The process of care in preventive in-home comprehensive geriatric assessment.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the process of care of a program of in-home comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) and to determine: (1) if there are major findings in all domains of CGA (medical, functional, mental health, and social/ environmental), (2) if there is a continued clinical yield when CGA is repeated annually, and (3) factors that affect patient adherence with recommendations from CGA. DESIGN: Descriptive prospective study of subjects allocated to the intervention group of a 3-year randomized trial of preventive in-home CGA. SETTING: Homes of participants living in an urban setting. PARTICIPANTS: Persons aged 75 years or older and living at home who received the intervention (N = 202 subjects, mean age 80.8 years, 70% female, 95% white, 64% living alone). INTERVENTION: Annual in-home CGA and quarterly home visits by gerontologic nurse practitioners for 3 years. MEASUREMENTS: Detailed data were collected prospectively on clinical problems detected by CGA, and specific recommendations were made for these problems using an instrument developed explicitly for this project to study the CGA process. Subject adherence with these recommendations was also recorded. RESULTS: Major problems were identified in all domains of CGA; the most common problems were medical. In the first year, 76.7% of subjects had at least one major problem identified that was either previously unknown or suboptimally treated. One-third of subjects had additional major problems identified during the second and third years. A constant number of therapeutic and preventive recommendations was made each year (11.5 per subject annually). Subject adherence varied by type of recommendation (ANOVA, F = 108.4, P < .001); adherence was better for referrals to a physician than for referrals to a non-physician professional or community service or for recommendations involving self-care activities (Scheffe's test, P < .001). CONCLUSION: In these community-dwelling older people, there was a continued yield of problems identified and recommendations made when CGA was repeated annually for 3 years, supporting the practice of repeat CGA in older people in the community. Subject adherence with recommendations from CGA varied by type of recommendation, but further work is needed to determine additional factors that affect this adherence and to determine the association between the yield of CGA (i.e., problems identified, recommendations given and adherence with these recommendations) and important clinical outcomes.

A trial of annual in-home comprehensive geriatric assessments for elderly people living in the community.

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: The prevention of disability in elderly people poses a challenge for health care and social services. We conducted a three-year, randomized, controlled trial of the effect of annual in-home comprehensive geriatric assessment and follow-up for people living in the community who were 75 years of age or older. The 215 people in the intervention group were seen at home by gerontologic nurse practitioners who, in collaboration with geriatricians, evaluated problems and risk factors for disability, gave specific recommendations, and provided health education. The 199 people in the control group received their regular medical care. The main outcome measures were the prevention of disability, defined as the need for assistance in performing the basic activities of daily living (bathing, dressing, feeding, grooming, transferring from bed to chair, and moving around inside the house) or the instrumental activities of daily living (e.g., cooking, handling finances and medication, housekeeping, and shopping), and the prevention of nursing home admissions. RESULTS: At three years, 20 people in the intervention group (12 percent of 170 surviving participants) and 32 in the control group (22 percent of 147 surviving participants) required assistance in performing the basic activities of daily living (adjusted odds ratio, 0.4; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.2 to 0.8; P = 0.02). The number of persons who were dependent on assistance in performing the instrumental activities of daily living but not the basic activities did not differ significantly between the two groups. Nine people in the intervention group (4 percent) and 20 in the control group (10 percent) were permanently admitted to nursing homes (P = 0.02). Acute care hospital admissions and short-term nursing home admissions did not differ significantly between the two groups. In the second and third years of the study, there were significantly more visits to physicians among the participants in the intervention group than among those in the control group (mean number of visits per month, 1.41 in year 2 and 1.27 in year 3 in the intervention group, as compared with 1.11 and 0.92 visits, respectively, in the control group; P = 0.007 and P = 0.001, respectively). The cost of the intervention for each year of disability-free life gained was about $46,000. CONCLUSIONS: A program of in-home comprehensive geriatric assessments can delay the development of disability and reduce permanent nursing home stays among elderly people living at home.

A home-based geriatric assessment, follow-up and health promotion program: design, methods, and baseline findings from a 3-year randomized clinical trial.

Controlled trials in a number of countries have documented benefits from different types of in-home assessment and treatment programs for various subgroups of elderly persons. We have developed a program to test, using a randomized controlled design, the concepts of in-home comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) coupled with follow-up, health education, and preventive care in an urban United States community. The intervention includes yearly in-home CGA by geriatric nurse practitioners (GNPs), who provide, following discussions with physician geriatricians, lists of specific recommendations for health and well-being enhancement. The GNPs provide follow-up visits quarterly and regular telephone contacts to improve compliance. We recruited for our trial 414 home-living subjects aged 75 years and over, 215 randomized to the intervention group and 199 to the control group. Subjects were generally representative of the overall elderly population of the city of Santa Monica, a seaside suburb of Los Angeles. Extensive baseline data (medical, functional, psychosocial and environmental) were collected from subjects prior to randomization, using validated instruments whenever possible. Follow-up data were collected from each subject every 4 months by trained research assistants throughout the 3-year intervention follow-up period. Our study was designed to assess effects of the intervention on the hypothesized outcomes of health status, functional status, psychosocial parameters, and service utilization. Careful documentation of the intervention will enhance our ability to make process-outcome comparisons. Preliminary analysis reveals that the in-home CGA uncovered many important health deficits for most subjects resulting in a number of substantial recommendations. We are confident that when it is completed, this study will succeed in answering important remaining questions about the feasibility and effectiveness of establishing a geriatric in-home prevention and health promotion program in the United States based on principles of CGA.