ABSTRACT
AIM: To enhance ultrasound teaching delivery to radiology trainees using a simulation course matched to the 2021 Royal College of Radiologists (RCR) curriculum. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An ultrasound simulation training course was designed for specialty trainees (ST) 1 in radiology, which was based on the 2021 RCR curriculum and covered the top ultrasound training priorities. The course was piloted initially on two occasions in a 1-day format to the August 2021 and the March 2022 ST1 intake trainees. Based on the feedback, a comprehensive 4-day course was developed and delivered between October and December 2022 for the August 2022 ST1 intake, funded by Health Education England. The outcomes measured were subjective trainee feedback using numerical scores and free text. RESULTS: All King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust radiology ST1 trainees from the August 2021 to the August 2022 intake participated in ultrasound simulation training. The training matched the RCR curriculum and increased the trainees' confidence and competency in medical ultrasound. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound simulation training can be successfully delivered to ST1 trainees to match the 2021 RCR curriculum and enhance training in medical ultrasound for radiologists.
Subject(s)
Radiology , Simulation Training , Humans , London , Radiology/education , Curriculum , Radiologists , Clinical CompetenceABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Renal patients with a tunnelled haemodialysis line are at risk of fibrin 'sheath' formation which can lead to occlusion. Dysfunctional lines are best treated by catheter exchange with a new subcutaneous tunnel; however, there is a risk of scarring, venous stenosis, potential loss of valuable access as well as the risk of infection. METHOD: We report a retrospective review of our experience using tunnelled line intraluminal plasty (TuLIP) in 11 patients over 16 months with fibrin sheath formation on pre-existing tunnelled haemodialysis catheters. RESULT: All patients responded well to treatment with median line patency post TuLIP reaching 112 days. CONCLUSION: TuLIP may have a role in extending catheter lifespan and delaying more invasive intervention.
Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon/methods , Catheters, Indwelling/adverse effects , Fibrin/adverse effects , Renal Dialysis/adverse effects , Renal Dialysis/instrumentation , Salvage Therapy/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Angioplasty, Balloon/instrumentation , Equipment Design , Feasibility Studies , Female , Fibrin/metabolism , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
AIM: To establish the feasibility and accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) nephrostogram in comparison to the reference standard, fluoroscopic nephrostogram, in providing alternative imaging of the urinary tract post-nephrostomy insertion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was approved by the institutional and national ethics committee. All patients for whom a fluoroscopic nephrostogram was requested were included. Fluoroscopic and CEUS nephrostograms were performed within 24 hours. Image analysis (nephrostomy position, opacification of pelvicalyceal system, ureter, and bladder) was performed by two reviewers, and the diagnostic accuracy of the CEUS nephrostograms was compared to fluoroscopic nephrostograms. RESULTS: Sixty-two nephrostograms were performed in 48 patients from June 2011 to April 2016, (male: 25/48, 52.1%; mean age 65 years, range 28-90 years). Indications for nephrostomy were: malignancy (29/62; 46.8%), benign ureteric stricture (14/62; 22.6%), urinary diversion (8/62; 12.9%), renal calculus (5/62; 8.1%), haematoma (3/62; 4.8%) or pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction (3/62; 4.8%). Two nephrostomies were identified as displaced by both techniques. The pelvicalyceal system was visualised in 60/60 (100%) examinations in both fluoroscopic and CEUS nephrostograms. The entire ureter was visualised in 30/60 (50%) with CEUS compared to 32/60 (53.3%) fluoroscopically. The distal ureter was the least well-visualised segment for both techniques with no significant difference (p=0.815). Both CEUS and fluoroscopy could be used to correctly identify complications including entero-ureteric fistula or urine leak. Fluoroscopic nephrostogram demonstrated drainage into the bladder in 33/60 (55%), CEUS confirmed drainage in 34/60 (56.7%) cases (p=0.317). CONCLUSIONS: CEUS nephrostogram can determine the correct positioning of a nephrostomy and assess drainage into the bladder with statistically comparable results to fluoroscopy.
Subject(s)
Contrast Media , Image Enhancement/methods , Ultrasonography/methods , Urologic Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Feasibility Studies , Female , Fluoroscopy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Urinary Tract/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a technique that has developed as an adjunct to conventional ultrasound. CEUS offers a number of benefits over conventional axial imaging with computerised tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, primarily as a "beside" test, without ionising radiation or the safety concerns associated with iodinated/gadolinium-based contrast agents. Intravascular use of ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) is widespread with extensive evidence for effective use. Despite this, the potential utility of UCAs in physiological and non-physiological cavities has not been fully explored. The possibilities for endocavitary uses of CEUS are described in this review based on a single-centre experience including CEUS technique and utility in confirming drain placement, as well as within the biliary system, urinary system, gastrointestinal tract and intravascular catheters. TEACHING POINTS: ⢠CEUS offers an excellent safety profile, spatial resolution and is radiation free. ⢠Endocavitary CEUS provides real-time imaging similar to fluoroscopy in a portable setting. ⢠Endocavitary CEUS can define internal architecture of physiological cavities. ⢠Endocavitary CEUS can confirm drain position in physiological and non-physiological cavities.
Subject(s)
Discitis/microbiology , Foreign-Body Migration/etiology , Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Prosthesis-Related Infections/microbiology , Psoas Abscess/microbiology , Pulmonary Embolism/therapy , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Vena Cava Filters/adverse effects , Vena Cava, Inferior , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Discitis/diagnostic imaging , Discitis/therapy , Drainage/methods , Female , Foreign-Body Migration/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Prosthesis Design , Prosthesis Failure , Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Prosthesis-Related Infections/diagnostic imaging , Prosthesis-Related Infections/therapy , Psoas Abscess/diagnostic imaging , Psoas Abscess/therapy , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnostic imaging , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnostic imaging , Staphylococcal Infections/therapy , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome , Vena Cava, Inferior/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
Scrotal emergencies represent a small proportion of admissions to the emergency department; however, the intimate nature and potential for serious outcome often cause great anxiety. Rapid assessment is required to exclude fertility-threatening conditions and expedite surgical management. Ultrasound is an essential tool in acute scrotal assessment as it allows rapid, radiation-free, high-resolution imaging and, importantly, assessment of vascularity with colour Doppler imaging. In the presentation of the acute scrotum, the "on-call" practitioner will frequently be asked to exclude pathology requiring surgical management, in particular torsion of the spermatic cord. To provide an accurate evaluation the individual is required to have an understanding of scrotal anatomy, sonographic technique and recognition of pathology. This review article will familiarise the reader with the sonographic findings of common acute scrotal pathology.