Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 69(10): 1657-1664, 2019 10 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30923816

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Untreated, chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection may lead to progressive liver damage, which can be mitigated by successful treatment. This integrated analysis reports the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of the ribavirin-free, direct-acting, antiviral, fixed-dose combination of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P) in patients with chronic HCV genotype 1-6 infections and compensated liver disease, including patients with chronic kidney disease stages 4 or 5 (CKD 4/5). METHODS: Data from 9 Phase II and III clinical trials, assessing the efficacy and safety of G/P treatment for 8-16 weeks, were included. The presence of cirrhosis was determined at screening using a liver biopsy, transient elastography, or serum biomarkers. The objectives were to evaluate safety, the rate of sustained virologic response at post-treatment week 12 (SVR12), and steady-state PK by cirrhosis status. RESULTS: Among 2369 patients, 308 (13%) were Child-Pugh Class A, including 20 with CKD 4/5. Overall, <1% of patients experienced an adverse event (AE) that led to G/P discontinuation or G/P-related serious AEs (SAEs). The most common AEs were headache and fatigue, occurring at similar frequencies with and without cirrhosis. SAEs were more common in patients with CKD 4/5, but all were unrelated to G/P. There were no cases of drug-induced liver injury or clinically relevant hepatic decompensation. SVR12 rates were 96.4% (297/308) with compensated cirrhosis and 97.5% (2010/2061) without cirrhosis. PK analysis demonstrated a 2.2-fold increase in glecaprevir exposure, but not pibrentasvir exposure, in patients with compensated cirrhosis. CONCLUSIONS: G/P was safe and efficacious in patients with compensated liver disease, including those with CKD 4/5. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02243280, NCT02243293, NCT02604017, NCT02640482, NCT02640157, NCT02636595, NCT02642432, NCT02651194, and NCT02446717.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/pharmacokinetics , Benzimidazoles/pharmacokinetics , Hepatitis C, Chronic/drug therapy , Liver Diseases/drug therapy , Quinoxalines/pharmacokinetics , Sulfonamides/pharmacokinetics , Aged , Aminoisobutyric Acids , Antiviral Agents/adverse effects , Benzimidazoles/adverse effects , Cyclopropanes , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Genotype , Hepacivirus/drug effects , Hepacivirus/genetics , Hepatitis C, Chronic/virology , Humans , Lactams, Macrocyclic , Leucine/analogs & derivatives , Liver Cirrhosis/drug therapy , Liver Diseases/virology , Male , Proline/analogs & derivatives , Pyrrolidines , Quinoxalines/adverse effects , Sulfonamides/adverse effects , Sustained Virologic Response
2.
PLoS One ; 14(1): e0208506, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30601818

ABSTRACT

Finding safe and effective treatments for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in the elderly is of clinical interest given the comorbidities and associated polypharmacy in this population. However, the number of patients older than age 65 years enrolled into clinical trials of anti-HCV medications generally have been limited and thus reaching meaningful conclusions for this demographic has been difficult. Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir is a once-daily, all-oral, ribavirin-free, pangenotypic direct-acting antiviral (DAA) combination therapy that has demonstrated high sustained virologic response rates at post-treatment week 12 (SVR12) and a favorable safety profile in patients with chronic HCV infection. This analysis evaluated the safety and efficacy of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in patients aged ≥65 years. Data were pooled for treatment-naïve and -experienced patients with chronic HCV genotype (GT) 1-6 infections who received glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for 8, 12, or 16 weeks in 9 Phase 2 and 3 trials. SVR12 and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated for patients aged ≥65 versus <65 years. Of the 2369 patients enrolled, 328 (14%) were aged ≥65 years. Among patients aged ≥65 years, 42% and 34% had GT1 and GT2, respectively; 40% were treatment-experienced and 20% had compensated cirrhosis. Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir treatment resulted in SVR12 rates of 97.9% (95% CI, 96.3-99.4; n/N = 321/328) for patients aged ≥65 years and 97.3% (95% CI, 96.6-98.0; n/N = 1986/2041) for patients aged <65 years. The rates were not significantly different between the two age groups (P = 0.555). DAA-related AEs leading to treatment discontinuation, or serious AEs were similarly rare (<0.5%) for patients ≥65 and <65 years old. Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir is an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment option for patients aged ≥65 years with chronic HCV infection.


Subject(s)
Benzimidazoles/adverse effects , Benzimidazoles/therapeutic use , Hepatitis C, Chronic/drug therapy , Quinoxalines/adverse effects , Quinoxalines/therapeutic use , Sulfonamides/adverse effects , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use , Aged , Aminoisobutyric Acids , Cyclopropanes , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Hepatitis C, Chronic/virology , Humans , Kidney/pathology , Lactams, Macrocyclic , Leucine/analogs & derivatives , Male , Proline/analogs & derivatives , Pyrrolidines , Treatment Outcome
3.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 17(3): 527-535.e6, 2019 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30012435

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly prescribed to treat acid-related disorders. Some direct-acting antiviral regimens for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection have reduced efficacy in patients taking concomitant acid-reducing agents, including PPIs, due to interactions between drugs. We analyzed data from 9 multicenter, phase 2 and 3 trials to determine the efficacy and pharmacokinetics of an HCV therapeutic regimen comprising glecaprevir and pibrentasvir (glecaprevir/pibrentasvir) in patients taking concomitant acid-reducing agents. METHODS: We analyzed data from 2369 patients infected with HCV genotypes 1-6 and compensated liver disease treated with an all-oral regimen of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for 8-16 weeks. We compared efficacy and pharmacokinetics among patients receiving at least 1 dose of an acid-reducing agent (a PPI, an H2 blocker, or antacid). High-dose PPI was defined as daily dose greater than 20 mg omeprazole dose equivalent. The objectives were to evaluate rate of sustained virologic response 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR12) and to assess steady-state glecaprevir and pibrentasvir exposures in patients on acid-reducing agents. RESULTS: Of the 401 patients (17%) who reported use of acid-reducing agents, 263 took PPIs (11%; 109 patients took a high-dose PPI and 154 patients took a low-dose PPI). Rates of SVR12 were 97.0% among patients who used acid-reducing agents and 97.5% among those not using acid-reducing agents (P = .6). An SVR12 was achieved in 96.3% taking a high-dose PPI and 97.4% taking a low-dose PPI, with no virologic failures in those receiving a high-dose PPI (P = .7). Glecaprevir, but not pibrentasvir, bioavailability was affected; its exposure decreased by 41% in patients taking a high-dose PPI. CONCLUSIONS: In an analysis of data from 9 clinical trials, we observed a high rate of SVR12 (approximately 97%) among patients treated with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for HCV infection-even among patients taking concomitant ARA or high-dose PPI. This was despite decreased glecaprevir exposures in patients when on high-dose PPIs. ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT02243280 (SURVEYOR-I), NCT02243293 (SURVEYOR-II), NCT02604017 (ENDURANCE-1), NCT02640482 (ENDURANCE-2), NCT02640157 (ENDURANCE-3), NCT02636595 (ENDURANCE-4), NCT02642432 (EXPEDITION-1), NCT02651194 (EXPEDITION-4), NCT02446717 (MAGELLAN-I).


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage , Antiviral Agents/pharmacokinetics , Benzimidazoles/administration & dosage , Benzimidazoles/pharmacokinetics , Hepatitis C, Chronic/drug therapy , Proton Pump Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Pyrrolidines/administration & dosage , Pyrrolidines/pharmacokinetics , Quinoxalines/administration & dosage , Quinoxalines/pharmacokinetics , Sulfonamides/administration & dosage , Sulfonamides/pharmacokinetics , Administration, Oral , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Animals , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Drug Combinations , Drug Interactions , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sustained Virologic Response , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
4.
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 4(1): 45-51, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30393106

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The pangenotypic direct-acting antiviral regimen of glecaprevir coformulated with pibrentasvir is approved to treat chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1-6 infection in adults. In registrational studies, 84 (99%) of 85 patients with HCV genotype 5 or 6 infection achieved a sustained virological response (SVR) with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir, with no virological failures. To increase the body of data for these less prevalent genotypes, ENDURANCE-5,6 evaluated the efficacy and safety of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir exclusively in patients infected with HCV genotype 5 or 6. METHODS: ENDURANCE-5,6 was a phase 3b, single-arm, open-label, multicentre trial done in 24 hospitals or clinics in Europe, Oceania, North America, South Africa, and southeast Asia. Adults with chronic HCV genotype 5 or 6 infection who were previously untreated or treatment-experienced were eligible to be enrolled. Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (300 mg/120 mg) was given orally once daily for 8 weeks (for patients without cirrhosis) or 12 weeks (for patients with compensated cirrhosis). The primary efficacy endpoint was SVR12 (ie, HCV RNA <15 IU/mL at 12 weeks post-treatment), assessed within each HCV genotype, and analysed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02966795. FINDINGS: Between Feb 9, 2017, and Aug 28, 2018, 84 patients were enrolled: 23 with genotype 5 infection and 61 with genotype 6 infection. Overall, 82 (97·6%, 95% CI 94·4-100·0) of the 84 patients achieved SVR12. 22 (95·7%, 95% CI 87·3-100·0) of 23 patients with genotype 5 infection achieved SVR12, as did 60 (98·4%, CI 95·2-100·0) of 61 with genotype 6 infection. One patient with an HCV genotype 6f infection and cirrhosis had on-treatment virological failure at treatment week 12, and one patient with HCV genotype 5a without cirrhosis who had achieved SVR at post-treatment week 4 relapsed at post-treatment week 12. Five (6%) patients had serious adverse events, none of which were deemed related to glecaprevir/pibrentsavir or led to discontinuation. Fatigue (11 [13%] patients) and headache (11 [13%]) were the only adverse events that occurred in 10% or more of patients. No post-baseline grade 3 or higher increases in aminotransferase concentrations were reported. INTERPRETATION: Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir achieved high SVR12 rates, comparable with data reported in registrational studies, and was well tolerated in patients with HCV genotype 5 or 6 infection with compensated liver disease. FUNDING: AbbVie.


Subject(s)
Benzimidazoles/adverse effects , Benzimidazoles/therapeutic use , Genotype , Hepatitis C, Chronic/drug therapy , Hepatitis C, Chronic/genetics , Quinoxalines/adverse effects , Quinoxalines/therapeutic use , Sulfonamides/adverse effects , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Aminoisobutyric Acids , Cyclopropanes , Drug Combinations , Fatigue/chemically induced , Female , Headache/chemically induced , Humans , Lactams, Macrocyclic , Leucine/analogs & derivatives , Male , Middle Aged , Proline/analogs & derivatives , Pyrrolidines , Sustained Virologic Response , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
5.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 16(3): 417-426, 2018 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28951228

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) has high genotypic diversity and global distribution. Agents that are effective against all major HCV genotypes, with shorter treatment duration, are needed to reduce disease burden. Glecaprevir (an NS3/4A protease inhibitor) and pibrentasvir (an NS5A inhibitor) have a high barrier to resistance and synergistic antiviral activity. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of 8 and 12 weeks' treatment with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in patients with HCV genotype 2, 4, 5, or 6 infection without cirrhosis in 3 separate phase 3 trials. METHODS: We performed 2 open label, single-arm studies (SURVEYOR-II, Part 4 and ENDURANCE-4) and a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (ENDURANCE-2). In the ENDURANCE-2 study, adult patients with untreated or previously treated HCV genotype 2 infection without cirrhosis were randomly assigned (2:1) to groups given once-daily oral glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (n = 202; 300 mg/120 mg) or placebo (n = 100) for 12 weeks. In the SURVEYOR-II, Part 4 and ENDURANCE-4 studies, adult patients with untreated or previously treated patients with HCV genotype 2, genotype 4, genotype 5, or genotype 6 infection, without cirrhosis, were given once-daily oral glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (n = 121 in ENDURANCE-4 and n = 145 in SURVEYOR-II) for 12 or 8 weeks, respectively. In all studies the primary endpoint was sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12) in the intention-to-treat population. RESULTS: Among patients receiving glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for 8 weeks, rates of SVR12 were 98% (95% CI, 94.1-99.3) in those infected with HCV genotype 2 and 93% (95% CI, 83.6-97.3) in those infected with HCV genotypes 4, 5, or 6. Among patients receiving glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for 12 weeks, rates of SVR12 were 99.5% (95% CI, 98.5-100) in those infected with HCV genotype 2 and 99% (95% CI, 97.6-100) in those infected with HCV genotype 4, 5, or 6. No virologic failures occurred in patients with HCV genotype 4, 5, or 6 infections. The frequency and severity of adverse events in patients receiving glecaprevir/pibrentasvir were similar to those of patients who received placebo. CONCLUSION: In 3 Phase 3 studies, 8 weeks' treatment with glecaprevir/pibrentasivr produced an SVR12 in at least 93% of patients with chronic HCV genotype 2, 4, 5, or 6 infection without cirrhosis, with virologic failure in less than 1%. The drug combination had a safety profile comparable to 12 week's treatment with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir. ClinicalTrials.gov numbers: NCT02640482 (ENDURANCE-2), NCT02636595 (ENDURANCE-4), and NCT02243293 (SURVEYOR-II).


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Benzimidazoles/therapeutic use , Hepatitis C, Chronic/drug therapy , Quinoxalines/therapeutic use , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Aminoisobutyric Acids , Antiviral Agents/adverse effects , Benzimidazoles/adverse effects , Cyclopropanes , Double-Blind Method , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/pathology , Female , Genotype , Hepacivirus/classification , Hepacivirus/genetics , Hepatitis C, Chronic/virology , Humans , Lactams, Macrocyclic , Leucine/analogs & derivatives , Male , Middle Aged , Placebos/administration & dosage , Proline/analogs & derivatives , Pyrrolidines , Quinoxalines/adverse effects , Sulfonamides/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
6.
J Clin Pharmacol ; 57(12): 1616-1624, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28800195

ABSTRACT

Glecaprevir and pibrentasvir are direct-acting antiviral agents being developed as combination therapy for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection. The aim of the present studies was to assess the effect of race and ethnicity (white, Han Chinese, Japanese) on the pharmacokinetics and safety of multiple oral doses of glecaprevir and pibrentasvir given alone and in combination. Two multiple-dose, single-center, phase 1 studies were conducted in healthy adult male and female subjects (n = 170) of respective Asian and white race/ethnicity. Glecaprevir (100, 200, 300, or 700 mg once daily) and pibrentasvir (80, 120, or 160 mg once daily) were administered alone for 7 days followed by the combination of both direct-acting antiviral agents for another 7 days. Intensive blood sampling was performed, and pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by noncompartmental analyses. ANOVA was employed to evaluate for differences of steady-state glecaprevir and pibrentasvir exposures between Asian (Japanese or Han Chinese) and white subjects. Glecaprevir and pibrentasvir exposures in Han Chinese and Japanese were similar to those in whites across dose levels. The nonlinear dose-exposure relationships for glecaprevir and pibrentasvir were similar across Japanese, Han Chinese, and white subjects, and the safety profiles of the agents were comparable across these groups. The results of these studies demonstrate that race/ethnicity has no clinically meaningful impact on direct-acting antiviral agent exposures, safety, or tolerability of the glecaprevir and pibrentasvir combination. This is supported in part by the large global registration program of the pangenotypic, coformulated fixed-dose glecaprevir/pibrentasvir regimen and allows for inclusion of diverse ethnic populations.


Subject(s)
Asian People , Benzimidazoles/adverse effects , Benzimidazoles/pharmacokinetics , Quinoxalines/adverse effects , Quinoxalines/pharmacokinetics , Sulfonamides/adverse effects , Sulfonamides/pharmacokinetics , White People , Adult , Aminoisobutyric Acids , Antiviral Agents , Area Under Curve , Benzimidazoles/therapeutic use , Cyclopropanes , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Half-Life , Hepatitis C, Chronic/drug therapy , Humans , Lactams, Macrocyclic , Leucine/analogs & derivatives , Male , Middle Aged , Proline/analogs & derivatives , Pyrrolidines , Quinoxalines/therapeutic use , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use
7.
J Infect Dis ; 205(7): 1100-10, 2012 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22351940

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Current therapies for genital herpes have only partial efficacy. Helicase-primase inhibitors are novel, potent inhibitors of herpes simplex virus replication. METHODS: This randomized trial assessed the safety and efficacy of ASP2151 for episodic therapy of recurrent genital herpes. Participants self-initiated with ASP2151 (100, 200, or 400 mg daily for 3 days), ASP2151 (1200 mg as a single dose), placebo for 3 days, or valacyclovir (500 mg twice daily for 3 days). The primary efficacy endpoint, time to lesion healing excluding aborted lesions, was analyzed using a proportional hazards model. Statistical significance was determined by P = .01. RESULTS: Of 695 adults enrolled, 437 experienced a recurrence and received study drug. Median time for lesion healing excluding aborted lesions was 139.8 hours with placebo, 119.6 hours with ASP2151 (100 mg; hazard ratio [HR], 1.40; P = .065), 106.2 with ASP2151 (200 mg; HR, 1.40; P = .081), 115.9 with ASP2151 (400 mg; HR, 1.25; P = .25), 102.1 with ASP2151 (1200 mg; HR, 1.72; P = .007), and 113.9 with valacyclovir (500 mg twice daily; HR, 1.42; P = .077), indicating improvement in all treatment groups except ASP2151 (400 mg). Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar across groups. CONCLUSIONS: Three-day or single-day courses of ASP2151 appear to be effective and safe options for treatment of episodes of recurrent genital herpes. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT00486200.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage , Herpes Genitalis/drug therapy , Oxadiazoles/administration & dosage , Acyclovir/administration & dosage , Acyclovir/adverse effects , Acyclovir/analogs & derivatives , Adult , Antiviral Agents/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Oxadiazoles/adverse effects , Placebos/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome , Valacyclovir , Valine/administration & dosage , Valine/adverse effects , Valine/analogs & derivatives
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...