Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Med Res ; 28(1): 309, 2023 Aug 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37653551

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of VMAT library-derived model transfer in the prediction of IMRT plans by dosimetry comparison among with three groups of IMRT plans: two groups of automatic IMRT plans generated by the knowledge-based the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) model and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) model and one group of manual IMRT plans. METHODS: 52 prostate cancer patients who had completed radiotherapy were selected and randomly divided into 2 groups with 40 and 12 separately. Then both VMAT and IMRT plans were manually designed for all patients. The total plans in the group with 40 cases as training datasets were added to the knowledge-based planning (KBP) models for learning and finally obtained VMAT and IMRT training models. Another 12 cases were selected as the validation group to be used to generated auto IMRT plans by KBP VMAT and IMRT models. At last, the radiotherapy plans from three groups were obtained: the automated IMRT plan (V-IMRT) predicted by the VMAT model, the automated IMRT plan (I-IMRT) predicted by the IMRT model and the manual IMRT plan (M-IMRT) designed before. The dosimetric parameters of planning target volume (PTV) and organ at risks (OARs) as well as the time parameters (monitor unit, MU) were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The dose limit of all plans in the training datasets met the clinical requirements. Compared with the training plans added to VMAT model, the dosimetry parameters have no statistical differences in PTV (P > 0.05); the dose of X% volume (Dx%) with D25% and D35% in rectal and the maximum dose (Dmax) in the right femoral head were lower (P = 0.04, P = 0.01, P = 0.00) while D50% in rectal was higher (< 0.05) in the IMRT model plans. In the 12 validation cases, both automated plans showed better dose distribution compared with the M-IMRT plan: the Dmax of PTV in the I-IMRT plans and the dose in volume of interesting (VOI) of bladder and bilateral femoral heads were lower with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). Compared with the I-IMRT plans, dosimetric parameters in PTV and VOI of all OARs had no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05), but the Dmax in left femoral heard and D15% in the right femoral head were lower and have significant differences (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the low-dose regions, which was defined as all volumes outside of the PTV (RV) with the statistical parameters of mean dose (Dmean), the volume of covering more than 5 Gy dose (V5Gy), and also the time parameter (MU) required to perform the plan were considered. The results showed that Dmean in V-IMRT was smaller than that in the I-IMRT plan (P = 0.02) and there was no significant difference in V5Gy and MU (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared with the manual plan, the IMRT plans generated by the KBP models had a significant advantage in dose control of both OARs and PTV. Compared to the I-IMRT plans, the V-IMRT plans was not only without significant disadvantages, but it also achieved slightly better control of the low-dose region, which meet the clinical requirements and can used in the clinical treatment. This study demonstrates that it is feasible to transfer the KBP VMAT model in the prediction of IMRT plans.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated , Male , Humans , Femur , Knowledge , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy
2.
Appl Radiat Isot ; 186: 110293, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35660984

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Two-dimensional dosimeters are convenient tools for quickly checking the radiation profile in radiotherapy. The currently used solution is costly, especially in busy institutions with extensive quality control procedures. This study fabricates a reusable 2-mm-thick PMMA-NaCl polymer composite sheet and assesses its dosimetric properties. METHODS: The PMMA-NaCl composite sheets were prepared using hot melting procedures. For dosimetric evaluations, the samples were irradiated using 6 MV X-ray photons from a medical linac. The absorbed doses were measured as changes in the optical absorption spectrum using a UV-Vis spectrometer. RESULTS: The lowest dose detected by the samples was 5 Gy, with a linear dose response of at least 20 Gy. The repeatability of the measurements was good, with a standard deviation of 5.03%. The signal was bleachable by using a 100 W filament-type lamp for dosimetric reuse. CONCLUSION: The 2-mm-thick PMMA-NaCl polymer-composite sheet could measure absorbed radiation doses from 6 MV X-ray photons down to 5 Gy. Because the sample is reusable, it can be used in a cost-effective two-dimensional radiation dosimeter to ensure the quality of medical linacs.


Subject(s)
Polymethyl Methacrylate , Sodium Chloride , Particle Accelerators , Polymers , Radiometry/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...