The qualitative detection of decreases in cardiac output.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac output is a major factor in the maintenance of physiological homeostasis and is difficult to measure with accuracy. This study describes an evidence-based technique, based on physiological changes, which may indicate small changes in cardiac output that cannot be measured by current techniques. METHOD: Synchronous changes in blood pressure, heart rate, pulse amplitude and end-tidal carbon dioxide are analysed using runs analysis and a normalisation technique. An evidence-based algorithm was used to detect possible changes in cardiac output and data extracts from 31 consenting patients are presented as examples. RESULTS: The decrease in end-tidal carbon dioxide, during steady state ventilation, was greater in those events notified as hypovolaemia associated with a fall in cardiac output than those events notified as hypovolaemia alone. The difference in end-tidal carbon dioxide between the two groups was -0.25 kPa (CI -0.42 to -0.09) p<0.003. DISCUSSION: Runs analysis can detect trends in EtCO2 that during steady state ventilation may indicate a decrease in cardiac output. It is a safe technique; no additional hardware is required and the generated alerts only notify the clinician of the possibility of an adverse change. Determination of the rate of clinically significant false positives and negatives requires further work.

Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling to describe the effects of paracetamol and N-acetylcysteine on the international normalized ratio.

Paracetamol is one of the most common pharmaceutical agents taken in self-poisonings, and can increase the prothrombin time (PT) through liver injury, and in overdose without hepatic injury by reducing functional factor VII. PT is a measure of hepatic injury used to predict and monitor hepatotoxicity, reported as the international normalized ratio (INR). The antidote for paracetamol poisoning, N-acetylcysteine (NAC), has been reported to have an effect on the PT. This analysis included patients from a retrospective case series, a prospective inception cohort of paracetamol and psychotropic (control) overdoses, and a cross-over clinical trial. A population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model describing the pharmacodynamic effects of paracetamol and NAC on the INR was developed in Phoenix NLME. The dataset included 172 patients; the median age was 22 years (range 13-71 years). A one-compartment model with first-order input and linear disposition best described paracetamol pharmacokinetics. The population mean estimate of the concentration that induced a response halfway between the baseline and maximal pharmacological effect of paracetamol was 1302 µmol/L (242), the maximum effect of paracetamol was 0.534 (202; from baseline) and the maximum effect of NAC was 0.325 (9.03; from baseline). Both paracetamol and NAC contributed a pharmacological effect to the elevation of INR. The estimated paracetamol concentration that induced a response halfway between the baseline and maximal pharmacological effect was within the range of plasma paracetamol values studied, fivefold greater than the maximum therapeutic concentration, suggesting that an elevated INR would not be expected within the therapeutic range. Simulated 24 and 48 g paracetamol overdoses with NAC administration produced INR values (50th percentile) that reached the upper limit of, or exceeded, the reference range.

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) during the postoperative period for prevention of postoperative morbidity and mortality following major abdominal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Major abdominal surgery can be associated with a number of serious complications that may impair patient recovery. In particular, postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), including respiratory complications such as atelectasis and pneumonia, are a major contributor to postoperative morbidity and may even contribute to increased mortality. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is a type of therapy that uses a high-pressure gas source to deliver constant positive pressure to the airways throughout both inspiration and expiration. This approach is expected to prevent some pulmonary complications, thus reducing mortality. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether any difference can be found in the rate of mortality and adverse events following major abdominal surgery in patients treated postoperatively with CPAP versus standard care, which may include traditional oxygen delivery systems, physiotherapy and incentive spirometry. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) 2013, Issue 9; Ovid MEDLINE (1966 to 15 September 2013); EMBASE (1988 to 15 September 2013); Web of Science (to September 2013) and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) (to September 2013). SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which CPAP was compared with standard care for prevention of postoperative mortality and adverse events following major abdominal surgery. We included all adults (adults as defined by individual studies) of both sexes. The intervention of CPAP was applied during the postoperative period. We excluded studies in which participants had received PEEP during surgery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected studies that met the selection criteria from all studies identified by the search strategy. Two review authors extracted the data and assessed risk of bias separately, using a data extraction form. Data entry into RevMan was performed by one review author and was checked by another for accuracy. We performed a limited meta-analysis and constructed a summary of findings table. MAIN RESULTS: We selected 10 studies for inclusion in the review from 5236 studies identified in the search. These 10 studies included a total of 709 participants. Risk of bias for the included studies was assessed as high in six studies and as unclear in four studies.Two RCTs reported all-cause mortality. Among 413 participants, there was no clear evidence of a difference in mortality between CPAP and control groups, and considerable heterogeneity between trials was noted (risk ratio (RR) 1.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35 to 4.66; I(2) = 75%).Six studies reported demonstrable atelectasis in the study population. A reduction in atelectasis was observed in the CPAP group, although heterogeneity between studies was substantial (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.86; I(2) = 61%). Pneumonia was reported in five studies, including 563 participants; CPAP reduced the rate of pneumonia, and no important heterogeneity was noted (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.84; I(2) = 0%). The number of participants identified as having serious hypoxia was reported in two studies, with no clear difference between CPAP and control groups, given imprecise results and substantial heterogeneity between trials (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.22 to 1.02; I(2) = 67%). A reduced rate of reintubation was reported in the CPAP group compared with the control group in two studies, and no important heterogeneity was identified (RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.58; I(2) = 0%). Admission into the intensive care unit (ICU) for invasive ventilation and supportive care was reduced in the CPAP group, but this finding did not reach statistical significance (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.18 to 1.14; I(2) = 0).Secondary outcomes such as length of hospital stay and adverse effects were only minimally reported.A summary of findings table was constructed using the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) principle. The quality of evidence was determined to be very low. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Very low-quality evidence from this review suggests that CPAP initiated during the postoperative period might reduce postoperative atelectasis, pneumonia and reintubation, but its effects on mortality, hypoxia or invasive ventilation are uncertain. Evidence is not sufficiently strong to confirm the benefits or harms of CPAP during the postoperative period in those undergoing major abdominal surgery. Most of the included studies did not report on adverse effects attributed to CPAP.New, high-quality research is much needed to evaluate the use of CPAP in preventing mortality and morbidity following major abdominal surgery. With increasing availability of CPAP to our surgical patients and its potential to improve outcomes (possibly in conjunction with intraoperative lung protective ventilation strategies), unanswered questions regarding its efficacy and safety need to be addressed. Any future study must report on the adverse effects of CPAP.

Population pharmacokinetics of intravenous acetaminophen and its metabolites in major surgical patients.

Intravenous acetaminophen is a commonly used analgesic following surgery. The aims of this study were to determine the population pharmacokinetic profile of intravenous acetaminophen and its metabolites in adult surgical patients and to identify patient characteristics associated with acetaminophen metabolism in the postoperative period. 53 patients were included in the dataset; 28 were men, median age (range) 60 years (33-87), median weight (range) 74 kg (54-129). Patients received 1, 1.5 or 2 g of intravenous acetaminophen every 4-6 h. Plasma and urine samples were collected at various intervals for up to 6 days after surgery. Simultaneous modelling of parent acetaminophen and its metabolites was conducted in Phoenix(®) NLME™ to estimate pharmacokinetic parameters. The population mean estimate (CV%) for central (plasma) volume of distribution of parent acetaminophen (VC) was 13.9 (4.41) L, peripheral (tissue) volume of distribution (VT) was 50.9 (2.96) L, and intercompartmental clearance (Q) was 77.5 (9.29) L/h. The population mean (CV%) metabolic clearances for glucuronidation (CLPG) was 8.92 (3.25) L/h, sulfation (CLPS) was 0.903 (3.47) L/h, and oxidation (CLPO) was 0.533 (7.90) L/h. The population mean (CV%) urinary clearances of parent acetaminophen (CLRP) was 0.137 (5.46) L/h, acetaminophen glucuronide (CLRG) was 3.81 (6.71) L/h, acetaminophen sulfate (CLRS) was 3.13 (4.32) L/h, and acetaminophen cysteine + mercapturate (CLRO) was 3.51 (9.98) L/h. Age was found to be a significant covariate on the formation of acetaminophen glucuronide, and renal function (estimated as creatinine clearance) on the urinary excretion of acetaminophen glucuronide.

Interventions for protecting renal function in the perioperative period.

BACKGROUND: Various methods have been used to try to protect kidney function in patients undergoing surgery. These most often include pharmacological interventions such as dopamine and its analogues, diuretics, calcium channel blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, N-acetyl cysteine (NAC), atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), sodium bicarbonate, antioxidants and erythropoietin (EPO). OBJECTIVES: This review is aimed at determining the effectiveness of various measures advocated to protect patients' kidneys during the perioperative period.We considered the following questions: (1) Are any specific measures known to protect kidney function during the perioperative period? (2) Of measures used to protect the kidneys during the perioperative period, does any one method appear to be more effective than the others? (3) Of measures used to protect the kidneys during the perioperative period,does any one method appear to be safer than the others? SEARCH METHODS: In this updated review, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2012), MEDLINE (Ovid SP) (1966 to August 2012) and EMBASE (Ovid SP) (1988 to August 2012). We originally handsearched six journals (Anesthesia and Analgesia, Anesthesiology, Annals of Surgery, British Journal of Anaesthesia, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, and Journal of Vascular Surgery) (1985 to 2004). However, because these journals are properly indexed in MEDLINE, we decided to rely on electronic searches only without handsearching the journals from 2004 onwards. SELECTION CRITERIA: We selected all randomized controlled trials in adults undergoing surgery for which a treatment measure was used for the purpose of providing renal protection during the perioperative period. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We selected 72 studies for inclusion in this review. Two review authors extracted data from all selected studies and entered them into RevMan 5.1; then the data were appropriately analysed. We performed subgroup analyses for type of intervention, type of surgical procedure and pre-existing renal dysfunction. We undertook sensitivity analyses for studies with high and moderately good methodological quality. MAIN RESULTS: The updated review included data from 72 studies, comprising a total of 4378 participants. Of these, 2291 received some form of treatment and 2087 acted as controls. The interventions consisted most often of different pharmaceutical agents, such as dopamine and its analogues, diuretics, calcium channel blockers, ACE inhibitors, NAC, ANP, sodium bicarbonate, antioxidants and EPO or selected hydration fluids. Some clinical heterogeneity and varying risk of bias were noted amongst the studies, although we were able to meaningfully interpret the data. Results showed significant heterogeneity and indicated that most interventions provided no benefit.Data on perioperative mortality were reported in 41 studies and data on acute renal injury in 44 studies (all interventions combined). Because of considerable clinical heterogeneity (different clinical scenarios, as well as considerable methodological variability amongst the studies), we did not perform a meta-analysis on the combined data.Subgroup analysis of major interventions and surgical procedures showed no significant influence of interventions on reported mortality and acute renal injury. For the subgroup of participants who had pre-existing renal damage, the risk of mortality from 10 trials (959 participants) was estimated as odds ratio (OR) 0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38 to 1.52; the risk of acute renal injury (as reported in the trials) was estimated from 11 trials (979 participants) as OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.80. Subgroup analysis of studies that were rated as having low risk of bias revealed that 19 studies reported mortality numbers (1604 participants); OR was 1.01, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.90. Fifteen studies reported data on acute renal injury (criteria chosen by the individual studies; 1600 participants); OR was 1.03, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.97. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: No reliable evidence from the available literature suggests that interventions during surgery can protect the kidneys from damage. However, the criteria used to diagnose acute renal damage varied in many of the older studies selected for inclusion in this review, many of which suffered from poor methodological quality such as insufficient participant numbers and poor definitions of end points such as acute renal failure and acute renal injury. Recent methods of detecting renal damage such as the use of specific biomarkers and better defined criteria for identifying renal damage (RIFLE (risk, injury, failure, loss of kidney function and end-stage renal failure) or AKI (acute kidney injury)) may have to be explored further to determine any possible benefit derived from interventions used to protect the kidneys during the perioperative period.

The pharmacokinetic profile of intravenous paracetamol in adult patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous (IV) paracetamol is commonly used in the postoperative period for the treatment of mild to moderate pain. The main pathways for paracetamol metabolism are glucuronidation, sulfation, and oxidation, accounting for approximately 55%, 30%, and 10% of urinary metabolites, respectively. The aim of this study was to describe the pharmacokinetics of IV paracetamol and its metabolites in adult patients after major abdominal surgery. METHODS: Twenty patients were given 1 g of paracetamol by IV infusion at induction of anesthesia (Interval 1) and every 6 hours thereafter, with the final dose given at 48-72 hours (Interval 2). Plasma and urine samples were collected for up to 8 hours after infusion for both intervals. The samples were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography to determine the amount of paracetamol and its metabolites. The data were modeled in Phoenix WinNonlin using a user-defined ASCII parent-metabolite model with linear disposition, to obtain the estimates for volume of distribution, metabolic and urinary clearance. RESULTS: Mean (95% confidence interval) metabolic clearance to paracetamol glucuronide increased from 0.06 (0.05-0.08) to 0.14 (0.11-0.18) L · h⁻¹ · kg⁻¹, P value <0.001 and urinary clearance increased from 0.08 (0.07-0.09) to 0.14 (0.10-0.17) L · h⁻¹ · kg⁻¹, P value 0.002. The mean (95% confidence interval) volume of distribution of paracetamol increased from 0.17 (0.12-0.21) to 0.43 (0.27-0.59) L · kg⁻¹, P value 0.032. CONCLUSIONS: After major abdominal surgery, there were apparent increases in the metabolic conversion to paracetamol glucuronide and its urinary clearance suggesting potential induction of paracetamol glucuronidation.

Simultaneous modelling of the Michaelis-Menten kinetics of paracetamol sulphation and glucuronidation.

1. The aim of the present study was to perform an in vivo estimation of the Michaelis-Menten constants of the major metabolic pathways of paracetamol (APAP). 2. A two-occasion, single-dose cross-over trial was performed using 60 and 90 mg/kg doses of APAP in healthy patients undergoing third molar dental extraction. Plasma samples were collected over 24 h and urine was collected for 8 h after dosing. Twenty patients were enrolled in the study and complete data for plasma and urine were available for both doses for 13 volunteers who were included in the analysis; seven of the volunteers were men, the median age (range) was 22 years (19-31) and the median weight (range) was 68 kg (50-86). 3. The mean (95% CI) k(m) for APAP glucuronidation was 6.89 mmol/L (3.57-10.22) and the V(max) was 0.97 mmol/h per kg (0.65-1.28). The k(m) for APAP sulphation was 0.097 mmol/L (0.041-0.152) and the V(max) was 0.011 mmol/h per kg (0.009-0.013). For the combined excretion of APAP-cysteine and APAP-mercapturate, the k(m) was 0.303 mmol/L (0.131-0.475) and the V(max) was 0.004 mmol/h per kg (0.002-0.005). 4. The estimates for in vivo Michaelis-Menten constants for APAP glucuronidation and sulphation were in the order of those reported previously using in vitro methods.

Interventions for protecting renal function in the perioperative period.

BACKGROUND: A number of methods have been used to try to protect kidney function in patients undergoing surgery. These include the administration of dopamine and its analogues, diuretics, calcium channel blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and hydration fluids. OBJECTIVES: For this review, we selected randomized controlled trials which employed different methods to protect renal function during the perioperative period. In examining these trials, we looked at outcomes that included renal failure and mortality as well as changes in renal function tests, such as urine output, creatinine clearance, free water clearance, fractional excretion of sodium and renal plasma flow. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 2), MEDLINE (1966 to June, 2007), and EMBASE (1988 to June, 2007); and handsearched six journals (Anesthesia and Analgesia, Anesthesiology, Annals of Surgery, British Journal of Anaesthesia, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, and Journal of Vascular Surgery). SELECTION CRITERIA: We selected all randomized controlled trials in adults undergoing surgery where a treatment measure was used for the purpose of renal protection in the perioperative period. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We selected 53 studies for inclusion in this review. As well as data analysis from all the studies, we performed subgroup analysis for type of intervention, type of surgical procedure, and pre-existing renal dysfunction. We undertook sensitivity analysis on studies with high and moderately good methodological quality. MAIN RESULTS: The review included data from 53 studies, comprising a total of 2327 participants. Of these, 1293 received some form of treatment and 1034 acted as controls. The interventions mostly consisted of different pharmaceutical agents, such as dopamine and its analogues, diuretics, calcium channel blockers, ACE inhibitors, or selected hydration fluids. The results indicated that certain interventions showed minimal benefits. All the results suffered from significant heterogeneity. Hence we cannot draw conclusions about the effectiveness of these interventions in protecting patients' kidneys during surgery. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no reliable evidence from the available literature to suggest that interventions during surgery can protect the kidneys from damage. There is a need for more studies with high methodological quality. One particular area for further study may be patients with pre-existing renal dysfunction undergoing surgery.

The effect of leaving dentures in place on bag-mask ventilation at induction of general anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: The optimum timing for denture removal in edentulous patients before anesthesia and surgery is uncertain. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the effect of leaving dentures in during bag-mask ventilation at induction of general anesthesia. One hundred sixty-six edentulous patients were randomized to two groups. The Dentures-In group was bag-mask ventilated after induction of anesthesia with dentures left in place. The Dentures-Out group patients had their dentures removed before bag-mask ventilation. The degree of difficulty of bag-mask ventilation was assessed by the anesthesiologist. RESULTS: Successful bag-mask ventilation, as defined by a increase in ETco(2) to 20 mm Hg and back to baseline with 3 L/min fresh gas flow and the adjustable pressure limiting valve at 20 cm H(2)O, was achieved in 61 of 84 (73%) of the Dentures-In patients compared with 40 of 81 (49%) of the Dentures-Out patients (odds ratio 0.37, 95% CI = 0.19-0.70, P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: We conclude that bag-mask ventilation is easier in edentulate patients when their dentures are left in situ during induction of general anesthesia.

Effectiveness of tramadol as an analgesic in oral surgery.

In a randomised, double-blind, cross-over trial, 15 healthy, young patients undergoing surgical removal of bilateral, impacted, third-molar teeth received the analgesic tramadol 50 mg, as a single dose, either 2 hours prior or immediately before the surgical procedure. There were no differences in the post-operative pain levels or degree of trismus between the two methods of administration of tramadol (P > 0.05), suggesting absence of any pre-emptive analgesic effect for the drug in the dose studied. The prevalence of unwanted side effects such as nausea (37 percent) was high within the first 24 hours.