Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Diabetes Metab Disord ; : 1-9, 2023 May 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37363200

ABSTRACT

Objective: This study aimed at examining the psychometric properties of Persian version of Multidimensional Health Locus of Control scale, form C (MHLC-C) among Iranian type 2 diabetes. Method: This cross sectional study was conducted on 557 type 2 diabetes in eastern city of Iran in 2022. Participants were selected by proportional stratified sampling. The validity of MHLC-C was tested by face validity, content validity, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).Reliability of MHLC-C was assessed by McDonald omega coefficient, Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient. Results: Based on the results of EFA, 4 factors with eigenvalues greater than 1 were extracted, which explained 61.66% of the variance. In EFA, a question was removed. In CFA, the factor loading of all questions was more than 0.4 and the indexes of the goodness-of-fit were acceptable (for example: X2/df = 4.457, RMSEA: 0.079, CFI = 0.904, and PGFI = 0.663). McDonald omega coefficient and Cronbach's alpha coefficient of MHLC-C were 0.869 and 0.866. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient of MHLC-C was 0.817. Finally, the MHLC-C with 17 questions and 4 factors of chance (6 items), internal (5 items), other powerful people (3 items), and doctors (3 items) was approved. Conclusions: The Persian version of the MHLC-C questionnaire, with 17 questions and four factors, is a valid and reliable scale for Iranian type 2 diabetes to assess their health locus of control status.

2.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 5447, 2023 04 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37012271

ABSTRACT

Quality of life (QOL) in patients with diabetes is affected by multiple factors, and this study aimed to determine the effect of health locus of control points (HLOC) and diabetes health literacy (DHL) on QOL in Iranian patients with type 2 diabetes. This cross-sectional study was conducted between October 2021 and February 2022 among 564 people with type 2 diabetes. Patients were selected using proportional stratified sampling and simple random sampling methods. Data were collected using three questionnaires: (1) Multidimensional Health Locus of Control scale (form C), (2) World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale, and (3) Diabetes Health Literacy Scale. Data were analyzed by software's of SPSS V22 and AMOS V24. There was a positive and significant correlation between DHL and QOL. There was a positive and significant correlation between the subscales of internal HLOC, and doctors HLOC with QOL. According to the Path analysis results, all variables showed 58.93% of the direct effects and 41.07% of indirect effects of the final model. Numerate health literacy, informational health literacy, communicative health literacy, internal HLOC, other powerful people HLOC, chance HLOC, and doctors HLOC were able to predicted 49% variance of diabetes QOL (R2 = 0.49). The subscales of communicative health literacy, informational health literacy, internal HLOC, doctors HLOC, and chance HLOC had the greatest impact on QOL of people with diabetes. Based on the results of Path analysis, diabetes health literacy and HLOC play an effective role in QOL of diabetic. Therefore, there is a need to design and implement programs to improve the health literacy of patients as well as HLOC to improve QOL of patients.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Health Literacy , Humans , Quality of Life , Internal-External Control , Cross-Sectional Studies , Iran , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
Diabetol Metab Syndr ; 14(1): 139, 2022 Sep 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36167581

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the Persian version of Diabetes Health Literacy Scale in type 2 diabetic patients. METHOD: This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2021 in 1040 patients with type 2 diabetes in eastern Iran. Participants was selected by proportional stratified sampling method. The validity of DHLS was investigated through qualitative face validity, qualitative content validity, and structural validity (exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis). The reliability of DHLS was checked by Cronbach's alpha coefficient, McDonald omega coefficient, and test-retest. RESULTS: In exploratory factor analysis, 3 factors with eigenvalues greater than 1 were extracted, explaining 68.57% of the variance. These factors entered the confirmatory factor analysis, none of the questions were removed, and all questions had factor loading above 0.4. Cronbach's alpha coefficient and McDonald omega coefficient of DHLS were 0.919 and 0.922. Also, the Intraclass correlation coefficient of DHLS was 0.957. Finally, the DHLS was approved with 14 questions and the three subscales of Informational Health Literacy (6 items), Numerate Health Literacy (5 items), and Communicative Health Literacy (3 items). CONCLUSIONS: DHLS with 14 questions and the three subscales is a valid and reliable tool for examining diabetes health literacy in people with type 2 diabetes.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...