ABSTRACT
In Thailand, antiretroviral therapy (ART) was initiated to treat human immunodeficiency virus infection and acquired immune deficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) cases using the empirical regimen with no prior genotypic test to determine drug resistance. In order to assess prevalence rate of HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) among pre-treatment cases, four rounds of survey were carried out in ART clinics, including six, eight, 33 and four ART clinics in each round during 2006-2013. For which, HIVDR testing results were available in 310, 350, 797, and 413 cases in four rounds. It was revealed that HIVDR rates among naive cases were 2.0%, 2.8%, 4.0% and 4.8%, while in experienced cases, the rates were 0, 3.3%, 11.4% and 13.9%. The rates among all cases were 1.9%, 2.9%, 4.4% and 5.6%. Resistant drugs with the highest rates among all cases in the survey round 4 were nevirapine (3.6%) and efavirenz (3.1%). The results indicated the need to continue surveillance for pre-treatment HIVDR, and posed challenges to implement activities for protecting efficacy and prolong the use of empirical first-line regimen. A strategy to apply genotyping test, in a cost-effective approach, should be considered to prepare for situation when HIVDR increases beyond a critical level.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To describe trends in Thailand's antiretroviral treatment (ART) program performance assessed by HIV drug resistance early warning indicators (EWIs), as recommended by WHO, between 2009 and 2013. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Seven EWIs were monitored, viral load (VL) testing coverage, VL suppression, retention in ART, lost to follow-up (LTFU), antiretrovirals (ARVs) dispensing practices, on-time pill pick-up, and pharmacy stock-outs. Data from ART adult patients in National Health Security Office Scheme were analyzed except for pharmacy stock-outs, which were reported from hospitals. Aggregated averages were calculated for each EWI. Chi-square for trend was applied to measure significant changes. RESULTS: By September 2013, 174,284 adults were receiving ART at 929 hospitals. Over time, improvement in VL testing coverage (53.8% in 2009 to 79.8% in 2013) was observed. VL suppression and on-time pill pick up rates were well above 90%. Rates of retention in ART declined from 84.0 to 82.9%, whereas LTFU rates increased from 8.3 to 9.2% (p<0.001). Prescriptions with inappropriate ARVs decreased from 0.32 to 0.10% (p<0.001). Of reporting hospitals, 96.1%, 96.3%, and 96.2% observed no ARVs stock-out between 2011 and 2013. CONCLUSION: EWI is a useful tool to monitor ART program performance and to identify area where improvement is needed.
