Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
Support Care Cancer ; 9(7): 545-51, 2001 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11680835

ABSTRACT

Our goal was to calculate resource use associated with administration of zoledronic acid, compared with pamidronate, as palliative care for patients with metastatic bone lesions. We conducted a time-and-motion study of therapy administration at each of three outpatient chemotherapy infusion sites participating in clinical trials of zoledronic acid and pamidronate. We developed a data-collection instrument to record all staff effort and patient resource use in drug administration. The main outcome measures were (a) direct costs of therapy administration per patient and (b) opportunity benefits expressed as the availability of resources gained per year. The average visit time for patients receiving the study dose of zoledronic acid, 4 mg, was 1 h, 6 min, compared to 2 h, 52 min for patients receiving a 90-mg dose of pamidronate. Infusion time accounted for much of the difference. In the base-case analysis, total direct costs per patient were $728 for zoledronic acid and $776 for pamidronate. The opportunity benefit for infusion of zoledronic acid vs pamidronate in the base case was 1.8 chairs per day, or 426 chairs per 240-workday year. Results were sensitive to changes in infusion facility size, days of operation, and average number of patients treated. Shorter infusion time associated with the administration of zoledronic acid, compared with pamidronate, yields substantial time savings for patients, as well as opportunity benefits for outpatient oncology facilities.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/economics , Bone Neoplasms/drug therapy , Bone Neoplasms/secondary , Diphosphonates/economics , Imidazoles/economics , Palliative Care/economics , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Costs and Cost Analysis , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Economics, Pharmaceutical , Humans , Imidazoles/therapeutic use , Pamidronate , Time and Motion Studies , Zoledronic Acid
2.
Am J Manag Care ; 7(8 Suppl): S268-75, 2001 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11474912

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine the economic implications of current irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) management practices and formulate recommendations based on these implications. METHODS: Relevant English-language research publications in which the direct and indirect costs of IBS were examined, identified using a search of records contained in Medline. RESULTS: Review of the identified publications indicates that in Western nations, IBS management is associated with high direct costs (particularly for diagnostic testing, office visits, pharmacotherapy, and emergency department visits). Indirect costs, associated with lost wages and decreased productivity, account for the largest proportion of the IBS economic burden. Moreover, rapid projected growth in IBS disease-related costs indicates a need for more focused attention toward improved treatment of IBS. More cost-effective management might be achieved by diagnosing and instituting nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic management earlier in the disease process. Under such an approach, patients are classified based on symptoms and a therapeutic trial is begun. More extensive, expensive diagnostic testing is reserved for patients refractory to treatment or for whom serious disease must be ruled out. CONCLUSION: IBS is a condition with high direct and indirect costs. Management strategies should be evaluated both on their clinical efficacy and on their cost effectiveness. As new, IBS-specific pharmacotherapies become available, the ability to diagnose and manage the condition in a cost-effective manner can be improved.


Subject(s)
Colonic Diseases, Functional/economics , Cost of Illness , Disease Management , Colonic Diseases, Functional/therapy , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Direct Service Costs , Humans , Office Visits , Treatment Outcome
3.
Support Care Cancer ; 9(3): 169-76, 2001 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11401101

ABSTRACT

Our goal was to evaluate the impact of pamidronate therapy on medical resource utilization for treatment of bone metastases among patients with breast cancer. In this 12-center retrospective study, inpatient and outpatient resource utilization was abstracted from the medical charts of 295 patients with breast cancer who were diagnosed with bone metastases between July 1996 and April 1999. Data were abstracted from the time of bone metastasis diagnosis (baseline) to the present. The analysis compared non-pamidronate patients against pamidronate patients, who were stratified on the basis of whether their pamidronate therapy had been initiated within 3 months (early pamidronate group) or more than 3 months (late pamidronate group) after diagnosis. Resource utilization was compared among groups using multivariate regression analyses. A total of 101 early pamidronate, 72 late pamidronate, and 122 non-pamidronate patients were included in the analysis. The results showed that the early pamidronate group was roughly one-half as likely to have unplanned office visits attributable to bone metastases as the late pamidronate and non-pamidronate groups. The groups had a similar likelihood of ever being hospitalized for bone-related conditions; however, among those hospitalized, there were roughly one-half as many bone-related hospitalizations in the late pamidronate group as in the non-pamidronate group. Also, the mean length of stay was approximately 50% shorter in both pamidronate groups than in the non-pamidronate group. We conclude that pamidronate therapy may be associated with less medical resource utilization, particularly among patients hospitalized for bone-related conditions.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Bone Neoplasms/drug therapy , Bone Neoplasms/secondary , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Hospitalization , Aged , Female , Humans , Length of Stay , Medical Records , Middle Aged , Pamidronate , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , United States
4.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 58(5): 389-95, 2001 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11258174

ABSTRACT

Community pharmacists' knowledge and behavior regarding the collection of copayments for prescription drugs from Medicaid recipients were studied. In fall 1998 a questionnaire was mailed to a random sample of 1465 community pharmacists (one pharmacist per drugstore) in Maryland, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia. The objectives were to determine the extent to which these pharmacists waived copayments for prescription drugs for Medicaid recipients, to document the pharmacists' knowledge of federal policies on Medicaid copayments, and to evaluate the factors associated with pharmacist copayment collection and knowledge of federal copayment policies. A total of 543 pharmacists (37%) responded. Most respondents indicated that they collected copayments for over 90% of drugs dispensed to Medicaid patients subject to copayment policies. Pharmacists most likely to waive Medicaid copayments practiced in drugstores with a high volume of Medicaid-related prescriptions and a large percentage of customers who were elderly Medicaid recipients. Pharmacists least likely to waive copayments believed that doing so would have a negative financial impact on the pharmacy. Nearly three fourths of the pharmacists exhibited fair or good knowledge of federal Medicaid copayment policies, but this varied widely by state. Many said that they would collect copayments in at least some situations even if this opposed federal policy. Pharmacists in Maryland, Pennsylvania and West Virginia had highly variable behavior patterns and knowledge with respect to the collection of drug copayments from Medicaid recipients.


Subject(s)
Medicaid/organization & administration , Pharmacies/organization & administration , Pharmacists , Fees, Pharmaceutical , Maryland , Pennsylvania , United States , West Virginia
5.
Oncologist ; 5(3): 250-9, 2000.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10884503

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Diarrhea is one of the dose-limiting toxicities associated with chemotherapy agents in treatment regimens for colorectal cancer. The objectives of this study were to analyze the impact of all grades of diarrhea on clinical decisions for patients receiving treatment for colorectal cancer by characterizing the diarrhea that occurred, quantifying changes in chemotherapy treatment, identifying methods to treat diarrhea, and determining the economic impact. Patients and Methods. We retrospectively reviewed the treatment of 100 consecutive patients with colorectal cancer who experienced diarrhea during the course of chemotherapy. The diarrhea was documented in the progress notes and graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. Changes in chemotherapy treatment and resource utilization associated with diarrhea were recorded. RESULTS: The 100 patients received 673 chemotherapy cycles, of which 45% +/- 2% were associated with diarrhea. Approximately 52% of patients experienced diarrhea of grades 3 or 4, and 56 patients underwent 66 modifications in their chemotherapy treatment, such as dose reductions (22), delays in therapy (8), discontinuations of therapy (15), or multiple changes (11). Thirty-seven patients consumed resources beyond oral antidiarrheals to control diarrhea: 14 patients received emergency outpatient treatment, 23 patients were hospitalized, 21 patients received intravenous fluids, and one death due to dehydration was reported. Discussion and Conclusion. Diarrhea was a significant consequence of colorectal chemotherapy, with the majority of patients experiencing grades 3 or 4 diarrhea and 56% of all patients also modifying their chemotherapy treatment. Even mild diarrhea of grades 1 and 2 was associated with changes in treatment in 11% of patients; thus, diarrhea of all grades should be recognized and treated appropriately to maintain full-dose chemotherapy.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Diarrhea/etiology , Adult , Aged , Antidiarrheals/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Dehydration/etiology , Diarrhea/complications , Diarrhea/pathology , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
6.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 95(5): 1323-30, 2000 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10811347

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The specific aims of this study were to develop a demographic description of a sample of patients presenting with bleeding esophageal varices and determine the direct health care costs of variceal bleeding. METHODS: This was a retrospective evaluation of patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy at the Portland VA Medical Center between January 1993 and May 1997. Data sources included both electronic databases and patient medical charts. The primary unit of analysis was an episode of care, defined as an index bleed plus 6 months of follow-up or death, whichever came first. RESULTS: The total inpatient direct cost was $1,566,904 and outpatient direct cost was $104,611, for a total of $1,671,515 for 100 bleeding episodes in 79 patients. Episodes of care for patients receiving < or =2 units of packed red blood cells were approximately a third as costly as those receiving >2 units of packed red blood cells (n = 17, $6,470 and n = 83, $17,553). The difference in costs was statistically significant (p < 0.05), and primarily attributable to hospital bed costs. CONCLUSIONS: There is a substantial financial burden associated with this illness, primarily attributable to inpatient costs. In addition to severity of bleeding, Child's class, endoscopic findings, and the timing of pharmacological therapy seem to influence the overall cost of managing esophageal varices.


Subject(s)
Esophageal and Gastric Varices/economics , Esophageal and Gastric Varices/therapy , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/economics , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/therapy , Drug Costs , Esophageal and Gastric Varices/complications , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology , Health Care Costs , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Costs , Hospitals, Veterans , Humans , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , United States
7.
Value Health ; 3(4): 261-9, 2000.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16464190

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Treatments for acromegaly, a growth hormone disorder, can be burdensome to patients, often requiring multiple self-administered injections daily. We developed the Impact on Lifestyle Questionnaire (ILQ) to measure the impact on patient's lifestyle imposed by the burden of injectable treatments for acromegaly. The primary objective of this study was to establish the reliability and validity of the ILQ. METHODS: The ILQ consists of the SF-12 and 30 additional questions. Thirty-four patients, from two sites, completed the ILQ and scales measuring related concepts. Fourteen patients also completed a retest survey 4 weeks later. Survey sample data were combined with ILQ data from another 56 patients with acromegaly for a factor analysis. Reliability was assessed with Cronbach's alpha and test-retest. Zero-order correlations were examined between ILQ subscales and symptoms, depression, SF-12 mental and physical components, a measure of self-care burden, appraisal of illness, and single-item measures of quality of life and satisfaction. RESULTS: The preconceived subscale structure was supported by factor analysis. These factors were internally consistent and stable over time. Good convergent validity was demonstrated between the Burden and Disruption scales with other measures of the burden of treatment. Patients indicated that they were generally compliant with therapy, and that treatment was not particularly burdensome or disruptive. Results based on the ILQ were consistent with other scales and qualitative responses. CONCLUSIONS: The ILQ has three subscales, Burden, Lifestyle Disruption, and Compliance, that are reliable and demonstrate preliminary evidence of construct validity.

8.
Health Care Financ Rev ; 20(3): 63-78, 1999.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10558021

ABSTRACT

In this article the authors present population-level prevalence rates for 61 specific drug-related problems occurring in three State Medicaid programs (Maryland, Iowa, and Washington) from 1989 through 1996 and a fourth (Georgia) from 1994 through 1996. The findings represent the first application of a consistent drug utilization review (DUR) screener program to Medicaid data across States. The study finds major differences in DUR failure rates among the four States with the lowest rates in Georgia and the highest in Washington. Only Iowa showed any population-level reduction in DUR failure rates during the study period, however, rates for community-dwelling elderly fell in most States.


Subject(s)
Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , Drug Therapy/classification , Georgia , Health Services Research , Humans , Insurance Claim Review , Iowa , Maryland , State Health Plans/organization & administration , United States , Washington
9.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 18(2): 201-12, 1999.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10091449

ABSTRACT

This DataWatch examines the impact of Medicaid prescription drug copayment policies in thirty-eight states using survey data from the 1992 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey. Findings indicate that elderly and disabled Medicaid recipients who reside in states with copay provisions have significantly lower rates of drug use than their counterparts in states without copayments. After controlling for other factors, we find that the primary effect of copayments is to reduce the likelihood that Medicaid recipients fill any prescription during the year. This burden falls disproportionately on recipients in poor health.


Subject(s)
Cost Sharing , Drug Costs , Drug Utilization/economics , Medicaid/economics , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Expenditures , Health Policy , Humans , Insurance, Pharmaceutical Services/economics , Regression Analysis , United States
10.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care ; 14(3): 446-57, 1998.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9780531

ABSTRACT

An economic evaluation of energy-absorbing flooring designed to prevent hip fractures revealed a payback period of 10 1/2 years if only direct costs avoided were evaluated and just over 11 months when direct and indirect costs were included. Cost-effectiveness ratios of less than $0 per hip fracture prevented and life year saved were also estimated.


Subject(s)
Accidental Falls/prevention & control , Floors and Floorcoverings/economics , Hip Fractures/prevention & control , Accidental Falls/economics , Accidental Falls/statistics & numerical data , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Costs and Cost Analysis , Floors and Floorcoverings/statistics & numerical data , Hip Fractures/economics , Humans , Pennsylvania , Risk Factors , Safety/economics , Safety/statistics & numerical data , Value of Life
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...