ABSTRACT
Advanced breast cancer (ABC) that is positive for hormone receptors (HRs) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a cancer subtype with distinctive characteristics. The primary treatment guidelines suggest that a combination therapy comprising anti-HER2 therapy and chemotherapy should be administered as the initial treatment for HR-positive/ HER2-positive (HR+/HER2+) ABC. However, crosstalk between the HR and HER2 pathways can partially account for the resistance of HR+/HER2+ disease to HER2-targeted therapy. This, in turn, provides a rationale for the concomitant administration of HER2-targeted therapy and endocrine therapy (ET). Many clinical studies have confirmed that the combination of HER2-targeted therapy and ET as a first-line treatment is not inferior to the combination of HER2-targeted therapy and chemotherapy, and support its use as a first-line treatment choice for HR+/HER2+ ABC. Other drugs, such as antibody-drug conjugates, cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-protein kinase B (AKT)-mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, and programmed cell death protein 1 or programmed cell death ligand 1 inhibitors, may also improve the prognosis of patients with breast cancer by blocking signaling pathways associated with tumor proliferation and break new ground for the treatment of HR+/HER2+ ABC.
ABSTRACT
Background: Patients with breast cancer (BC) may develop locoregional recurrence alone or with distant metastases. Results of previous studies discussing the benefit of local surgery among patients with chest wall disease were controversial. Whether surgical reduction for chest wall disease could influence survival outcome is still a question. The objective of this study was to compare overall survival (OS) in patients with recurrence involving the chest wall who did or did not undergo surgical reduction after previous treatment of the primary BC to explore the role of surgical reduction. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed BC patients with chest wall as the first recurrent/metastatic site selected between January 2012 and December 2018 to explore whether surgical reduction for chest wall disease could influence OS. Clinicopathological data, including age at initial diagnosis, TNM stage, the pathological parameters, and treatment were recorded and analyzed. OS was primarily described using the Kaplan-Meier estimator for each group, with the statistical significance between groups being tested by the log-rank test. Results: A total of 198 patients with a median age of 48 years (range, 22-73 years) were analyzed. Chest wall as the only site of recurrence occurred in 139 patients (70.2%), and the other 59 (29.8%) patients had other metastatic sites. There were 88 patients who underwent surgical reduction for chest wall recurrence. The median OS was significantly longer for the patients who had chest wall disease reduction than for those who did not {194.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 140.4-247.9 months] vs. 102.7 months (95% CI: 79.7-125.7 months), respectively, P=0.001}. From multivariate analysis, surgical reduction was an independent factor significantly influenced OS (HR =0.52, 95% CI: 0.33-0.81, P=0.004). Subgroup analyses showed that OS was statistically longer in the chest wall disease surgical reduction group than in the no reduction group with respect to hormone receptor (HR) negative (-), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative (-), triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), disease-free survival (DFS) >24 months, and chest wall disease only. Conclusions: BC patients with chest wall recurrence could benefit from surgical reduction with a prolonged OS. In a certain selected group, surgical reduction may be warranted.
ABSTRACT
Several insights from the clinical treatment of breast cancer patients have revealed that only a portion of patients achieve the expected curative effect after traditional targeted therapy, that surgical treatment may promote the development of cancer metastasis, and that the optimal combination of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and traditional treatment is not clear. Therefore, a more precise classification of breast cancer and selection of treatment methods should be undertaken to improve the efficacy of clinical treatment. In the clinical treatment of breast cancer, cell communication molecules are often selected as therapeutic targets. However, various cell communications are not static. Their dynamic changes are related to communicating cells, communicating molecules, and various intertwined internal and external environmental factors. Understanding the dynamic microenvironment can help us improve therapeutic efficacy and provide new ways to more accurately determine the cancer status. Therefore, this review describes multiple types of cellular communication in the breast cancer microenvironment and incorporates internal and external environmental factors as variable signaling factors in cell communication. Using dynamic and developmental concepts, we summarize the functional changes in signaling molecules and cells to aid in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer.
ABSTRACT
As heterogeneous immune cells, macrophages mount effective responses to various internal and external changes during disease progression. Macrophage polarization, rather than macrophage heterogenization, is often used to describe the functional differences between macrophages. While macrophage polarization partially contributes to heterogeneity, it does not completely explain the concept of macrophage heterogeneity. At the same time, there are abundant and sophisticated endogenous and exogenous substances that can affect macrophage heterogeneity. While the research on endogenous factors has been systematically reviewed, the findings on exogenous factors have not been well summarized. Hence, we reviewed the characteristics and inducing factors of heterogeneous macrophages to reveal their functional plasticity as well as their targeting manoeuvreability. In the process of constructing and analysing a network organized by disease-related cells and molecules, paying more attention to heterogeneous macrophages as mediators of this network may help to explore a novel entry point for early prevention of and intervention in disease.
