbances and Medial Temporal Lobe Volume in Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment Free of Lifetime History of Depression.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies examining the link between neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) and biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease (AD) may be confounded by remitted or past history of psychiatric illness, which in itself is associated with AD biomarkers such as reduced medial temporal lobe (MTL) volume. OBJECTIVE: We examined associations between mood and anxiety-related NPS and MTL in older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) free of lifetime history of depression. We hypothesized an inverse relationship between NPS severity and MTL. METHODS: Forty-two MCI participants without current or past history of depression or other major psychiatric illness were assessed using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Questionnaire (NPI-Q). Correlation and regression analyses were performed between selected NPI-Q items and regional MTL volumes from structural magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: Sleep disturbances were inversely associated with several regional volumes within the MTL. Sleep disturbances remained significantly correlated with left hippocampal and amygdala volume following correction for multiple comparisons. In contrast, depression and anxiety were not correlated with MTL. CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between reduced MTL and sleep, but not with depressed or anxious states, in MCI free of lifetime history of depression, suggests a potential mechanism for sleep as a risk factor for AD. The current findings highlight the importance of accounting for remitted psychiatric conditions in studies of the link between NPS and AD biomarkers and support the need for further research on sleep as clinical biomarker of AD and target for AD prevention.