Improved Outcomes When Home-Dose Carbidopa-Levodopa Is Continued in the Geriatric Emergency Department in Patients With Parkinson's Disease.

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a debilitating condition that affects 1.8% of people 65 years of age and older. Patients with PD often require hospitalization and are frequently admitted through the emergency department (ED). Notably, their hospital durations tend to be lengthier compared with patients without PD. The primary outcome of this research was to compare the length of stay (LOS) of patients who received carbidopa-levodopa (CL) in the ED with those who did not. Secondary outcomes included 30-day-readmission rates and administration of injectable for agitation. In addition, the percentage of patients receiving CL before and after an information management technology (IMT) alert implementation was compared in a sub-analysis. Patients that received CL during their inpatient stay were identified by a database report in this retrospective study. Patients were excluded if they were not admitted through the ED, younger than 65 years of age, or admitted to the intensive care unit after the ED. There was a total of 266 in the control group and 217 patients in the intervention group. The intervention group had a significantly shorter LOS than the control group (3.29 vs 5.37 days; P = 0.002), significantly less frequent 30-day readmissions (P = 0.032), and used fewer injectables for agitation (P = 0.035). The sub-analysis of the IMT alert revealed that prior to the alert's implementation, 28.5% of patients received CL in the ED; whereas post-alert, this percentage increased to 91.4% (P < 0.001). The results of this study found that the group of PD patients who received CL in the ED had shorter LOS, lower 30-day readmissions, and used less injectables for agitation compared with the group that did not receive CL in the ED. This improvement is possibly due to continuity of CL supply considering its short half-life and clinical importance for PD.

Utilization of Lower-Dose Cyclobenzaprine in the Older Inpatient.

Background In older inpatients, anticholinergic medications can increase the risk of complications that may increase length of stay (LOS). Cyclobenzaprine is an anticholinergic medication associated with mental status changes, falls, and injuries in older patients. Objective The purpose of this study is to determine whether use of a lower cyclobenzaprine dose (5 mg) compared with higher dosing (10 mg) will affect LOS, 30-day readmission rates, and need for injectable psychotropic agents in inpatients 65 years of age and older. Methods This was a retrospective cohort analysis comparing outcomes in patients 65 years of age and older who received either a 5 mg or 10 mg cyclobenzaprine dose during their inpatient admission over a 2.5-year period. The primary outcome was hospital LOS, adjusted using multivariate linear regression. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission rate adjusted using logistic regression and use of injectable antipsychotics or benzodiazepines. A sub-analysis evaluated the impact of the institution's implementation of a geriatric prescribing context (GEM-CON) on cyclobenzaprine dose selection. Results The adjusted LOS was 32.7% longer (95% CI 25.9%-39.9%) for patients exposed to higher-dose cyclobenzaprine. Use of injectable antipsychotics or benzodiazepines was also significantly greater in the higher-dose group (P < 0.001; P = 0.025). Cyclobenzaprine dose was not significantly associated with readmission on multivariate analysis (OR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.45-1.93). After GEM-CON implementation, there was a significant increase in use of the recommended lower cyclobenzaprine dose (P < 0.001). Conclusion Use of lower cyclobenzaprine dosing in older inpatients is associated with reduced hospital LOS and need for injectable antipsychotics and benzodiazepines.

Pharmacist Involvement in an Acute Care of the Elderly Team: Impact on Appropriate Medication Use.

Background Currently, our institution does not have a full-time pharmacist rounding with the inpatient acute care of the elderly (ACE) team daily. We sought to evaluate the involvement of a clinical pharmacy service within the ACE team and its impact on appropriate medication use. Objective The primary outcome was the number of drug-related problems (DRPs) and potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) detected by the pharmacist compared with no pharmacist on the ACE team. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, 30-day re-hospitalization, and accepted DRPs and PIMs recommendations made by the pharmacist. Methods This was a retrospective, single-center, cohort study. The control cohort consisted of patients seen over 3 months when no pharmacist was present. The intervention cohort comprised patients seen over 3 months when a pharmacist was present on the ACE team. Patients were excluded if there was not a documented chart note from a geriatric provider or pharmacist. Results A total of 125 patients were included in the intervention group and 106 patients in the control group. Regarding the primary outcome, the control cohort had significantly fewer identified PIMs and DRPs in comparison with the intervention cohort (P < 0.001; P < 0.01, respectively). There was no significant difference in length of stay (P = 0.317). There was a statistical difference between groups regarding 30-day readmission rates (P = 0.007). Conclusion Our study shows that the inclusion of a pharmacist on the ACE team was associated with more DRPs, and PIMs identified, creating a positive impact on patient care and 30-day readmission.

Factors Associated with Acute Injurious Falls in Elderly Hospitalized Patients: A Multicenter Descriptive Study.

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Hospital-Acquired Conditions (CMS-HAC) links Medicare payments to health care quality. Experiencing a serious disability or death associated with a fall in a health care facility based on diagnosis codes has been identified as an opportunity for improvement. Multiple factors contribute to an inpatient fall, including medications that affect cognition in older adults. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the commonly prescribed classes of medications on the CMS-HAC falls and trauma definition in US hospitals in a large inpatient database from 2019 to 2021. METHODS: The authors analyzed data from 835 hospitals in the Vizient Clinical Data Base between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2021, on patients ≥ 65 years of age with CMS-HAC patient falls and trauma codes. Using logistic regression and stepwise Poisson regression analysis, the authors identified demographic, clinical, and hospital-related variables associated with falls meeting the CMS-HAC definition. The top 20 prescribed drug classes in these patients were also identified. RESULTS: Among 11,064,024 patient encounters, 5,978 met the CMS-HAC definition of a serious fall. Patients who experienced a serious fall were significantly more likely to be > 79 years of age (p < 0.001, odds ratio [OR] 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-1.37), have a history of prior falls (p < 0.001, OR 2.30, 95% CI 2.11-2.50), have a code for dementia (p < 0.001, OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.40-1.60), and have higher anticholinergic cognitive burden (ACB) scores (p < 0.001, OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.13-1.14). Specific medication classes associated with CMS-HAC falls were first-generation antihistamines (p < 0.00, OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.09-1.35), second-generation antihistamines (p ≤ 0.001, OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.13-1.19), and atypical antipsychotics (p < 0.001, OR 1.18, CI 1.13-1.29). CONCLUSION: Patients who experience a fall meeting the CMS-HAC fall definition are significantly more likely to have a prior history of falling, dementia, and a higher ACB score. Results from this study may inform future quality improvement work aimed at reducing injurious falls.

Optimal Injectable Haloperidol Dose Assessment in the Older Hospitalized Inpatient.

BACKGROUND: Haloperidol can be used off-label for agitation and/or delirium in older individuals. The recommended initial intramuscular or intravenous dose is 0.5 to 1 mg. However, the evidence to support these doses is nominal. OBJECTIVES: The primary outcome was to determine whether low-dose injectable haloperidol (≤0.5 mg) was similar in effect to higher doses by assessing the need for repeat doses within 4 hours as a surrogate marker. Secondary outcomes include comparison of length of stay, utilization of restraints, and discharge outcomes between dosage groups. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center, cohort study. Patients aged ≥65 years who received haloperidol injectable who were not on antipsychotics prior to admission were reviewed. RESULTS: In the low-dose group (n = 15), no patients required additional haloperidol doses within 4 hours compared with 1 patient each in the medium-dose (n = 23) and high-dose (n = 19) groups (P = 0.94). There was a difference regarding length of stay, utilization of restraints, and discharge to facility when admitted from home favoring low-dose haloperidol. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: While limited by sample size and retrospective design, patients who received low-dose haloperidol demonstrated similar efficacy to those who received higher doses of haloperidol. In addition, secondary outcomes mentioned above favored the use of low-dose haloperidol as well. Based on these findings, low-dose haloperidol is a reasonable initial dose for the agitated older patient.

Mirabegron Associated Angioedema: A Case Report.

Purpose: To review a case of angioedema associated with mirabegron. Summary: A 77-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with swelling of the left anterior side of the tongue beginning 90 minutes prior to arrival. She noticed tingling on her tongue while eating a hamburger, chips, and ice cream. The patient had no history of medication-related allergies. Home medications include acetaminophen, aspirin, biotin, black cohosh, Co-enzyme Q-10, cranberry, fish oil, multivitamin, alendronate, and mirabegron all taken orally. The patient reports being on mirabegron for 3 to 4 years but recently decided to self-taper off the medication. Her initial laboratory test results were unremarkable. The patient was diagnosed with left tongue angioedema, and she received methylprednisolone, epinephrine, famotidine, and 2 units of plasma. After medication administration, the patient underwent a flexible nasopharyngeal laryngoscopy resulting in no significant angioedema in the pharynx and hypopharynx with a small area of possible edema noted on the right base of tongue/lingual tonsil. Patient's symptoms improved with medication treatment and discontinuation of mirabegron. The use of Naranjo et al. adverse-event probability scale revealed that mirabegron was the possible (score of 4) cause of the patient's left tongue angioedema. Conclusion: A 77-year-old woman developed drug induced tongue angioedema associated with mirabegron after being compliant on this medication for 3 to 4 years. Patient was self-tapering her dose of mirabegron. This patient responded well to medication treatment and discontinuation of drug. To our knowledge, this is the second case report of mirabegron induced angioedema.

Aducanumab for Alzheimer's Disease: Summarized Data From EMERGE, ENGAGE, and PRIME Studies.

Objective To review the data informing the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for aducanumab for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and mild Alzheimer's disease (AD). Data Sources At the time of writing there were no peer-reviewed published studies on aducanumab. All data presented are derived directly from the material Biogen submitted to the FDA for approval. The three studies that will be reviewed are: Multiple Dose Study of Aducanumab in Participants With Prodromal or Mild AD (PRIME), 221AD302 Phase 3 Study of Aducanumab in Early AD (EMERGE), 221AD301 Phase 3 Study of Aducanumab in Early AD (ENGAGE). Data Synthesis PRIME, which was a phase 1 study, demonstrated the most common adverse drug reactions were amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), which occurred at rates up to 47% (10 mg/kg group), headache (25%), urinary tract infection (16%), and upper respiratory tract infection (19%). EMERGE demonstrated that high-dose aducanumab was clinically significant at slowing down clinical decline. However, ENGAGE was terminated early based on a futility analysis. Prior to termination ENGAGE demonstrated no clinical difference between treatment and placebo regarding the primary endpoint of slowing clinical decline. Conclusion Based on the data to date, it is difficult to accurately assess the role of aducanumab in patients with MCI or mild AD. EMERGE showed benefit with high-dose aducanumab slowing clinical decline. However, ENGAGE did not duplicate this benefit. With conflicting evidence of positive outcomes, future phase III studies are needed to confirm efficacy.

Impact of a Clinical Pharmacist Telehealth Service in a Geriatrics Assessment Clinic.

Objective Evaluate the impact of a telepharmacy service at a geriatrics assessment clinic. Design Retrospective, single-center, nonblinded cohort study. Setting Geriatrics assessment clinic. Patients The intervention/pharmacist and the control/no-pharmacist (provider) group included patients new to the clinic 50 years of age or older from over the span of 4 months. Patients who the pharmacist was unable to reach and those who missed appointments with the provider were excluded. Interventions The pharmacist phoned new patients approximately one week prior and one week after their first appointments with a provider. Main Outcome Measure Primary outcome: number of drug-related problems (DRPs) detected by the pharmacist compared with the provider. Secondary outcomes: number of medication history discrepancies, accepted medication-related recommendations, potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) deprescribed, and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) detected. Results In the intervention/pharmacist (n = 204) vs control/no pharmacist (n = 200) groups, the number of DRPs was significantly greater (338 vs 218; P = 0.031) and driven by unnecessary drug therapies, doses too high, ADRs, and drug-drug interactions (230 vs 147, P = 0.045; 37 vs 7, P = 0.010; 36 vs 17, P = 0.023; 32 vs 1, P = 0.003, respectively). The difference in number of recommendations made by the pharmacist vs medication changes made by the provider was significant: 457 vs 319, P < 0.001, respectively. Conclusions The addition of a clinical pharmacist conducting telepharmacy at a geriatrics assessment clinic had a positive impact on patient care as it relates to DRPs, deprescribing PIMs, and optimizing medication adherence.