Comparison of the influence of different rehabilitation programmes on clinical, spirometric and spiroergometric parameters in patients with multiple sclerosis.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of four different programmes on spiroergometric, spirometric and clinical parameters in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. METHODS: One hundred and twelve MS patients were divided into four groups. The first group underwent neurophysiologically based physiotherapy, the second aerobic training, the third combined therapy (neurophysiologically based physiotherapy and aerobic training) and the fourth did not change any habits. Seventeen patients did not finish the study. Patients were examined on impairment (Expanded Disability Status Scale), disability (Barthel Index), handicap (Environment Status Scale), quality of life (Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life), fatigue (Modified Fatigue Impact Scale), depression (Beck Depression Inventory Score), respiratory function (spirometric parameters on spirometry) and physical fitness (spiroergometric parameters on a bicycle ergometer). RESULTS: The patients who participated in one of our training programmes showed a significant improvement of the examined parameters in comparison to those who did not change their present habits. Each of the four training programmes had a different impact on the parameters, which means that each of them had a different effect. The neurophysiologically based physiotherapy had the greatest impact on impairment, and the aerobic training on spirometric and spiroergometric parameters. All methods (the neurophysiologically based physiotherapy, the aerobic training and the combined programme) had an impact on fatigue.

Spiroergometric and spirometric parameters in patients with multiple sclerosis: are there any links between these parameters and fatigue, depression, neurological impairment, disability, handicap and quality of life in multiple sclerosis?

One-hundred and twelve patients with multiple sclerosis were selected as population-based sample and examined on impairment (Expanded Disability Status Scale), disability (Barthel Index), handicap (Environment Status Scale), the quality of life (Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life), fatigue (Modified Fatigue Impact Scale), depression (Beck Depression Inventory Score), respiratory function (spirometric parameters on spirometry) and physical fitness (spiroergometric parameters on a bicycle ergometer). The aim of the study was to examine and analyse (descriptive statistics) spiroergometric and spirometric parameters in patients with multiple sclerosis. Firstly, we tested the hypothesis whether spiroergometric and spirometric parameters are decreased and whether there are any correlations between these parameters and measures of impairment, depression, disability, handicap and quality of life. Secondly, we tested the hypothesis whether there is any correlation between a possible deconditioning and fatigue, and between a possible respiratory dysfunction and fatigue in multiple sclerosis. It results from this study that many spiroergometric parameters in patients with multiple sclerosis are significantly lowered in comparison to the population norm. A link can be found between some spiroergometric parameters and neurological impairment, disability, handicap and quality of life. It is not possible to prove any correlation between spiroergometric parameters and depression. From the spirometric parameters, these are expiratory flows that are significantly lowered in MS patients. It is not possible to prove any correlation between spirometric parameters and fatigue, depression, neurological impairment, duration of the disease, disability, handicap and quality of life in multiple sclerosis.

Is it possible to actively and purposely make use of plasticity and adaptability in the neurorehabilitation treatment of multiple sclerosis patients? A pilot project.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether neurorehabilitation is able to influence clinical parameters and brain function measured radiologically. DESIGN: A group of healthy probands was compared with two groups of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, one of which received rehabilitative therapy. SETTING: Outpatient in a university hospital. SUBJECTS: Twenty-eight patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), 17 of whom received rehabilitative therapy, and 13 healthy controls. INTERVENTIONS: Two months of rehabilitative eclectic therapy based on principles of sensorimotor learning and adaptation. MAIN MEASURES: Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite, Modified Fatigue Impact Scale, Beck Depression Inventory Score, Barthel Index, Environment Status Scale and Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life--54, and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). RESULTS: Patients who underwent neurorehabilitation showed a greater drop in fatigue, depression, impairment, disability and handicap and more improvement in quality of life than those who did not receive therapy. Correlation of brain activity between the right and the left hemisphere is greater in healthy individuals than in MS patients. Neurorehabilitation resulted in a trend for increased correlation between the left and the right hemisphere in patients (approaching the standard). In comparison with control groups, signal amplitudes in anatomical areas did not show any significant changes. CONCLUSION: Clinical changes seen with neurorehabilitation were not associated with any detectable changes in fMRI observations.