Is robotic surgery beneficial for the treatment of endometrial cancer? A comparison with conventional laparoscopic surgery.

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the oncologic outcomes between those who underwent robotic surgery or conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer. Method: We performed a retrospective review of patients from a single institution who underwent either laparoscopic or robotic surgery for the treatment of endometrial cancer between January 2010 and December 2020. Tumor characteristics, recurrence rate, disease-free survival, and overall survival were compared according to surgical approach. Results: Among the 268 patients included in this study, 95 underwent robotic surgery (35.4%) and 173 underwent laparoscopic surgery (64.6%). The median follow-up durations were 51 and 59 months for the robotic surgery and laparoscopic surgery groups, respectively (p = 0.085). The recurrence rate did not differ significantly between the two groups. (p = 0.371). Disease-free survival (p = 0.721) and overall survival (p = 0.453) were similar between the two groups. In both univariate and multivariate analyses, the type of surgery was not related to disease-free survival. The median total cost per admission was significantly higher for RS than for LS (12,123 vs. 6,884 USD, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: With consistently greater costs and similar survival outcomes, robotic systems have few advantages compared with laparoscopy.

Is there a relationship between surgical proficiency and oncologic outcome of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer?

Objective: Investigate the relationship between surgical proficiency and oncological outcomes of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with cervical cancer stage IB1, IB2 who were treated with minimally invasive radical hysterectomy from January 2010 to Dec 2020. Patients were divided into two groups based on the year of surgery: phase 1 (from January 2010 to December 2015) and phase 2 (from January 2016 to December 2020). Oncologic outcomes were compared between the groups. Results: In total, 142 patients were included in the final analysis. 73 and 69 patients underwent surgery in phase 1 (51.4%) and phase 2 (48.6%), respectively. Twelve recurrences (12/142, 8.5%) were observed in the entire cohort: ten (13.7%) in phase 1 and two (2.9%) in phase 2. The recurrence rate was significantly higher in phase 1 (p = 0.021). And the phase 1 group showed significantly shorter disease-free survival than the phase 2 group (p = 0.049). In the multivariate analysis, surgical proficiency, represented by the phase of operation, was the only significant predictor of disease-free survival (HR = 0.244, p = 0.042). Conclusions: Surgical proficiency in MIS is a significant factor associated with the outcomes in early-stage cervical cancer. More favorable outcomes can be obtained after operating on a certain number of MIS cases.

The Delay in Confirming COVID-19 Cases Linked to a Religious Group in Korea.

OBJECTIVES: As of March 3, 2020, the Shincheonji religious group accounted for the majority of Korean cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Nonetheless, the most likely cause of the broad spread of COVID-19 among members of the Shincheonji religious group remains largely unknown. METHODS: We obtained data of laboratory-confirmed cases related to the Shincheonji religious group from press releases by Korean public health authorities and news reports. We measured the period from the date of illness onset to the date of COVID-19 confirmation. RESULTS: We analysed data from 59 cases (median age, 30 years). The estimated median period between the date of symptom onset and the date of COVID-19 confirmation was 4 days (95% confidence interval, 1-12). CONCLUSIONS: There was a delay in COVID-19 confirmation from the date of illness onset among the cases linked to the Shincheonji religious group. This delay likely contributed to the occurrence of many cases of COVID-19 in the group.