Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Prenat Diagn ; 38(10): 740-747, 2018 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29956345

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: There are concerns regarding the potential harms in receipt of prenatal chromosome microarray (CMA) results, particularly variants of uncertain significance (VUS). We examined the influence that the return of genomic results had on parental well-being and perceptions of children's development. METHODS: Parents (n = 138) of 83 children who underwent prenatal chromosomal microarray testing completed questionnaires assessing perception of children's development, parent-child attachment, parental mood, parenting competence, martial satisfaction, satisfaction with the decision to undergo testing, and attitudes about genetics at age 12 and/or 36 months. Responses were compared between parents who received normal/likely benign results and VUS results. RESULTS: Compared to normal/likely benign results, parents who received VUS results rated their child as less competent on the BITSEA scale at 12 (ß = -1.65, P = .04) though not 36 months (P = .43). There were no differences in parent mood, marital satisfaction, or parenting competence. At 36 months, parents in the VUS group reported less satisfaction with their decision to undergo genetic testing (ß = 1.51, P = .02). CONCLUSION: Chromosome microarray VUS results have limited impact on parental well-being and perception of children's development. However, the initial diminished perception of child competency and later dissatisfaction with genomic testing indicate the need to assist parents in coping with ambiguous results.


Subject(s)
Child Development , Parents/psychology , Perception , Prenatal Diagnosis/psychology , Child, Preschool , Chromosome Aberrations , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant Behavior , Male , Microarray Analysis , Parent-Child Relations , Parenting/psychology
2.
Obstet Gynecol ; 124(1): 83-90, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24901266

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of other-than-common benign copy number variants with specific fetal abnormalities detected by ultrasonogram. METHODS: Fetuses with structural anomalies were compared with fetuses without detected abnormalities for the frequency of other-than-common benign copy number variants. This is a secondary analysis from the previously published National Institute of Child Health and Human Development microarray trial. Ultrasound reports were reviewed and details of structural anomalies were entered into a nonhierarchical web-based database. The frequency of other-than-common benign copy number variants (ie, either pathogenic or variants of uncertain significance) not detected by karyotype was calculated for each anomaly in isolation and in the presence of other anomalies and compared with the frequency in fetuses without detected abnormalities. RESULTS: Of 1,082 fetuses with anomalies detected on ultrasound scan, 752 had a normal karyotype. Other-than-common benign copy number variants were present in 61 (8.1%) of these euploid fetuses. Fetuses with anomalies in more than one system had a 13.0% frequency of other-than-common benign copy number variants, which was significantly higher (P<.001) than the frequency (3.6%) in fetuses without anomalies (n=1,966). Specific organ systems in which isolated anomalies were nominally significantly associated with other-than-common benign copy number variants were the renal (P=.036) and cardiac systems (P=.012) but did not meet significance after the adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: When a fetal anomaly is detected on ultrasonogram, chromosomal microarray offers additional information over karyotype, the degree of which depends on the organ system involved. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: : II.


Subject(s)
Chromosome Aberrations , Chromosome Disorders/genetics , Congenital Abnormalities/diagnostic imaging , Karyotyping/statistics & numerical data , Ultrasonography, Prenatal/methods , Adult , Congenital Abnormalities/genetics , Female , Fetus , Humans , Pregnancy
3.
N Engl J Med ; 367(23): 2175-84, 2012 Dec 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23215555

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Chromosomal microarray analysis has emerged as a primary diagnostic tool for the evaluation of developmental delay and structural malformations in children. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy, efficacy, and incremental yield of chromosomal microarray analysis as compared with karyotyping for routine prenatal diagnosis. METHODS: Samples from women undergoing prenatal diagnosis at 29 centers were sent to a central karyotyping laboratory. Each sample was split in two; standard karyotyping was performed on one portion and the other was sent to one of four laboratories for chromosomal microarray. RESULTS: We enrolled a total of 4406 women. Indications for prenatal diagnosis were advanced maternal age (46.6%), abnormal result on Down's syndrome screening (18.8%), structural anomalies on ultrasonography (25.2%), and other indications (9.4%). In 4340 (98.8%) of the fetal samples, microarray analysis was successful; 87.9% of samples could be used without tissue culture. Microarray analysis of the 4282 nonmosaic samples identified all the aneuploidies and unbalanced rearrangements identified on karyotyping but did not identify balanced translocations and fetal triploidy. In samples with a normal karyotype, microarray analysis revealed clinically relevant deletions or duplications in 6.0% with a structural anomaly and in 1.7% of those whose indications were advanced maternal age or positive screening results. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of prenatal diagnostic testing, chromosomal microarray analysis identified additional, clinically significant cytogenetic information as compared with karyotyping and was equally efficacious in identifying aneuploidies and unbalanced rearrangements but did not identify balanced translocations and triploidies. (Funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01279733.).


Subject(s)
Chromosome Aberrations , Chromosome Disorders/diagnosis , Genetic Testing/methods , Karyotyping , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis , Prenatal Diagnosis/methods , Adult , Chromosomes, Human/genetics , Down Syndrome/diagnosis , Female , Fetal Diseases/diagnosis , Humans , Karyotype , Maternal Age , Pregnancy , Ultrasonography, Prenatal
4.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 12: 13, 2012 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22420582

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Preterm birth is the principal factor contributing to adverse outcomes in multiple pregnancies. Randomized controlled trials of progestogens to prevent preterm birth in twin pregnancies have shown no clear benefits. However, individual studies have not had sufficient power to evaluate potential benefits in women at particular high risk of early delivery (for example, women with a previous preterm birth or short cervix) or to determine adverse effects for rare outcomes such as intrauterine death. METHODS/DESIGN: We propose an individual participant data meta-analysis of high quality randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of progestogen treatment in women with a twin pregnancy. The primary outcome will be adverse perinatal outcome (a composite measure of perinatal mortality and significant neonatal morbidity). Missing data will be imputed within each original study, before data of the individual studies are pooled. The effects of 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate or vaginal progesterone treatment in women with twin pregnancies will be estimated by means of a random effects log-binomial model. Analyses will be adjusted for variables used in stratified randomization as appropriate. Pre-specified subgroup analysis will be performed to explore the effect of progestogen treatment in high-risk groups. DISCUSSION: Combining individual patient data from different randomized trials has potential to provide valuable, clinically useful information regarding the benefits and potential harms of progestogens in women with twin pregnancy overall and in relevant subgroups.


Subject(s)
Pregnancy Complications/prevention & control , Pregnancy Outcome , Pregnancy, Twin/drug effects , Premature Birth/prevention & control , Progestins/therapeutic use , Adult , Clinical Protocols , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Models, Statistical , Pregnancy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
5.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 192(5): 1357-61, 2005 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15902108

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the association between first trimester nuchal translucency measurement and the risk for major congenital heart defect in chromosomally normal fetuses. STUDY DESIGN: First trimester (10 weeks 4 days of gestation to 13 weeks 6 days of gestation) nuchal translucency was obtained in a large prospective multicenter National Institute of Child Health and Human Development study for Down syndrome prediction. The study, which was conducted between May 1998 and December 2000, was restricted to singleton pregnancies. Gestational age was determined by crown rump length measurements. Perinatal outcomes were determined and included the frequency of major congenital heart defect, which was defined as those cases that potentially could require surgery, intensive medical therapy, or prolonged follow-up time. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine whether nuchal translucency was a significant predictor of congenital heart defect. RESULTS: There were 8167 chromosomally normal pregnancies, of which 21 cases of major congenital heart defect were identified at follow-up examination (incidence, 2.6/1000 pregnancies). The risk of congenital heart defect rose with increasing nuchal translucency measurements. The mean nuchal translucency value for the normal and congenital heart defect groups were 1.5 mm and 1.9 mm, respectively (P = .05). With a nuchal translucency measurement of < 2.0 mm, the incidence of congenital heart defect was 13 of 6757 pregnancies (1.9 of every 1000 pregnancies). At 2.0 to 2.4 mm, the incidence was 5 of 1032 pregnancies (4.8 of every 1000 pregnancies). At 2.5 to 3.4 mm, the incidence was 2 of 335 pregnancies (6.0 of every 1000 pregnancies). At > or = 3.5 mm, the incidence was 1 of 43 pregnancies (23 of every 1000 pregnancies). Logistic regression analysis confirmed that nuchal translucency was associated significantly with congenital heart defect (odds ratio, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.4-3.1; P = .0004). CONCLUSION: Increased first trimester nuchal translucency measurement was associated with a higher risk of major congenital heart defect in chromosomally normal pregnancies. The practical implications of our findings are that patients with unexplained elevations of nuchal translucency may need referral for a fetal echocardiogram.


Subject(s)
Heart Defects, Congenital/diagnostic imaging , Nuchal Translucency Measurement , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Confidence Intervals , Female , Heart Defects, Congenital/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Logistic Models , Odds Ratio , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment
6.
Obstet Gynecol ; 105(3): 587-92, 2005 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15738029

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential relationship between placental disruption in weeks 13 and 14 and the subsequent development of gestational hypertension or preeclampsia. METHODS: Using subjects recruited during a randomized trial funded by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, which compared early amniocentesis and late transabdominal chorionic villus sampling (CVS) in weeks 13 and 14, rates of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia were compared between cases with varying degrees of placental disruption. RESULTS: A total of 3,698 of 3,775 randomized subjects had cytogenetically normal pregnancies and were analyzed. A significantly higher rate of hypertension/preeclampsia was observed in the late CVS group (5.4%, n = 1,878) compared with the early amniocentesis cohort (3.5%, n = 1,820; P = .005). This difference persisted after controlling for maternal age, body mass index, parity, previous preterm delivery, smoking, and fetal gender. Early amniocentesis cases were further stratified on the basis of whether the placenta had been penetrated (n = 460) or not (n = 1,360). Risk of hypertensive complications was lowest if the placenta was not traversed (3.4%), greater with placental penetration (3.9%), and highest when the placenta was directly sampled during CVS (5.4%, P = .02). CONCLUSION: We hypothesize that focal disruption of the placenta at 13-14 weeks may increase the risk of hypertension/preeclampsia. These findings provide support for the theory that disturbances in early placentation lead subsequently to maternal hypertension.


Subject(s)
Amniocentesis/adverse effects , Chorionic Villi Sampling/adverse effects , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced/etiology , Pre-Eclampsia/etiology , Female , Humans , Needles , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, First
7.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 191(4): 1452-8, 2004 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15507982

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the association between first-trimester trisomy 21 screening markers (free human chorionic gonadotropin-beta [hCG], pregnancy-associated plasma protein A [PAPP-A], and nuchal translucency) and adverse pregnancy outcome. STUDY DESIGN: This was a cohort study of 8012 patients enrolled in a National Institute of Child Health and Human Development-sponsored study of first-trimester trisomy 21 and 18 screening. Trisomy 21 and 18 risk results and individual marker levels in unaffected pregnancies and pregnancies with adverse outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: PAPP-A <1st percentile (OR 5.4, 95% CI 2.8-10.3) and PAPP-A <5th percentile (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.9-3.9) and free beta-hCG <1st percentile (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.3-5.9) were associated with increased risk of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) with positive predictive values of 24.1%, 14.1%, and 14.3%, respectively. PAPP-A <5th percentile (OR 2.3 95% CI 1.1-4.7) and nuchal translucency >99th percentile (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.1-11.3) were associated with increased risk of preterm delivery before 34 weeks. Increased risk at screening for trisomy 21 and 18 identified 16 of the 29 other chromosomal abnormalities (55%). Low free beta-hCG, low PAPP-A, and increased nuchal translucency were all associated with an increased rate of fetal abnormality. CONCLUSION: Extreme values of first-trimester free beta-hCG, PAPP-A, and nuchal translucency are all associated with adverse outcomes. The especially high predictive value for IUGR of PAPP-A levels below the 1st percentile suggests that patients within this group may benefit from increased surveillance for this condition.


Subject(s)
Chorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, Human/blood , Fetal Growth Retardation/blood , Nuchal Translucency Measurement , Pregnancy Outcome , Pregnancy Trimester, First/blood , Pregnancy-Associated Plasma Protein-A/analysis , Female , Humans , Odds Ratio , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity
8.
Obstet Gynecol ; 104(4): 661-6, 2004 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15458882

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance and use of second-trimester multiple-marker maternal serum screening for trisomy 21 by women who had previously undergone first-trimester combined screening (nuchal translucency, pregnancy-associated plasma protein A, and free beta-hCG), with disclosure of risk estimates. METHODS: In a multicenter, first-trimester screening study sponsored by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, multiple-marker maternal serum screening with alpha-fetoprotein, unconjugated estriol, and total hCG was performed in 4,145 (7 with trisomy 21) of 7,392 (9 with trisomy 21) women who were first-trimester screen-negative and 180 (7 with trisomy 21) of 813 (52 with trisomy 21) who were first-trimester screen-positive. Second-trimester risks were calculated using multiples of the median and a standardized risk algorithm with a cutoff risk of 1:270. RESULTS: Among the first-trimester screen-negative cohort, 6 of 7 (86%) trisomy 21 cases were detected by second-trimester multiple-marker maternal serum screening with a false-positive rate of 8.9%. Among the first-trimester screen-positive cohort, all 7 trisomy 21 cases were also detected in the second trimester, albeit with a 38.7% false-positive rate. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that a sequential screening program that provides patients with first-trimester results and offers the option for early invasive testing or additional serum screening in the second trimester can detect 98% of trisomy 21-affected pregnancies. However, such an approach will result in 17% of patients being considered at risk and, hence, potentially having an invasive test. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2


Subject(s)
Down Syndrome/diagnosis , Down Syndrome/epidemiology , Prenatal Diagnosis/methods , Adult , Algorithms , Canada/epidemiology , Chorionic Gonadotropin/blood , Cohort Studies , Decision Trees , Down Syndrome/blood , Down Syndrome/etiology , Estradiol/blood , False Positive Reactions , Female , Humans , Predictive Value of Tests , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Pregnancy Trimester, Second , Risk Factors , Sensitivity and Specificity , United States/epidemiology , alpha-Fetoproteins
9.
Obstet Gynecol ; 104(1): 30-6, 2004 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15228997

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the likelihood of clinical early and late pregnancy loss as a function of first-trimester maternal serum analytes and fetal nuchal translucency measurements. METHODS: Study subjects were recruited for a National Institute of Child Health and Human Development-sponsored multicenter cohort study initially designed to study the detection of Down syndrome during the first trimester of pregnancy. The cohort consisted of women who had a live fetus between 10 and 14 weeks of gestation and had no significant vaginal bleeding. Women with prior fetal trisomy (T21/18) and those with structural or chromosomal abnormalities in the index pregnancy were excluded. First-trimester screening consisted of pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A), free beta-hCG, and nuchal translucency. Pregnancy loss rates in women with various levels of PAPP-A, free beta-hCG, or nuchal translucency (less than 1st, less than 5th, more than 95th, and more than 99th percentile) were compared with losses in women with normal values (5th to 95th percentile). RESULTS: The mean gestational age at screening of 7,932 women meeting study criteria was 12.1 weeks. Loss rates were only 0.36% at less than 20 weeks after normal free beta-hCG, PAPP-A, and nuchal translucency. Conversely, low levels of PAPP-A and free beta-hCG as well as increased nuchal translucency were individually associated with increased early loss. These associations persisted after controlling for maternal age and race using logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSION: Normal values of PAPP-A, free beta-hCG, and nuchal translucency are associated with a very low risk of pregnancy loss at less than 20 weeks.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Spontaneous/diagnosis , Chorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, Human/blood , Neck/embryology , Pregnancy-Associated Plasma Protein-A/analysis , Adult , Cohort Studies , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Neck/diagnostic imaging , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Ultrasonography, Prenatal
10.
N Engl J Med ; 349(15): 1405-13, 2003 Oct 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14534333

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Screening for aneuploid pregnancies is routinely performed after 15 weeks of gestation and has a sensitivity of approximately 65 percent, with a false positive rate of 5 percent. First-trimester markers of aneuploidy have been developed, but their use in combination has not been adequately evaluated in clinical practice. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter study of screening for trisomies 21 and 18 among patients with pregnancies between 74 and 97 days of gestation, based on maternal age, maternal levels of free beta human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy-associated plasma protein A, and ultrasonographic measurement of fetal nuchal translucency. A screening result was considered to be positive for trisomy 21 if the calculated risk was at least 1 in 270 pregnancies and positive for trisomy 18 if the risk was at least 1 in 150. RESULTS: Screening was completed in 8514 patients with singleton pregnancies. This approach to screening identified 85.2 percent of the 61 cases of Down's syndrome (95 percent confidence interval, 73.8 to 93.0), with a false positive rate of 9.4 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 8.8 to 10.1). At a false positive rate of 5 percent, the detection rate was 78.7 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 66.3 to 88.1). Screening identified 90.9 percent of the 11 cases of trisomy 18 (95 percent confidence interval, 58.7 to 99.8), with a 2 percent false positive rate. Among women 35 years of age or older, screening identified 89.8 percent of fetuses with trisomy 21, with a false positive rate of 15.2 percent, and 100 percent of fetuses with trisomy 18. CONCLUSIONS: First-trimester screening for trisomies 21 and 18 on the basis of maternal age, maternal levels of free beta human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy-associated plasma protein A, and measurement of fetal nuchal translucency has good sensitivity at an acceptable false positive rate.


Subject(s)
Chorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, Human/blood , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 18 , Down Syndrome/diagnosis , Neck/diagnostic imaging , Pregnancy-Associated Plasma Protein-A/analysis , Prenatal Diagnosis/methods , Trisomy/diagnosis , False Positive Reactions , Female , Fetal Diseases/diagnosis , Fetal Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Maternal Age , Neck/embryology , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Risk Factors , Sensitivity and Specificity , Ultrasonography, Prenatal
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...