The influence of other than prolactin hormones on bone mineral density in women with hyperprolactinaemia of various origins.

OBJECTIVE: Hyperprolactinaemia may lead to bone loss, both due to hypogonadism and other hormonal disturbances. Aim of the case-control study was the analysis of influences of hormonal profiles associated with hyperprolactinaemia on the bone mineral density (BMD) in women with hyperprolactinaemia of various origin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The subjects were 32 patients with prolactinoma, 43 ones with functional hyperprolactinaemia and 29 healthy controls. All of them were studied for BMD (lumbar spine, proximal femur, forearm, total body) by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and their correlations with hormones levels (prolactin, oestradiol, luteinising hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEA-S), insulin-like growth factor-1 and intact parathyroid hormone) using Spearman correlation analysis and multiple regression analysis model. RESULTS: Correlation analysis revealed the anabolic influence of PTH on lumbar spine in women with prolactinoma, and on ultradistal radius in functional hyperprolactinaemia. In multiple regression analysis, oestradiol had greatest influence on lumbar spine and total body BMD. Moreover, positive influence of testosterone, SHBG on spine BMD, and of oestradiol, testosterone, SHBG and DHEA-S on total body BMD were observed in patients with prolactinoma. CONCLUSION: Hormonal disturbances associated with hyperprolactinaemia influence BMD more in patients with prolactinoma than in ones with functional hyperprolactinaemia.

The role of cyclase activating (CAP) and cyclase inhibiting (CIP) parathormone fractions in the assessment of bone metabolism disturbances in women with hyperprolactinemia of various origin.

OBJECTIVES: Hyperprolactinemia could be one of possible causes of bone loss. The reason is thought to be connected with hypogonadism due to PRL excess and the role of other hormones like PTH and PTH-rP. There is no data on the influence of PTH fractions (CAP and CIP) on bone turnover and density in hyperprolactinemia. The aim of the study was to assess the influence of PTH and its fractions on bone metabolism in hyperprolactinemia of various origin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was carried out in 75 women. Group I consisted of 32 women with prolactinoma, group II consisted of 43 women with functional hyperprolactinemia. Both groups were subdivided in patients with hypogonadism and normal gonadal function. The control group consisted of 29 healthy women. In all subjects PRL, PTH and its fractions (CAP, CIP), and bone turnover markers (BAP, ICTP) were studied. BMD measurement was carried out using DXA. RESULTS: In patients with functional hyperprolactinemia i-PTH and CAP levels were lower than in controls. CIP concentrations were lower in patients than in controls. CAP/CIP ratio was higher in patients with prolactinoma than in patients with functional hyperprolactinemia and controls. Higher values of bone turnover markers (BAP, ICTP) in patients groups and subgroups were shown as compared to controls. Some correlations between PTH and its fractions, and BMD and bone turnover were observed. CONCLUSIONS: There is no direct benefit from the assessment of parathormone fractions and CAP/CIP ratio in the prognosis of bone metabolism changes in hyperprolactinemia of various origin.

Bone mineral density and bone turnover in hyperprolactinaemia of various origins.

INTRODUCTION: Osteopenia and osteoporosis because of hyperprolactinaemia caused by prolactinoma may be followed by an increased risk of fracture. There are no data on the bone effects of functional hyperprolactinaemia. The aim was to assess the influence of hyperprolactinaemia of various origins on bone turnover and density in different skeletal sites. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was carried out in 75 women (aged 30.53 +/- 7.8): Group I--32 women with prolactinoma and Group II--43 women with functional hyperprolactinaemia. Both groups of patients were subdivided into those with hypogonadism and those with normal gonadal function. The control group consisted of 29 healthy women aged (33.59 +/- 4.7). In all subjects PRL and bone turnover markers (BAP, OC, ICTP) were studied. BMD measurements (lumbar spine, forearm, proximal femur and total body) were carried out using DXA. RESULTS: Higher PRL concentrations were observed in patients than in controls. The values of bone turnover markers (BAP, ICTP) were shown to be higher in patient groups and subgroups than in controls. In patients with prolactinoma lumbar spine BMD was lower than in patients with functional hyperprolactinaemia and controls. Total body BMD was also lower, albeit to a lesser extent. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperprolactinaemia caused by prolactinoma in women influences bone metabolism unfavourably, more by the impact on the activity of bone turnover markers than on BMD. This provides an opportunity for earlier assessment of bone metabolism disturbances before the BMD changes can be observed. Functional hyperprolactinaemia does not determine such a harmful effect on bone metabolism as hyperprolactinemia due to prolactinoma.

Bone mineral density and turnover in patients with acromegaly in relation to sex, disease activity, and gonadal function.

Acromegaly is a rare disease caused by growth hormone (GH) hypersecretion. GH and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) exert anabolic activity in bones. Nevertheless, bone mineral density (BMD) loss is not uncommon in patients with acromegaly. It is assumed to be due to hypogonadism associated with the acromegaly. The aim of the study was to examine BMD at various skeletal sites and bone turnover and to assess the influence of impaired gonadal function and disease activity on BMD and turnover changes in acromegaly. A total of 62 patients were studied (40 women, 22 men). Among the women, 22 had active disease and 18 were cured; 16 women had normal gonadal function, and 24 were hypogonadal. Altogether, 12 men presented with active acromegaly, and 10 were cured; normal gonadal function was found in 10 men, and hypogonadism was diagnosed in 12 men. Controls were 30 healthy subjects. Densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine, proximal femur, forearm, and total body was carried out. Bone turnover was studied based on serum osteocalcin, C-terminal collagen type 1 crosslinks, and bone alkaline phosphatase concentration. A disadvantageous effect of acromegaly on bone density was associated with hypogonadism in the distal radius (in women), the proximal femur (in men), and the total body (both sexes). An anabolic effect of GH during active acromegaly was present in the proximal femur only in men. We confirmed increased bone turnover in the presence of acromegaly, and these changes were similar regarding the activity of the disease and the gonadal status.