The role of myocardial work in evaluating coronary microcirculation of STEMI patients after percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Despite of restoring epicardial infarct-related artery(IRA) patency after myocardial infarction, microvascular reperfusion were not achieved sometimes, and the deterioration of myocardial perfusion persists in a considerable number of patients. This phenomenon is known as microvascular obstruction (MVO). MVO is often observed in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction(STEMI) patients, even if percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was successful. In addition, some evidence has indicated that the presence of MVO predicted poor clinical outcomes independent of myocardial infarct size. Noninvasive as well as invasive modes for assessing microvascular perfusion(MVP) are complex, time consuming, and expensive have, there is yet no simple method available at present to assess coronary microcirculation. In this research, we attempt to evaluate the usefulness of left ventricular myocardial work (LVMW), a new index of myocardial performance, for the assessment of MVP in STEMI patients after PCI. METHODS: Forty-seven patients with STEMI treated by PCI were enrolled and underwent a transthoracic doppler echocardiography (TTE) within 24-72 hours after PCI. IRA were left anterior descending (LAD) artery (29,62%), left circumflex (LCX) artery(9,19%), right coronary artery (RCA) (9,19%) respectively. Myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) was used to evaluate MVP after PCI, then perfusion score index (PSI) was calculated referring to whether the ultrasonic enhancing agents was replenishment or not. Patients were divided into normal MVP and impaired MVP group according to PSI. Left ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS) was generated by speckle tracking echocardiography(STE) and pressure-strain loops (PSLs) was used to generate global work index (GWI), global constructive work (GCW), global wasted work (GWW), and global work efficiency (GWE). GLS and the MW parameters (GWI, GCW, GWW, GWE) were compared between groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated by plotting sensitivity versus (1-specificity), allowing calculation of the area under the curve (AUC) and the identification of LVMW parameters and GLS cutoff thresholds that best identify STEMI patients with impaired MVP after PCI. RESULTS: In this study, a statistically significant difference was observed in GWI (1163±405 mm Hg% vs 1617±363 mm Hg%), GCW (1296±430 mm Hg% vs 1789±406 mm Hg%), GWE (83±8.52% vs 90±5.58%) and GLS (11.56±3.29 vs 16.65±3.59) between impaired MVP group and normal MVP group. However, there is no statistical significance difference in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and GWW. ROC analysis revealed that GCW (cut-off value: 1326 mm Hg%, AUC: .80, sensitivity: 95% and specificity: 56%), GWI (cut-off value: 1281 mm Hg%, AUC: .81, sensitivity: 90% and specificity: 70%), GWE (cut-off value: 90%, AUC: .77, sensitivity: 65% and specificity: 78%) and GLS (cut-off value: 12.5, AUC: .86, sensitivity: 90% and specificity: 67%) have appreciable AUC, sensitivity, and specificity to identify STEMI patients with impaired MVP after PCI. CONCLUSION: Measuring LVMW indices of STEMI patients after PCI may add adjuvant value for the assessment of MVP.

Clinical features and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic surgery in patients co-existing with ovarian endometrioma and deep infiltrating endometriosis / 中华妇产科杂志

Objective:To investigate the clinical features and long-term prognosis of patients co-existing with ovarian endometrioma (OMA) and deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE).Methods:Totally 358 OMA patients were retrospectively analyzed, who had a minimum of 8 years follow-up after laparoscopic cystectomy, which was performed by one professional endometriosis surgery team at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 2009 to April 2013. All women were divided into DIE group and non-DIE group, and analysis was performed in preoperative characteristics, surgical findings and postoperative outcomes during follow-up.Results:A total of 358 OMA patients were included, of which 190 patients (53.1%, 190/358) were in the DIE group, while other 168 patients (46.9%, 168/358) in the non-DIE group. The average ages between the two groups were (33.7±5.4), (32.5±5.3) years ( P=0.047), the average parity was (0.4±0.6) times vs (0.3±0.5) times ( P=0.079). There were significant differences in the proportions of moderate to severe dysmenorrhea [67.4% (128/190) vs 56.5% (95/168)], chronic pelvic pain [24.2% (46/190) vs 7.7% (13/168)], and the increase in CA 125 [79.9% (139/190) vs 65.2% (101/168)] between the two groups (all P<0.05). The average operation time in the DIE and non-DIE groups was (75±21) vs (39±36) minutes ( P<0.01). There was a significant difference in adenomyosis presence between the two groups [41.6% (79/190) vs 22.0% (37/168); P=0.001]. All patients were followed up for at least 8 years. At the end of the follow-up, though the DIE group was with higher total rate of disease relapse, yet no significant difference was found between the two groups in statistical comparison [21.6% (41/190) vs 16.1% (27/168); P=0.185]. A total of 41 cases in the DIE group recurred, the recurrence rate of pain was 15.8% (30/190), and the recurrence rate of cyst was 8.4% (16/190); 27 cases had recurrence after operation in the non-DIE group, the recurrence rate of pain was 8.9% (15/168), and the recurrence rate of cyst was 10.7% (18/168). There were no significant differences in the pain recurrence rate ( P=0.067) and cyst recurrence rate ( P=0.460) between the two groups. As for the successfully pregnant patients, live birth rates were 100.0% (65/65) vs 94.4% (68/72) between DIE group and non-DIE groups ( P=0.120). Conclusions:Compared with the non-DIE group, OMA patients with concurrent DIE might have severe pain symptoms, higher probability of abnormal CA 125 levels and more severe pelvic adhesions. Although there are no significant differences in the total recurrence rate and the recurrence rate of various types between the two groups, the proportion of pain recurrence in the DIE group is higher than that in the non-DIE group. In terms of fertility outcomes, patients in the DIE group are with lower likelihood of pregnancy after surgery during the long-time follow-up. DIE has no significant influence on the fertility outcome.