ABSTRACT
Background and ObjectivePoint-of-care type molecular diagnostic tests have been used for detecting SARS-CoV-2, although their clinical utility with nasal samples has yet to be established. This study evaluated the clinical performance of the cobas Liat SARS-CoV-2 & Influenza AB (Liat) in nasal samples. MethodsNasal and nasopharyngeal samples were collected and were tested using the Liat, the cobas 6800 system and the cobas SARS-CoV-2 & Influenza AB (cobas), and a method developed by National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Japan (NIID). ResultsA total of 814 nasal samples were collected. The Liat assay was positive for SARS-CoV-2 in 113 (13.9%). The total, positive, and negative concordance rate between the Liat and cobas/NIID assays were 99.3%/98.4%, 99.1%/100%, and 99.3%/98.2%, respectively. Five samples were positive only using the Liat assay. Their Ct values ranged from 31.9 to 37.2. The Ct values of the Liat assay were significantly lower (p < 0.001) but were correlated (p < 0.001) with those of other molecular assays. In the participants who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 on the Liat assay using nasopharyngeal samples, 88.2% of their nasal samples also tested positive using the Liat assay. ConclusionThe Liat assay showed high concordance with other molecular assays in nasal samples. Some discordance occurred in samples with Ct values > 30 on the Liat assay. Key PointsO_LIThe cobas Liat SARS-CoV-2 & Influenza AB assay showed high concordance with other molecular assays in nasal and nasopharyngeal samples, providing results within 20 minutes. C_LIO_LISome discordance occurred in samples with Ct values > 30 on the Liat assay. C_LIO_LIThe Liat assay may be suitable for use in a variety of clinical situations, primarily where accurate detection of SARS-CoV-2 is necessary. C_LI
ABSTRACT
Objective:It is well known that the use of benzodiazepines is associated with falling in elderly people, but there have been few researches focused on changes in the dose of benzodiazepines and falls. If the association between changes in the dose of benzodiazepines and falling becomes clear, we may take an action to prevent falling.In this study, we investigated the association between changes in the dose of benzodiazepines and falling among elderly inpatients in an acute-care hospital.<br>Design:Falling generally results from an interaction of multiple and diverse risk factors and situations, and medication history of each subject must be considered in this study. We conducted a case-crossover study in which a case was used as his/her own control at different time periods. Therefore covariates that were not time-dependent were automatically adjusted in this study.<br>Methods:Subjects were patients who had falling at one hospital between April 1, 2008 and November 30, 2009. Data were collected from incident report forms and medical records. Odds ratio for changes in the dose of benzodiazepines were calculated using conditional logistic regression analyses.<br>Results:A total of 422 falling by elderly people were eligible for this study. The odds ratio for increased amounts of benzodiazepines was 2.02(95% Confidence Interval(CI):1.15, 3.56). On the other hand, the odds ratio for decreased amounts of benzodiazepines was 1.11(95%CI:0.63,1.97).<br>Conclusion:There was an association between increased amounts of benzodiazepines and falling. Hence, it is considered meaningful to pay attention to falling when amounts of benzodiazepines are increased to prevent falling in hospitals.
