Integration of CNS survival and differentiation by HIF2α.

Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) 1α and HIF2α and the inhibitor of apoptosis survivin represent prominent markers of many human cancers. They are also widely expressed in various embryonic tissues, including the central nervous system; however, little is known about their functions in embryos. Here, we show that zebrafish HIF2α protects neural progenitor cells and neural differentiation processes by upregulating the survivin orthologues birc5a and birc5b during embryogenesis. Morpholino-mediated knockdown of hif2α reduced the transcription of birc5a and birc5b, induced p53-independent apoptosis and abrogated neural cell differentiation. Depletion of birc5a and birc5b recaptured the neural development defects that were observed in the hif2α morphants. The phenotypes induced by HIF2α depletion were largely rescued by ectopic birc5a and birc5b mRNAs, indicating that Birc5a and Birc5b act downstream of HIF2α. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay revealed that HIF2α binds to birc5a and birc5b promoters directly to modulate their transcriptions. Knockdown of hif2α, birc5a or birc5b reduced the expression of the cdk inhibitors p27/cdkn1b and p57/cdkn1c and increased ccnd1/cyclin D1 transcription in the surviving neural progenitor cells. The reduction in elavl3/HuC expression and enhanced pcna, nestin, ascl1b and sox3 expression indicate that the surviving neural progenitor cells in hif2α morphants maintain a high proliferation rate without terminally differentiating. We propose that a subset of developmental defects attributed to HIF2α depletion is due in part to the loss of survivin activity.

Correct Expression of spec2a in the sea urchin embryo requires both Otx and other cis-regulatory elements.

Strongylocentrotus purpuratus Otx (SpOtx) is required simultaneously in sea urchin development for the activation of endo16 in the vegetal plate and for the activation of spec2a in the aboral ectoderm. Because Otx binding sites alone do not appear to be responsible for the spatially restricted expression of spec2a, additional DNA elements were sought. We show here that consensus Otx binding sites fused to basal promoters are sufficient to activate CAT reporter gene expression in all cell types, although expression in endomesoderm progenitors is enhanced. On the other hand, three non-Otx elements derived from the spec2a enhancer are needed together with Otx sites for specifically aboral ectoderm expression. A DNA element termed Y/CBF, lying just downstream from an Otx site within the spec2a enhancer, mediates general activation in the ectoderm. A second element lying between the Otx and Y/CBF sites, called OER, functions to prevent expression in the oral ectoderm. A third site, called ENR, overlapping another Otx site, is required to repress endoderm expression. Three distinct DNA binding proteins interact sequence specifically at the Y/CBF, OER, and ENR elements. The spec2a enhancer thus consists of closely linked activator and repressor elements that function collectively to cause expression of the spec2a gene in the aboral ectoderm.

Cis-regulatory logic in the endo16 gene: switching from a specification to a differentiation mode of control.

The endo16 gene of Strongylocentrotus purpuratus encodes a secreted protein of the embryonic and larval midgut. The overall functional organization of the spatial and temporal control system of this gene are relatively well known from a series of earlier cis-regulatory studies. Our recent computational model for the logic operations of the proximal region of the endo16 control system (Module A) specifies the function of interactions at each transcription factor target site of Module A. Here, we extend sequence level functional analysis to the adjacent cis-regulatory region, Module B. The computational logic model is broadened to include B/A interactions as well as other Module B functions. Module B drives expression later in development and its major activator is responsible for a sharp, gut-specific increase in transcription after gastrulation. As shown earlier, Module B output undergoes a synergistic amplification that requires interactions within Module A. The interactions within Module B that are required to generate and transmit its output to Module A are identified. Logic considerations predicted an internal cis-regulatory switch by which spatial control of endo16 expression is shifted from Module A (early) to Module B (later). This prediction was confirmed experimentally and a distinct set of interactions in Module B that mediate the switch function was demonstrated. The endo16 computational model now provides a detailed explanation of the information processing functions executed by the cis-regulatory system of this gene throughout embryogenesis. Early in development the gene participates in the specification events that define the endomesoderm; later it functions as a gut-specific differentiation gene. The cis-regulatory switch mediates this functional change.

Genomic cis-regulatory logic: experimental and computational analysis of a sea urchin gene.

The genomic regulatory network that controls gene expression ultimately determines form and function in each species. The operational nature of the regulatory programming specified in cis-regulatory DNA sequence was determined from a detailed functional analysis of a sea urchin control element that directs the expression of a gene in the endoderm during development. Spatial expression and repression, and the changing rate of transcription of this gene, are mediated by a complex and extended cis-regulatory system. The system may be typical of developmental cis-regulatory apparatus. All of its activities are integrated in the proximal element, which contains seven target sites for DNA binding proteins. A quantitative computational model of this regulatory element was constructed that explicitly reveals the logical interrelations hard-wired into the DNA.

Quantitative functional interrelations within the cis-regulatory system of the S. purpuratus Endo16 gene.

Embryonic expression of the Endo16 gene of Strongylocentrotus purpuratus is controlled by interactions with at least 13 different DNA-binding factors. These interactions occur within a cis-regulatory domain that extends about 2300 bp upstream from the transcription start site. A recent functional characterization of this domain reveals six different subregions, or cis-regulatory modules, each of which displays a specific regulatory subfunction when linked with the basal promoter and in some cases various other modules (C.-H. Yuh and E. Davidson (1996) Development 122, 1069-1082). In the present work, we analyzed quantitative time-course measurements of the CAT enzyme output of embryos bearing expression constructs controlled by various Endo16 regulatory modules, either singly or in combination. Three of these modules function positively in that, in isolation, each is capable of promoting expression in vegetal plate and adjacent cell lineages, though with different temporal profiles of activity. Models for the mode of interaction of the three positive modules with one another were tested by assuming mathematical relations that would generate, from the measured single module time courses, the experimentally observed profiles of activity obtained when the relevant modules are physically linked in the same construct. The generated and observed time functions were compared, and the differences were minimized by least squares adjustment of a scale parameter. When the modules were tested in context of the endogenous promoter region, one of the positive modules (A) was found to increase the output of the others (B and G), by a constant factor. In contrast, a solution in which the time-course data of modules A and B are multiplied by one another was required for the interrelations of the positive modules when a minimal SV40 promoter was used. One interpretation is that, in this construct, each module independently stimulates the basal transcription complex. We used a similar approach to analyze the repressive activity of the three Endo16 cis-regulatory modules that act negatively in controlling spatial expression. The evidence obtained confirms that the repressive modules act only by affecting the output of module A (C.-H. Yuh and E. Davidson (1996) Development 122, 1069-1082). A new hierarchical model of the cis-regulatory system was formulated in which module A plays a central integrating role, and which also implies specific functions for certain DNA-binding sites within the basal promoter fragment of the gene. Additional kinetic experiments were then carried out, and key aspects of the model were confirmed.

Modular cis-regulatory organization of developmentally expressed genes: two genes transcribed territorially in the sea urchin embryo, and additional examples.

The cis-regulatory systems that control developmental expression of two sea urchin genes have been subjected to detailed functional analysis. Both systems are modular in organization: specific, separable fragments of the cis-regulatory DNA each containing multiple transcription factor target sites execute particular regulatory subfunctions when associated with reporter genes and introduced into the embryo. The studies summarized here were carried out on the CyIIIa gene, expressed in the embryonic aboral ectoderm and on the Endo16 gene, expressed in the embryonic vegetal plate, archenteron, and then midgut. The regulatory systems of both genes include modules that control particular aspects of temporal and spatial expression, and in both the territorial boundaries of expression depend on a combination of negative and positive functions. In both genes different regulatory modules control early and late embryonic expression. Modular cis-regulatory organization is widespread in developmentally regulated genes, and we present a tabular summary that includes many examples from mouse and Drosophila. We regard cis-regulatory modules as units of developmental transcription control, and also of evolution, in the assembly of transcription control systems.

Modular cis-regulatory organization of Endo16, a gut-specific gene of the sea urchin embryo.

The Endo16 gene of Strongylocentrotus purpuratus is expressed at the blastula stage of embryogenesis throughout the vegetal plate, at the gastrula stage in the whole of the archenteron and in postgastrular stages only in the midgut. We showed earlier that a 2300 bp upstream sequence suffices to faithfully recreate this pattern of expression when fused to a CAT reporter gene. Here we define the functional organization of this cis-regulatory domain, which includes over thirty high specificity binding sites, serviced by at least thirteen different putative transcription factors, in addition to >20 sites for a factor commonly found in the regulatory sequences of other sea urchin genes as well (SpGCF1). The Endo16 cis-regulatory domain consists of several different functional elements, or modules, each containing one or two unique DNA-binding factor target sites, plus sites for factors binding in other modules as well. Modular regulatory function was defined in experiments in which regions of the cis-regulatory DNA containing specific clusters of sites were tested in isolation, combined with one another, or by selective deletion, and the effects on expression of the CAT reporter were determined by whole-mount in situ hybridization or CAT enzyme activity measurements. The most proximal module (A) is mainly responsible for early embryonic expression, and module A alone suffices to locate expression in the vegetal plate and archenteron. The adjacent module (B) is responsible for a steep postgastrular rise in expression, when the gene is transcribed only in the midgut and, prior to this module B alone also suffices to promote expression in the vegetal plate and archenteron. The most distal module, G, acts as a booster for either A or B modules. However, no combination of A, B and G modules generates vegetal plate or gut expression exclusively. Ectopic expression of A-, B- and G-CAT fusion constructs occurs in the adjacent (veg1-derived) ectoderm and in skeletogenic mesenchyme cells. For expression to be confined to endoderm requires negative regulatory functions mediated by modules E, F and DC. Modules E and F each repress ectopic expression specifically in veg1 ectoderm. Module DC represses ectopic expression specifically in skeletogenic mesenchyme. Expression of some Endo16 constructs is dramatically increased by treatment with LiCl, which expands the territory in which the endogenous Endo16 gene is expressed at the expense of veg1 ectoderm. The same modules that act to repress ectopic expression in untreated embryos are required for enhanced expression of constructs after LiC1 treatment. Furthermore, both the negative spatial control functions and response to LiC1 require the presence of module A. The total regulatory requirements of the Endo16 gene during embryogenesis can be expressed in terms of the positive and negative functions of the individual modules and the interactions between modules that are identified in this study.

The hepatitis B virus X protein increases the cellular level of TATA-binding protein, which mediates transactivation of RNA polymerase III genes.

The hepatitis B virus X gene product transactivates a variety of cellular and viral genes. The mechanism for X induction of RNA polymerase (pol) III genes was investigated. By using Drosophila S-2 cells stably transformed with the X gene, the transient expression of a tRNA gene is enhanced. Comparing the transcriptional activities of extracts derived from these cells, all three types of RNA pol III promoters are stimulated by X. Interestingly, both S-2 and rat 1A cells stably transformed with the X gene produce increased cellular levels of the TATA-binding protein (TBP). By using various kinase inhibitors, it was found that the X-mediated increases in both transcription and TBP are dependent upon protein kinase C activation. Since TBP is a subunit of TFIIIB, the activity of this component fractionated from extracts derived from control and X-transformed cells was analyzed. These studies reveal that TFIIIB activity is substantially more limiting in control cells and that TFIIIB isolated from X-transformed cells has increased activity in reconstitution assays compared with TFIIIB isolated from control cells. Conversely, comparison of TFIIIC from control and X-transformed cell extracts revealed that there is relatively little change in its ability either to reconstitute transcription or to bind to DNA and that there is no change in the catalytic activity of RNA pol III. Studies were performed to determine whether directly increasing cellular TBP alone could enhance RNA pol III gene transcription. Transient expression of a TBP cDNA in rat 1A cells was capable of stimulating transcription activity from the resultant extracts in vitro. Together, these results demonstrate that one mechanism by which X mediates transactivation of RNA poll III genes is by increasing limiting TBP via the activation of cellular signaling pathways. The discovery that X increases cellular TBP, the universal transcription factor, provides a novel mechanism for the function of a viral transactivator protein and may explain the ability of X to produce such large and diverse effects on cellular gene expression.

Complexity and organization of DNA-protein interactions in the 5'-regulatory region of an endoderm-specific marker gene in the sea urchin embryo.

This study concerns the organization of sites of specific DNA/protein interaction within the regulatory domain of the Endo16 gene of Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. Earlier work had displayed a complex pattern of expression of this gene during embryogenesis. Endo16 transcripts are confined to the definitive vegetal plate in blastula stage embryos; at gastrula stage this gene is expressed throughout the archenteron, but later only in the midgut. In this work we exploited the exceptional experimental accessibility of the sea urchin embryo, with respect to both functional assays of gene regulatory systems and to characterization of transcription factors, in order to approach a complete description of potential Endo16 regulatory interactions. Accurate expression of an Endo16 fusion gene was obtained with a 2200-nucleotide (nt) upstream fragment of the gene. We present a map locating high specificity target sites for DNA-binding proteins within the 2200-nt Endo16 regulatory domain, and an assessment of the complexity of the set of putative Endo16 transcription factors that we have been able to recover from 24-h (blastula stage) nuclear extract. Protein binding sites were initially mapped by gel shift reactions carried out on nested sets of end-labeled restriction fragments, and then to finer resolution by oligonucleotide gel shift competitions. Thirty-eight sites of high specificity DNA-protein interaction were thus identified. Appropriate oligonucleotides were then used for partial purification of the DNA-binding proteins by affinity chromatography. DNA-binding proteins specific for each target site were identified by molecular weight, using southwestern blotting procedures and two-dimensional gel shift separations, and by directly renaturing and reacting with oligonucleotide probes specific proteins that had been resolved by SDS-PAGE from selected affinity column fractions. A complete series of gel shift cross-competitions amongst the target sites was carried out. We conclude that nine different protein factors are bound at unique sites within the Endo16 regulatory domain. Multiple target sites for five other proteins account for the remaining binding site locations. The target sites appear to be organized in a sequence of clusters, focused on the unique factors. The high complexity of the Endo16 gene regulatory system may be characteristic for genes that are spatially regulated in early embryonic development.

Differentiated liver cell specificity of the second enhancer of hepatitis B virus.

Hepatitis B virus is a hepatotropic virus. Its replication and gene expression are mainly restricted to hepatocytes in the infective process. The viral gene expression thus provides a unique system with which to study the control of tissue-specific gene expression. We have previously reported the identification and characterization of the second enhancer (enhancer II) of hepatitis B virus. In this report, we further demonstrate that the minimal functional constituents of the second enhancer, box alpha and box beta, display liver cell and differentiation state specificity. Moreover, box alpha exhibits the same liver cell and differentiation state specificity when functioning as an upstream regulator for the basal core promoter. Gel shift experiments reveal a unique box alpha-binding protein, protein a, which is present only in differentiated liver cells, where enhancer II is functional. The converse is true for another box alpha-binding protein, protein f, which is present only in poorly differentiated liver cells and nonliver cells. The simplest hypothesis that explains these results is that protein a activates and/or protein f suppresses the enhancer and upstream regulator functions. Although C/EBP is a candidate for a transcription factor that interacts with box alpha or box beta, none of the binding factors identified in the gel shift assays, including protein a and protein f, is likely to be C/EBP because they differ from C/EBP in heat lability and sequence preference.

Transcriptional regulation of precore and pregenomic RNAs of hepatitis B virus.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, either acute or chronic, has been one of the leading health problems in the world. To understand the HBV life cycle and disease process, we set out to study the regulation of viral gene expression. In this paper, we report the characterization of the HBV core promoter: two 3.5-kb transcripts, precore and pregenomic, are made from it. The latter is itself a template for viral genome replication and also encodes viral proteins essential for both viral replication and virion assembly. We identify a short sequence (from nucleotides [nt] 1744 to 1851, referred to as the basic core promoter [BCP]) that is sufficient to direct correct initiation of both precore and pregenomic messages. In addition, the two appear to be regulated in a coordinate manner. Sequences upstream of the BCP (from nt 1636 to 1744, referred to as the core upstream regulatory sequence [CURS]), have a strong stimulating effect on the BCP. Addition of the CURS to the BCP leads to a dramatic increase in both the transcription of two 3.5-kb messages and the production of 42-nm virions from transiently transfected hepatoma cells. The CURS stimulates the BCP in a position- and orientation-dependent manner. Therefore, it is unlikely that the effect is mediated through enhancer II, which has been localized to the same sequence. Deletion analysis of the CURS suggests that it contains multiple regulatory elements that control the BCP in an interactive manner. In accord with this hypothesis, the CURS is found to be bound with many distinct protein factors in footprinting experiments. Among these elements, box alpha (from nt 1646 to 1668) and box gamma delta (from nt 1671 to 1703) are two regulatory elements which individually stimulate promoter activity more than 100-fold.

C/EBP-like proteins binding to the functional box-alpha and box-beta of the second enhancer of hepatitis B virus.

The second enhancer (enhancer II) of hepatitis B virus is functionally liver specific. Located within an open reading frame of the virus and immediately upstream of the initiation sites of viral major transcripts, enhancer II furnishes a unique model for use in investigating the structure and function of an enhancer. In this study, two functional constituents, a 23-bp box-alpha and a 12-bp box-beta, are identified as being both necessary and sufficient for enhancer II function. Examination of the box-alpha and box-beta sequences reveals a weak homology to the extended consensus for a C/EBP binding site. Gel shift and footprinting analyses indicate that multiple proteins bind to these sequences and thus are candidate transcription factors that mediate the enhancer function. One heat-resistant protein, protein a, and one heat-sensitive protein, protein b, bind to box-alpha. Protein a, which binds to box-alpha in a way indistinguishable from that seen with a recombinant C/EBP, appears not to be identical to C/EBP in that the binding of protein a requires a minimal sequence larger than the canonical C/EBP sites. Two box-beta-binding proteins, c and d, show greater affinity for the C/EBP consensus than for box-beta. However, both proteins c and d are relatively heat sensitive and display a distinct sequence preference from the recombinant C/EBP protein. Since the function of enhancer II is strictly dependent on a bipartite architecture, this system provides a unique model for studies of how the interactions of its binding proteins lead to the enhancer function.

The genome of hepatitis B virus contains a second enhancer: cooperation of two elements within this enhancer is required for its function.

Previous studies have identified an enhancer (enhancer I) at nucleotides (nt) 1074 to 1234 in the genome of the human hepatitis B virus (HBV), which locates immediately upstream from the X gene. By analysis of the expression of the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene driven by a heterologous simian virus 40 early promoter, we describe the identification of a second enhancer (enhancer II) at nt 1636 to 1741, which locates downstream of enhancer I and immediately upstream of the core gene. With various deletions at the 5' end of enhancer II, a positive regulatory element was identified at nt 1636 to 1690 (the II-A element), with the 5' boundary between nt 1636 and 1671. The II-A element alone did not have an enhancer function, but the enhancer activity was achieved by the concomitant presence of the sequence from nt 1704 to 1741 (the II-B element). The II-B element alone did not have enhancer activity. These results indicate that cooperation between the II-A and II-B elements is required to exhibit the enhancer activity of enhancer II. We also show that enhancer II stimulates the transcriptional activity of both the SPI and SPII promoters of the surface gene. Therefore, the SPI promoter activity is regulated by the proximal HNF-1 binding element and the distal enhancers I and II. These results indicate that multiple regulatory elements scattered over the whole viral genome are involved in the regulation of expression of each individual HBV gene and that the same regulatory element controls the expression of different HBV genes. The relative positions of these regulatory elements in the HBV genome suggest that they may control the expression of HBV genes in a coordinate and cooperative manner.

A liver-specific nuclear factor interacts with the promoter region of the large surface protein gene of human hepatitis B virus.

The outer envelope of the 42-nm virion of the human hepatitis B virus (HBV) is composed of the large, the middle, and the major surface proteins. Whereas the middle and the major surface proteins are transcribed from the SPII promoter of the pre-S/S gene, the large surface protein is transcribed from the SPI promoter located upstream of SPII. We have previously shown that transcription of SPI (comprising nucleotides [nt] -380 to +17) occurs preferentially in differentiated hepatoma cell lines (H.K. Chang and L.P. Ting, Virology 170:176-183, 1989). In this report, we further demonstrated that a sequence of 95 base pairs in the upstream region of SPI (nt -95 to +17) was necessary and sufficient for such preferential expression in differentiated hepatoma cells. By analysis of the expression of the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene in a series of mutants with deletions at the 5' end of SPI, we identified a positive transcriptional cis-acting element mapping at nt -95 to -72 which appears to play a key role in the regulation of the expression of the large surface protein. This region shared a high degree of sequence homology with regulatory sequences of several liver-specific genes from human, mouse, and rat, with a consensus sequence (G/A)GTTA(A/C)TNNT(C/T)NNC(A/C). We further identified a nuclear factor present in the nuclear extracts of differentiated human hepatoma cell lines which interacted specifically with this element of the SPI promoter. This nuclear factor was similar to the rat liver-specific factor HNF-1, since an oligonucleotide containing the recognition sequence of HNF-1 could efficiently compete for the human factor in a footprinting assay. The sequence at nt -93 to -68 which was bound by this factor in SPI was termed the HNF-1-binding element. Activation of the SPI promoter by human differentiated hepatocyte nuclear factor 1, described in this report, probably explains, first, the formation of the 42-nm virion specifically in liver but not in several other tissues despite the synthesis of the middle and the major surface proteins in those tissues, and second, why only differentiated hepatoma cell lines are able to produce 42-nm-like virion particles on transfection by HBV DNA.