Topography of the oblique vein of the left atrium (vein of Marshall).

BACKGROUND: The oblique vein of the left atrium is of interest for electrophysiologists working in the field of both basic science and clinical practice. AIMS: We aimed to examine the topographic anatomy of the oblique vein and to assess the vein's location and relationships with surrounding cardiac structures. METHODS: A total of 200 autopsied adult human hearts were examined. RESULTS: The oblique vein was observed in 71% of the hearts. Its mean (SD) total length was 30.8 (13.6) mm. In hearts with the oblique vein, a larger distance was observed between the left inferior pulmonary vein (LIPV) and great cardiac vein (mean [SD], 18.6 [5.1] mm vs 16.3 [4.8] mm; P = 0.004), between the left atrial appendage (LAA) and LIPV (mean [SD], 17.8 [6.8] mm vs 15.1 [5.2] mm; P = 0.007), and between the LAA and left superior pulmonary vein (LSPV; mean [SD], 28.5 [7.2] mm vs 21.3 [6.4] mm; P <0.001). Hearts with a classic pattern of left­sided pulmonary veins were categorized into 4 types based on the length of oblique vein extension. In type I, the vein extended below the level of the LIPV (21.9%); in type II, to the level of the LIPV (47.7%); in type III, to the level of the interpulmonary area (17.2%); and in type IV, to the level of the LSPV (13.3%). In each type, the distance between the oblique vein and LIPV was shorter than that between the oblique vein and LAA Conclusions: The oblique vein had a variable course and differing lengths of extension. The presence of the oblique vein was connected with a greater distance between the left­sided pulmonary veins and LAA.

Morphology of the Vieussens valve and its imaging in cardiac multislice computed tomography.

INTRODUCTION: To deliver accurate morphological descriptions of the Vieussens valve (VV) and to investigate whether this structure could be visualized using standard contrast-enhanced electrocardiogram-gated multislice computed tomography (MSCT). METHODS: A total of 145 human autopsied hearts and 114 cardiac MSCT scans were examined. RESULTS: The VV was observed in both study groups, however, the detection rate was significantly worse in the MSCT examination (18.4% in MSCT vs 62.1% in cadavers, P < .0001). The VV height was larger in MSCT patients (2.8 ± 1.2 vs 5.4 ± 1.7 mm; P < .0001). No significant difference was found in the measured distance between the VV and the coronary sinus ostium between the two separate subgroups (27.3 ± 9.5 vs 24.4 ± 5.8 mm; P = .18). In autopsied material the most frequent valve location was the anterior wall of the coronary sinus (43.3%); the same was observed in MSCT scans (71.4%). CONCLUSION: The VV is a common heart structure, present in over 60% of humans, located mainly on the anterior and superior circuit of the coronary sinus, with relatively high morphological variability. Large VVs, which pose a significant obstacle in catheterization procedures, may be visualized using standard-protocol contrast-enhanced cardiac MSCT.

Variations and angulation of the coronary sinus tributaries: Implications for left ventricular pacing.

BACKGROUND: Variations of the coronary sinus tributaries might result in difficulties in left ventricle electrode insertion during cardiac resynchronizing therapy. Morphometric features of tributaries, especially angulation of the coronary sinus tributaries, are crucial for coronary sinus procedures. METHODS: This study was carried out on 200 formaldehyde-fixed human hearts (22.0% females, mean age of 48.7 ± 15.6 years). RESULTS: The inferolateral aspect of the left ventricle was accessible from the coronary venous tree in 77.0% (in 35% from one, 29% from two, and 13.0% from three tributaries). The middle cardiac vein was present in all cases, with a diameter of 1.8 ± 0.5 mm, cannulation distance of 5.3 ± 3.2 mm, and angle of 82.0 ± 12.8°. The inferolateral vein of the left ventricle varied greatly in number: single in 63.5%, multiple in 30.5%. The ostium diameter for a single vein was 1.3 ± 0.5 mm, cannulation distance was 21.1 ± 9.8 mm, and the angle was 98.1 ± 13.5°. The left marginal vein was present in 39.5% with an ostium diameter of 0.9 ± 0.5 mm, cannulation distance of 46.0 ± 12.0 mm, and angle of 92.0 ± 13.4°. Finally, the oblique vein of the left atrium was present in 71.0% with a diameter of 1.3 ± 0.8 mm, cannulation distance of 27.2 ± 9.4 mm, and angle of 136.8 ± 16.6°. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the clinically relevant morphometric characteristic of coronary sinus tributaries. The middle cardiac vein is the most constant among coronary veins. However, it is usually not suitable for left ventricular pacing. The inferolateral vein of the left ventricle is highly variable in number, but its morphology makes it a suitable target for left ventricular lead placement.

Intima-media thickness and ankle-brachial index are correlated with the extent of coronary artery disease measured by the SYNTAX score.

INTRODUCTION: The extent of peripheral artery disease (PAD) measured by the ankle-brachial index (ABI) and intima-media thickness (IMT) is correlated with the complexity of coronary artery disease (CAD) in stable angina patients. However, data regarding patients with acute coronary syndromes are still lacking. AIM: To compare coronary complexity measured by the SYNTAX score in patients with and without PAD presenting with myocardial infarction (MI). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Both ABI and IMT were measured in 101 consecutive patients who underwent primary diagnostic due to MI. Patients were divided into three tertile groups depending on the SYNTAX score (0-4; 5-11; 12 and more points). RESULTS: Mean ABI in the general population was 0.9 ±0.26, mean IMT was 0.8 ±0.3 mm and mean SYNTAX score was 7.8 ±5.4 points. We found significant correlations between ABI and SYNTAX score (p = 0.01), IMT and SYNTAX score (p < 0.001), and IMT and ABI (p < 0.001). The highest mean values of IMT (p < 0.001) and lowest mean values of ABI (p = 0.015) were found in patients in the highest SYNTAX score group. When analyzing receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves, IMT had greater specificity and sensitivity than ABI. CONCLUSIONS: Both IMT and ABI are correlated with SYNTAX score (positively for IMT and negatively for ABI values). In our study, IMT was a better predictor of SYNTAX score than ABI. Our study suggests that the higher rate of cardiovascular events in patients with PAD presenting with MI may be partially explained by greater coronary lesion complexity.

No clinical benefit from manual thrombus aspiration in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

INTRODUCTION: There are scarce data on the usefulness of manual thrombectomy among patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Early positive reports were not supported by the clinical outcome in the recent TATORT-NSTEMI (Thrombus Aspiration in Thrombus Containing Culprit Lesions in Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) study. AIM: To analyze the long-term outcome of NSTEMI patients treated with manual thrombectomy during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the Polish multicenter National Registry of Drug Eluting Stents (NRDES) study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: There were 13 catheterization laboratories in Poland that enrolled patients in NRDES Registry in 2010-2011. Patients with a diagnosis of NSTEMI were divided into two groups: those that were treated with manual thrombectomy for their primary PCI (T) and those who were not (NT). RESULTS: There were 923 patients diagnosed with NSTEMI in NRDES. Aspiration thrombectomy was used in 71 (7.7%) patients and the remaining 852 (92.3%) NSTEMI cases were treated without thrombectomy during the index PCI. Thrombectomy was more often used in patients with TIMI less than 1, thrombus grades 4 and 5 and older male patients. Percutaneous coronary interventions complications such as distal embolization and slow flow were more often observed in the thrombectomy subgroup. Overall mortality at 1 year was 1.69% in the T and 5.92% in the NT group (p = 0.24 and p = 0.32 after propensity score matching adjustment with p = 0.11 in the multivariate logistic regression model). CONCLUSIONS: There was no mortality benefit from thrombus aspiration in NSTEMI patients at 1-year follow-up.

The impact of multiple stent implantation in the infarct-related artery on one-year clinical outcomes of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Data from the Polish NRDES Registry.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: We sought to evaluate the impact of multiple stent implantation in the infarct-related artery (IRA) on one-year clinical outcomes of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Data on 1741 consecutive patients with STEMI, who underwent immediate PCI with implantation of ≥ 1 stent, enrolled the National Registry of Drug Eluting Stents (NRDES) were assessed. Patients were stratified based on the number of implanted stents in IRA: 1 vs. ≥ 2 stents. At the discretion of operators, ≥ 2 stents in IRA were implanted in 247 (14.2%) patients. The remaining 1494 patients were treated with a single stent. Patients treated with multiple stents were less likely to achieve Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade 3 flow after primary PCI. Overall mortality at one year was 8.3% in the single stent group and 10.3% in the ≥ 2 stents group (p = 0.37; adjusted for propensity score p = 0.13). After propensity score matching, patients treated with ≥ 2 stents were at higher risk of definite or probable stent thrombosis and urgent revascularisation at one year. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI, a need for implantation of ≥ 2 stents in IRA carries an increased risk of stent thrombosis and urgent revascularisation at one year.

Assessment of quality of life in patients after surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

OBJECTIVES: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (mini-thoracotomy, mini-sternotomy, MIAVR) have become an appealing alternative to conventional surgical (SAVR) treatment of severe aortic stenosis (AS) in high-risk patients. BACKGROUND: Aim of the study was to evaluate the quality of life (QoL) in patients with AS and treated with transfemoral TAVI, SAVR, mini-thoracotomy and mini-sternotomy. METHODS: One hundred and seventy-three patients with symptomatic AS were enrolled in 2011-2013. TAVI group consisted of 39 patients (22.5%), mini-sternotomy was performed in 44 patients (25.5%), mini-thoracotomy in 50 (29%), and AVR in 40 patients (23%). QoL was assessed perioperatively, 12 and 24 months after aortic valve replacement (AVR) by Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) and EQ-5D-3L. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 583.5 (IQR: 298-736) days. Improvement of health status after procedure in comparison with pre-operative period was significantly more often reported after TAVI in perioperative period (90.3%; P = 0.004) and 12 months after procedure (100%, P = 0.02). Global MLHFQ, physical and emotional dimension score at 30-day from AVR presented significant improvement after TAVI in comparison with surgical methods (respectively: 8.3(±8.6), P = 0.003; 4.1(±5.9), P = 0.01; 1.5(±2.6), P = 0.005). Total MLHFQ score was significantly lower (better outcome) in TAVI patients 1 year after procedure (4.8(±6.8), P = 0.004), no differences in somatic and emotional component were found. No differences were found in MLHFQ score 24 months after AVR. Data from EQ-D5-3L questionnaire demonstrated significant improvement of QoL at 30-day follow-up after TAVI in comparison with surgical methods (1.2(±1.7), P = 0.0008). CONCLUSIONS: TAVI improves QoL in perioperative and 12 months observation in comparison with mini-thoracotomy, mini-sternotomy and SAVR. Improvement in QoL was obtained in both generic and disease specific questionnaires. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Comparison of patient comfort after coronary angiography by standard arterial access approaches.

BACKGROUND: Radial access during coronary angiography has become an increasingly popular alternative to femoral access. The procedural outcomes and complications of these two approaches have been thoroughly evaluated; however, no studies have focused exclusively on the postprocedural quality of life of patients. AIM: To determine and compare both methods from the patient's point of view. METHODS: Data were gathered from 165 consecutive patients scheduled for elective coronary angiography (from October 2011 to June 2012). The choice of the access site was left at operator's discretion. Femoral and radial groups consisted of 91 and 74 patients, respectively. Quality of life was assessed by the Short Form of the McGill Questionnaire and a self-designed questionnaire (Questionnaire II) consisting of eight questions evaluating the procedure-specific aspects of recovery time. After three months from index hospitalisation post-discharge interviews were conducted using a modified version of Questionnaire II with an additional two questions. RESULTS: Patients from the transfemoral approach group characterised their pain (according to McGill Questionnaire) more often as aching (mean value ± SD: 0.84 ± 1.2 vs. 0.21 ± 0.6; p = 0.003), heavy (0.29 vs. 0.027; p = 0.02), and exhausting (0.22 ± 0.7 vs. 0.07 ± 0.2; p = 0.037). Moreover, in Questionnaire II they indicated tenderness of the puncture site (0.42 ± 0.8 vs. 0.23 ± 0.07; p = 0.00004) more frequently. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of life of patients who underwent coronary angiography from radial access was remarkably better in terms of pain characteristic and overall discomfort.

Comparison of radiation dose exposure in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention vs. peripheral intervention.

INTRODUCTION: Most endovascular techniques are associated with patient and personal exposure to radiation during the procedure. Ionising radiation can cause deterministic effects, such as skin injury, as well as stochastic effects, which increase the long-term risk of malignancy. Endovascular operators need to be aware of radiation danger and take all necessary steps to minimise the risk to patients and staff. Some procedures, especially percutaneous peripheral artery revascularisation, are associated with increased radiation dose due to time-consuming operations. There is limited data comparing radiation dose during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of peripheral arteries. AIM: To compare the radiation dose in percutaneous coronary vs. peripheral interventions in one centre with a uniform system of protection methods. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 352 patients were included in the study. This included 217 patients undergoing PCI (single and multiple stenting) and 135 patients undergoing PTA (in lower extremities, carotid artery, renal artery, and subclavian artery). Radiation dose, fluoroscopy time, and total procedural time were reviewed. Cumulative radiation dose was measured in gray (Gy) units. RESULTS: The total procedural time was significantly higher in PTA (PCI vs. PTA: 60 (45-85) min vs. 75 (50-100) min), p < 0.001. The radiation dose for PCI procedures was significantly higher in comparison to PTA (PCI vs. PTA: 1.36 (0.83-2.23) Gy vs. 0.27 (0.13-0.46) Gy), p < 0.001. There was no significant difference in the fluoroscopy time (PCI vs. PTA: 12.9 (8.2-21.5) min vs. 14.4 (8.0-22.6) min), p = 0.6. The analysis of correlation between radiation dose and fluoroscopy time in PCI and PTA interventions separately shows a strong correlation in PCI group (r = 0.785). However, a weak correlation was found in PTA group (r = 0.317). CONCLUSIONS: The radiation dose was significantly higher during PCI in comparison to PTA procedures despite comparable fluoroscopy time and longer total procedure time in PTA. Fluoroscopy time is a reliable parameter to control the radiation dose exposure in coronary procedures. The increasing complexity of endovascular interventions has resulted in the increase of radiation dose exposure during PCI procedures.