Venous and arterial thromboembolic risk of Janus kinase inhibitors: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Preliminary data led licencing authorities to alert clinicians of an increased venous thrombotic risk associated to the use of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors (JAKi). We performed a systematic review to estimate the risk of venous and arterial thrombosis associated to JAKi for the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on JAKi in patients with IMIDs were identified by the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases until October 2021. Risk of bias was assessed according to Cochrane criteria. The beta-binomial model was applied to calculate pooled odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% CI. The PROSPERO registration number is CRD42022324143. RESULTS: We have included one phase I, 21 phase II, three phase II-III and 36 phase III RCTs for a total of 19 443 patients in the JAKi group and 6354 in the control group. Thirty-one (unweighted rate 0.16%; 95% CI: 0.10, 0.21) events were reported in the JAKi group and 20 (unweighted rate 0.22%; 95% CI: 0.12, 0.32) in the control group in a mean follow-up of 16.8 weeks. IMID patients treated with JAKi did not have an increased thromboembolic risk compared with those treated with placebo (OR 0.82; 95% CI: 0.43, 1.56). No statistically different results were seen in subanalyses for each investigated IMID, drug and dosage. CONCLUSION: JAKi do not increase thromboembolic risk compared with placebo in IMID patients enrolled in selected RCTs.

JAK inhibitors and psoriatic arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Despite the therapeutic armamentarium for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) has considerably expanded over the last thirty years, additional drugs are needed to improve care of this disease. JAK inhibitors (JAKinhibs) are small molecules able to interfere with the JAK/STAT pathway, involved in the pathogenesis of PsA. Tofacitinib and Upadacitinib were recently approved for the treatment of PsA. Our aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of JAKinhibs for the treatment of PsA. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify RCTs by electronic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE database until April 2021. RCTs were considered eligible if included only patients with PsA treated with JAKinhibs. The pooled efficacy and safety outcomes were calculated by meta-analysis and expressed as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Statistical heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 statistic. RESULTS: Five RCTs for a total of 3293 PsA patients treated with different JAKinhibs or placebo were included (2 phase III studies on Tofacitinib, 1 phase II study on Filgotinib and 2 phase III studies on Upadacitinib). All the studies were judged at low risk of bias according to Cochrane criteria. JAKinhibs showed a significantly higher ACR20 response rate compared to placebo (OR 3.78, 95% CI 2.72-5.24, I^2 = 57%, random effect model).and were associated with a non-statistically significant higher risk of serious adverse events (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.14-2.82, I^2 = 46%, random effect model). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first systematic review that performed a comprehensive evaluation of the efficacy and safety of JAKinhibs for PsA in RCTs. Our analysis suggests a statistically significant benefit of JAKinhibs that appear to be effective and safe over placebo for the treatment of PsA.