Preserving coronal knee alignment of the knee (CPAK) in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty correlates with superior patient-reported outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The optimal alignment target for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) remains controversial, and literature suggests that its impact on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) varies. The purpose of this study was to identify the relationship between changes in the coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) and PROMs in patients who underwent UKA. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 164 patients who underwent UKA was conducted. The types of CPAK types categorized into unchanged, minor (shift to an adjacent CPAK type, e.g., type I to II or type I to IV), and major changes (transitioning to a nearby diagonal CPAK type or two types across, such as type I to V or type I to III). PROMs were assessed preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively using the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) scores, Knee Society (KS) scores, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Forgotten Joint Scores (FJS). Comparison was performed between patients who experienced and who did not experience any changes in the CPAK. RESULTS: Patients with preserved native CPAK alignment demonstrated significantly superior 1 year postoperative outcomes, with higher HSS, KS knee, and WOMAC pain scores (p = 0.042, p = 0.009, and p = 0.048, respectively). Meanwhile, the degree of change in CPAK did not significantly influence the PROMs, and patients who experienced minor and major changes in the CPAK showed comparable outcomes. CONCLUSION: Preserving the native CPAK in UKA procedures is important for achieving favorable clinical outcomes at 1 year postoperative. The extent of change in the CPAK type exerted a limited impact on PROMs, thus emphasizing the importance of change in alignment itself.

Analysis of the reasons why patients cancel shoulder surgery despite recommendation.

BACKGROUND: To determine the reasons and factors that contribute to the cancellations of shoulder surgeries at a tertiary referral center and to analyze the characteristics of these patients. METHODS: Patients scheduled for shoulder surgery from June 2017 to July 2019 were allocated to a surgery group (n=224) or a cancellation group (n=96). These groups were compared with respect to patient characteristics, types of surgery, distance from patient's home to the hospital, traveling time to the hospital, and waiting period before surgery. Reasons for cancellation and responses were acquired using a telephone interview and were subsequently analyzed. RESULTS: The cancellation group was older, had a less frequent history of trauma, and had a lower proportion of patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair than the surgery group (p=0.009, p=0.014, and p=0.017, respectively). In addition, mean distance from the patients' homes to the hospital and preoperative waiting time were both longer in the cancellation group (p=0.001 and p<0.01, respectively). The most common reason given for cancellation was another medical condition (28.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Older age, need for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery, longer distance from the patient's home to the hospital, and longer waiting period significantly increased the chance of cancellation. The main reason for canceling surgery was a concurrent medical condition. Therefore, identification of other medical conditions in advance is an important consideration when surgeons recommend shoulder surgery to patients. Surgeons should also consider patient's age, type of surgery, distance from the hospital, and waiting time when assessing the possibility of surgery cancellation.

Relationships between the changes in flexion contracture and standing flexion angle of the knee and sagittal spinal alignment after total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The sagittal spinal alignment interacts with the lower extremity in patients with combined degenerative disease of the spine and lower extremity. This study aimed to clarify the relationships between the reciprocal changes in sagittal alignment of the knee, pelvis, and spine after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in osteoarthritis patients. METHODS: Prospectively, 36 patients who underwent primary TKA for severe knee osteoarthritis were enrolled. Their clinical and radiological evaluation included assessments of the knee flexion contracture (KFC) and standing knee flexion angle (KFA), as well as spinopelvic parameters and the global sagittal spinal alignment from standing whole-lower-extremity and whole-spine radiographs preoperatively and at postoperative 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Linear mixed models were used to assess the relationships between KFC/KFA and between spinopelvic/global sagittal spinal alignments. RESULTS: The KFC decreased abruptly immediately after TKA, and the correction was maintained for 2 years postoperatively. The KFA decreased gradually and approached the value of the KFC after 2 years. Of the spinopelvic parameters, sacral slope and pelvic incidence decreased significantly, in ways related to changes in KFA. There was no significant relationship between sagittal spinal alignment and postoperative changes in KFC. CONCLUSION: Although the flexion contracture was corrected immediately after TKA, the standing KFA improved gradually over 2 years. The pelvic parameters showed compensatory changes according to the KFA. The decompensated sagittal spinal malalignment was not related to a relapse in flexion contracture.