Impact of a neurointensivist on outcomes in patients with head trauma treated in a neurosciences intensive care unit.

OBJECT: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a newly appointed neurointensivist on outcomes in head-injured patients in the neurological/neurosurgical intensive care unit (NICU). METHODS: The mortality rate, length of stay (LOS), and discharge disposition of all patients with head trauma who had been admitted to a 10-bed tertiary care university hospital NICU were compared between two 19-month periods, before and after the appointment of a neurointensivist. Data regarding these patients were collected using the hospital database and the University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC) database. Samples of medical records were reviewed for Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score documentation. The authors analyzed data pertaining to 328 patients before and 264 after the neurointensivist's appointment. The unadjusted mean in-hospital mortality rate increased 1.1% in the after period, but this increase was significantly lower compared with the UHC-based expected increase of 8.1% in the mortality rate during the same period (p < 0.0001). The unadjusted mean mortality rate in the NICU decreased from 13.4 to 12.9% (relative mortality rate reduction 4%) and the mean NICU LOS increased from 3.1 to 3.6 days (relative NICU LOS increase 16%), both nonsignificantly. A 51% reduction in the NICU-associated mortality rate (p = 0.01), a 12% shorter hospital LOS (p = 0.026), and 57% greater odds of being discharged to home or to rehabilitation (p = 0.009) were found in the after period in multivariate models after controlling for baseline differences between the two time periods. Better documentation of the GCS score by the NICU team was also found in the after period (from 60.4 to 82%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The institution of a neurointensivist-led team model had an independent, positive impact on patient outcomes, including a lower NICU-associated mortality rate and hospital LOS, improved disposition, and better chart documentation.

The effect of in-room registration on emergency department length of stay.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Length of stay is a measure of efficiency of delivery of care and is an important determinant of patient satisfaction in a pediatric emergency department (ED). Although length of stay is affected by many unmodifiable factors, changes in care processes may lead to improvements in throughput. Evaluating the success of such changes, however, requires an understanding of the effect of other determinants. We determine the factors associated with ED length of stay and estimate the effect of an in-room registration process on throughput time. METHODS: This was a before-and-after study at an academic pediatric ED with annual census of 45,000 visits. The study period was January 2, 2000, through December 31, 2003. In June 2003, an in-room registration process was initiated so that patients were placed directly into a room after triage, and the registration process was completed after physician evaluation. Weekly data were obtained on average length of stay and the following possible confounders: average daily ED census, hospital admissions from the ED, hospital occupancy rate, hours of physician staffing, and month of the year. An autoregressive integrated moving-average time series model was used to determine the effect of each variable on length of stay. RESULTS: Data were obtained for 209 weekly intervals during the study period; average length of stay ranged from 2.2 to 3.8 hours. All factors were highly associated with length of stay except for the number of hours of physician staffing (P =.71). The presence of in-room registration led to an estimated average decrease in length of stay of 15.0 minutes (95% confidence interval 6.3 to 33.4 minutes), or 9.3%. CONCLUSION: In-room registration leads to a statistically significant and practically meaningful improvement in total length of stay in the pediatric ED. Throughput time can be largely explained by a limited number of factors; our predictive model may facilitate the evaluation of other interventions.

Feasibility of breast duct lavage performed by a physician extender.

BACKGROUND: The safety and feasibility of ductal lavage (DL), a risk-assessment tool utilizing a minimally invasive technique that permits sampling of breast duct epithelium, performed primarily by a nurse practitioner (NP), was studied prospectively. METHODS: Women at high risk for breast cancer with a normal clinical breast exam and mammogram were enrolled. Nipple aspirate fluid (NAF)-yielding ducts were identified, cannulated, and lavaged primarily by an NP in collaboration with a breast surgeon. Samples with sufficient cellularity were categorized as benign, mild atypia, marked atypia, or malignant. Pain and adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: Thirty-seven women, with a mean age of 51.7 years, were enrolled. Thirty-one (83.8%) women yielded NAF and, of those, 28 (90.3%) had one or more ducts successfully cannulated. Of 65 lavaged ducts in these 28 women, cellularity was adequate for diagnosis in 44 (67.7%) samples. Cytologic findings were as follows: 24 benign, 15 mild atypia, 4 marked atypia, and 1 malignant. The procedure was well tolerated with a mean pain score of 3.2 (SD +/- 1.81). The most frequent adverse event was breast fullness, reported by 44.8% of the women. Two women with marked atypia were evaluated further and found to have intraductal papillomata. The woman with malignant cytology had ductal carcinoma in situ. CONCLUSION: DL is a safe, generally well-tolerated procedure that can be performed successfully by a trained NP.

Subconjunctival antibiotics for acute postcataract extraction endophthalmitis--is it necessary?

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of adjunctive subconjunctival antibiotic injection in the treatment of acute postcataract extraction endophthalmitis. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Patients who presented with hand motions or better vision and received subconjunctival antibiotics (SC+ group) were compared with those who did not (SC- group) in the treatment of acute postoperative endophthalmitis. RESULTS: The rate of obtaining a final vision of 20/40 or better was 60% in the SC+ group (n = 25) compared with 72% in the SC- group (n = 18) (P =.69), and the mean change in logMAR was -1.36 (improvement) versus -1.34 (P =.93). Based on a linear regression model controlling for presenting vision, there was no statistical difference in the mean logMAR change between the two groups (P =.73). CONCLUSION: Subconjunctival antibiotic injection as an adjunct to intravitreal antibiotics was unassociated with treatment benefit in patients with acute postoperative endophthalmitis presenting with vision of hand motions or better.