ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Non-operative management is the standard of care for pediatric blunt splenic injury. The American Pediatric Surgical Association recommends intensive care unit monitoring only for grade IV/V blunt splenic injury; however, variation remains regarding this practice. We hypothesized that pediatric trauma patients with near-isolated grade III blunt splenic injuries admitted to a non-intensive care unit setting would have similar outcomes to those admitted to the intensive care unit. METHODS: The 2017 to 2019 Trauma Quality Improvement Program database was queried for blunt pediatric trauma patients (≤16 years) with near-isolated grade III blunt splenic injuries. Patients with systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg or heart rate >90 were excluded. Pediatric trauma patients admitted to the intensive care unit were compared to non-intensive care unit admissions. The primary outcome was splenectomy. Bivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of 461 pediatric trauma patients with near-isolated grade III blunt splenic injuries, 186 (40.3%) were admitted to the intensive care unit. Intensive care unit patients were older than their non-intensive care unit counterparts (15 vs 14 years, P = .03). Intensive care unit and non-intensive care unit patients had a similar rate of splenectomy (0.5% vs 0.7%, P = .80) and time to surgery (19.7 vs 19.8 hours, P = .98). Patients admitted to the intensive care unit had a longer length of stay (4 vs 3 days, P < .001). There were no significant complications or deaths in either group. CONCLUSION: This national analysis demonstrated that hemodynamically stable pediatric trauma patients with near-isolated grade III blunt splenic injuries admitted to the floor or intensive care unit had a similar rate of splenectomy without complications or deaths. This aligns with American Pediatric Surgical Association recommendations that pediatric trauma patients with grade III blunt splenic injuries be managed in non-intensive care unit settings. Widespread adoption is warranted and should lead to decreased healthcare expenditures.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Geriatric patients constitute a growing portion of the general population, with particular increase in the prevalence of octogenarians. The incidence and prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) have been clearly shown to be associated with advancing age. The effect of advanced age in outcomes from endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is unclear. We study the effect of advanced age, as an independent risk factor for mortality in octogenarian geriatric patients (OGPs) compared to nonoctogenarian geriatric patients (NOGPs) undergoing EVAR. METHODS: The 2011-2017 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) Procedure-Targeted Vascular database was queried for geriatric patients (>65 years) undergoing EVAR for symptomatic and asymptomatic indications. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed comparing outcomes between OGPs and NOGPs. RESULTS: Of the 10,490 geriatric patients who underwent EVAR, 7,508 (71.6%) were NOGPs and 2,982 (28.4%) were OGPs. Octogenarians were more often female (82.3% vs. 76.7%). In comparison to NOGPs, fewer OGPs were treated for AAA <5.5 cm (46.7% vs. 54.9%, P < 0.001) and AAA <5.0 cm (19.2% vs. 24.0%, P < 0.001). Nearly 90% of male and over 80% of female NOGPs and OGPs treated for AAA <5.0 cm were asymptomatic. Octogenarian geriatric patients (OGPs) had less dyspnea (15.3% vs. 17.3%, P = 0.01), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (16.1% vs. 20.5%, P < 0.001), diabetes (12.7% vs. 17.8%, P < 0.001), and smoking (13.2% vs. 36.3%, P < 0.001) compared to NOGPs. Octogenarian geriatric patients (OGPs) were found to have a greater length of stay (2 days vs. 1 day, P < 0.001), as well as rate of mortality (3.4% vs. 1.7%, P < 0.001). Both symptomatic and asymptomatic OGPs had a higher rate of mortality than their NOGP counterparts (symptomatic 16% vs. 9.5%, P < 0.001; asymptomatic 1.3% vs. 0.5%, P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed OGPs to have increased overall associated risk of mortality compared to NOGPs (odds ratio (OR) 1.88, confidence interval (CI) 1.39-2.54, P < 0.001), as well as in the symptomatic (OR 1.54, CI 1.06-2.23, P < 0.001) and asymptomatic cohorts (OR 2.66, CI 1.59-4.45, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Octogenarian geriatric patients (OGPs) accounted for over a quarter of geriatric patients undergoing EVAR. This elderly group was associated with an increased rate and risk of mortality compared to NOGPs, even when controlling for known risk factors for mortality. Given this increased risk of mortality in OGPs undergoing EVAR, elective treatment of AAAs in this advanced age group should be performed with caution, particularly in those with diameters in which the risk of rupture may not warrant repair.
