Risk Factors for Microscopic Disease Positivity at Ileocolic Resection Margins for Crohn's Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Interest in microscopic margin positivity during surgical resection of medical-refractory Crohn's disease has been renewed with multiple recent studies showing an association between microscopic margin positivity with disease recurrence. Our aim was to determine risk factors for microscopic margin disease positivity following ileocolic resection (ICR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospectively-maintained database of patients with Crohn's disease undergoing ICR at a tertiary-referral center was queried. Margin positivity was defined as the presence of cryptitis, erosion, transmural inflammation with lymphoid aggregates, or architectural distortion at either ileal (proximal) or colonic (distal) margins. RESULTS: Amongst 584 patients, 97 patients had a positive microscopic margin (17%) of which 46% had a positive proximal margin, 17% had a positive distal margin, and 13% had both positive and distal margins. Using multivariable logistic regression analysis, index ICR was associated with less odds of positive margin (odds ratio [OR] 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.24-0.89, p=0.02), and granuloma presence was associated with increased odds (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.23-4.21, p=0.01). CONCLUSION: We found that repeat ileocolic resection and granuloma presence were predictors of microscopic margin disease.

Blinded Intraoperative Quantitative Indocyanine Green Metrics Associate With Intestinal Margin Acceptance in Colorectal Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Indocyanine green is a useful tool in colorectal surgery. Quantitative values may enhance and standardize its application. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether quantitative indocyanine green metrics correlate with standard subjective indocyanine green perfusion assessment in acceptance or rejection of anastomotic margins. DESIGN: Prospective single-arm, single-institution cohort study. Surgeons viewed subjective indocyanine green images but were blinded to quantitative indocyanine green metrics. SETTING: Tertiary academic center. PATIENTS: Adults undergoing planned intestinal resection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Accepted perfusion and rejected perfusion of the intestinal margin were defined by the absence or presence of ischemia by subjective indocyanine green and gross inspection. The primary outcomes included quantitative indocyanine green values, maximum fluorescence, and time-to-maximum fluorescence in accepted compared to rejected perfusion. Secondary outcomes included maximum fluorescence and time-to-maximum fluorescence values in anastomotic leak. RESULTS: There were 89 perfusion assessments comprising 156 intestinal segments. Nine segments were subjectively assessed to have poor perfusion by visual inspection and subjective indocyanine green. Maximum fluorescence (% intensity) exhibited higher intensity in accepted perfusion (accepted perfusion 161% [82%-351%] vs rejected perfusion 63% [10%-76%]; p = 0.03). Similarly, time-to-maximum fluorescence (seconds) was earlier in accepted perfusion compared to rejected perfusion (10 seconds [1-40] vs 120 seconds [90-120]; p < 0.01). Increased BMI was associated with higher maximum fluorescence. Anastomotic leak did not correlate with maximum fluorescence or time-to-maximum fluorescence. LIMITATIONS: Small cohort study, not powered to measure the association between quantitative indocyanine green metrics and anastomotic leak. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that blinded quantitative values reliably correlate with subjective indocyanine green perfusion assessment. Time-to-maximum intensity is an important metric in perfusion evaluation. Quantitative indocyanine green metrics may enhance intraoperative intestinal perfusion assessment. Future studies may attempt to correlate quantitative indocyanine green values with anastomotic leak. See Video Abstract . LAS MTRICAS CUANTITATIVAS INTRAOPERATORIAS CIEGAS DEL VERDE DE INDOCIANINA SE ASOCIAN CON LA ACEPTACIN DEL MARGEN INTESTINAL EN LA CIRUGA COLORRECTAL: ANTECEDENTES:El verde de indocianina es una herramienta útil en la cirugía colorrectal. Los valores cuantitativos pueden mejorar y estandarizar su aplicación.OBJETIVO:Determinar si las métricas cuantitativas de verde de indocianina se correlacionan con la evaluación subjetiva estándar de perfusión de verde de indocianina en la aceptación o rechazo de los márgenes anastomóticos.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte prospectivo de un solo brazo y de una sola institución. Los cirujanos vieron imágenes subjetivas de verde de indocianina, pero no conocían las métricas cuantitativas de verde de indocianina.AJUSTE:Centro académico terciario.PACIENTES:Adultos sometidos a resección intestinal planificada.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:La perfusión aceptada y la perfusión rechazada del margen intestinal se definieron por la ausencia o presencia de isquemia mediante verde de indocianina subjetiva y la inspección macroscópica. Los resultados primarios fueron los valores cuantitativos de verde de indocianina, la fluorescencia máxima y el tiempo hasta la fluorescencia máxima en la perfusión aceptada en comparación con la rechazada. Los resultados secundarios incluyeron la fluorescencia máxima y el tiempo hasta alcanzar los valores máximos de fluorescencia en la fuga anastomótica.RESULTADOS:Se realizaron 89 evaluaciones de perfusión, comprendiendo 156 segmentos intestinales. Se evaluó subjetivamente que 9 segmentos tenían mala perfusión mediante inspección visual y verde de indocianina subjetiva. La fluorescencia máxima (% de intensidad) mostró una mayor intensidad en la perfusión aceptada [Perfusión aceptada 161% (82-351) vs Perfusión rechazada 63% (10-76); p = 0,03]. De manera similar, el tiempo hasta la fluorescencia máxima (segundos) fue más temprano en la perfusión aceptada en comparación con la rechazada [10 s (1-40) frente a 120 s (90-120); p < 0,01]. Aumento del índice de masa corporal asociado con una fluorescencia máxima más alta. La fuga anastomótica no se correlacionó con la fluorescencia máxima ni con el tiempo hasta la fluorescencia máxima.LIMITACIONES:Estudio de cohorte pequeño, sin poder para medir la asociación entre las mediciones cuantitativas del verde de indocianina y la fuga anastomótica.CONCLUSIÓN:Demostramos que los valores cuantitativos ciegos se correlacionan de manera confiable con la evaluación subjetiva de la perfusión de verde de indocianina. El tiempo hasta la intensidad máxima es una métrica importante en la evaluación de la perfusión. Las métricas cuantitativas de verde de indocianina pueden mejorar la evaluación de la perfusión intestinal intraoperatoria. Los estudios futuros pueden intentar correlacionar los valores cuantitativos de verde de indocianina con la fuga anastomótica. (Traducción-Dr. Yolanda Colorado).

Prospective Randomized Trial of Immediate Postoperative Use of Regular Diet Versus Clear Liquid Diet in Major Colorectal Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery protocols are becoming standard practice after major colorectal surgery. An increasing body of evidence suggests that early feeding should be encouraged; however, whether a clear liquid diet or solid diet should be given immediately after surgery is undetermined. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate whether regular diet was superior to clear liquid diet beginning on postoperative day 0 after major colorectal surgery. DESIGN: Superiority trial design. SETTING: Urban tertiary center. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients undergoing abdominal colorectal surgery from September 2017 to June 2018. INTERVENTIONS: Eligible patients received either 1) clear liquid diet on postoperative day 0 with advancement to regular diet on postoperative day 1 or 2) regular diet on postoperative day 0 and continuing for the duration of patients' recovery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was diet tolerance, defined by the absence of vomiting by postoperative day 2. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients were randomly assigned with 53 in the clear liquid diet group and 52 in the regular diet group. All randomly assigned patients were included in the analysis. The rate of diet tolerance by postoperative day 2 was similar between groups. Rates of ileus, antiemetic usage, narcotic usage, time to return of bowel function, and pain/nausea/bloating scores were similar between the 2 groups. Significantly more patients in the clear liquid diet group (91%) tolerated their diet than did the regular diet group (71%) on postoperative day 0 ( p = 0.01). LIMITATIONS: Diet tolerance was only monitored during inpatient stay. The rate of postoperative ileus was difficult to capture as its clinical definition encompassed a wide range of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Regular diet immediately after abdominal colorectal surgery was not superior to a clear liquid diet with respect to diet tolerance by postoperative day 2. Furthermore, starting regular diet on postoperative day 0 was not associated with any outcome benefits compared to clear liquid diet. ENSAYO PROSPECTIVO ALEATORIZADO SOBRE EL USO POSTOPERATORIO INMEDIATO DE UNA DIETA NORMAL VERSUS UNA DIETA DE LQUIDOS CLAROS EN CIRUGAS MAYORES COLORRECTALES: ANTECEDENTES:Los protocolos de recuperación mejorada se están convirtiendo en una práctica estandarizada tras una cirugía mayor colorrectal. La creciente evidencia sugiere la alimentación temprana debe ser estimulada, sin embargo, no se ha determinado si se debe administrar una dieta de líquidos claros o una dieta sólida inmediatamente después de la cirugía.OBJETIVO:Evaluar si la dieta regular fue superior a la dieta de líquidos claros a partir del día cero del postoperatorio tras una cirugía mayor colorrectal.DISEÑO:Diseño de prueba de superioridad.AJUSTE:Centro terciario urbano.PACIENTES:Pacientes consecutivos sometidos a cirugía abdominal colorrectal desde septiembre de 2017 hasta junio de 2018INTERVENCIONES:Los pacientes elegibles recibieron ya sea 1) dieta de líquidos claros en el día 0 del postoperatorio con avance a la dieta regular en el día 1 del postoperatorio o 2) dieta regular en el día 0 del postoperatorio y continuaron durante la recuperación de los pacientes.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El criterio principal de valoración fue la tolerancia a la dieta, definida por la ausencia de vómitos en el segundo día posoperatorio.RESULTADOS:Un total de 105 pacientes fueron aleatorizados con 53 en el grupo de dieta de líquidos claros y 52 en el grupo de dieta regular. Todos los pacientes aleatorizados fueron incluidos en el análisis. La tasa de tolerancia a la dieta en el segundo día postoperatorio fue similar entre los grupos. Las tasas de íleo, del uso de antieméticos, del uso de narcóticos, del tiempo de recuperación de la función intestinal y puntajes de dolor/náuseas/distensión abdominal fueron similares entre los dos grupos. Significativamente más pacientes en el grupo de dieta de líquidos claros (91%) toleraron su dieta comparada al grupo de dieta regular (71%) en el día postoperatorio 0 ( p = 0,01).LIMITACIONES:La tolerancia a la dieta solo fue monitorizada durante la estadía hospitalaria. La tasa de íleo postoperatorio fue difícil de registrar debido a que su definición clínica abarcaba una amplia variedad de síntomas.CONCLUSIONES:La dieta regular inmediatamente después de la cirugía abdominal colorrectal no fue superior a una dieta de líquidos claros con respecto a la tolerancia de la dieta en el día 2 del postoperatorio. Además, comenzar una dieta regular el día cero del postoperatorio no se asoció con ningún beneficio en los resultados en comparación con la dieta de líquidos claros. (Traducción-Dr. Osvaldo Gauto ).

Feasibility of opioid-free surgery for inflammatory bowel disease.

AIM: Patients undergoing colorectal surgery or those with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are particularly at risk for opioid-related complications and progression to long-term opioid dependence. The aim of this work is to explore the real-world possibility of perioperative opioid avoidance in colorectal surgery and IBD. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients aggregated from two prospective studies on multimodal postoperative pain control conducted at a single tertiary referral centre. All patients underwent major colorectal surgery with bowel resection. Patients with chronic preoperative opioid use were excluded. Opioid use was measured in oral morphine equivalents (OME) each postoperative day (POD) and cumulatively for the first 72 h. RESULTS: Our cohort of 209 patients included 148 (71%) with IBD and 61 (29%) non-IBD patients. IBD patients required significantly more opioids cumulatively over the first 72 postoperative hours compared with non-IBD patients [median OME 77 mg (interquartile range 33-148 mg) vs. 4 mg (interquartile range 17-82 mg), respectively; p = 0.001]. Five percent of IBD patients achieved opioid-free postoperative pain control during the entire 72 h postoperative period compared with 12% of non-IBD patients. Only 7% of IBD patients avoided opioid use on POD 1 compared with 20% of non-IBD patients (p = 0.02); however the number of IBD patients increased to 16% on POD 2 then 40% on POD 3, closely resembling the non-IBD cohort at 49% (p = 0.22). CONCLUSION: In the era of modern enhanced recovery protocols and minimally invasive techniques, we show that early postoperative opioid avoidance is feasible in a limited number of IBD patients after colorectal surgery.

Efficacy of Anal Sphincter Division During Fistulotomy in Anal Fissure-Associated Fistula.

BACKGROUND: A subset of chronic anal fissures beget focal infection, leading to concomitant fistula. The optimal management of fissure-associated fistula is unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to characterize healing rates and effects of fistulotomy in fissure-associated fistula. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Urban tertiary center. PATIENTS: Adults who underwent fistulotomy for a fistula associated with a chronic anal fissure were included in the study. However, those with Crohn's disease, a history of lateral internal sphincterotomy, and a fistula not amenable to fistulotomy were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were managed with fistulotomy. Fissures were otherwise managed conservatively with a step-up approach. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was healing, defined as resolution of symptoms and both fistula and fissure wounds within 1 year. Subgroup analysis compared those who underwent subcutaneous fistulotomy (group A) with those who underwent fistulotomy involving anal sphincter fibers (group B). RESULTS: Twenty-four of 38 patients (63%) healed with a median overall follow-up of 6.6 months (4.2-14.1). The overall median time to healing was 4.4 months (2.2-6.0). No clinical or pathologic factors predicted healing. In subgroup analysis, overall subcutaneous fistulotomy healing rates were nonstatically lower at 46% (6/13) compared to fistulotomy involving anal sphincter fibers at 72% (18/25; p = 0.16). There was no difference in time to healing (subcutaneous fistulotomy, 6.7 mo [5.2-8.4] vs fistulotomy involving sphincter, 5.1 mo [2.1-7.0]; p = 0.36). LIMITATIONS: The limitations include treatment bias, with increased utilization of chemical sphincter-relaxing agents in those who did not heal. Findings are not applicable to complex fistulas, Crohn's disease, or atypical fissures. CONCLUSIONS: Patients presenting with chronic fissure and associated subcutaneous, intersphincteric, or low transphincteric fistula are successfully managed with fistulotomy. Patients with a subcutaneous fistula tract exhibited nonstatistically significantly lower rates of healing. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C145 . EFICACIA DE LA DIVISIN ESFINTRICA DURANTE LA FISTULOTOMA EN CASOS DE FSTULA ASOCIADA A FISURA ANAL: ANTECEDENTES: Ciertos subgrupos de fisuras anales crónicas ocasionan infección localizada, induciendo la aparición de una fístula anal concomitante. Se desconoce el manejo óptimo de la fístula concomitante a una fisura anal.OBJETIVO: Se trata de caracterizar las tasas de curación y el efecto de la fistulotomía en el tratamiento de la fístula concomitante a la fisura anal.DISEÑO: Estudio retrospectivo.EMPLAZAMIENTO: Centro terciario urbano.PACIENTES: Adultos sometidos a fistulotomía por una fístula concomitante a una fisura anal crónica. Se excluyeron la enfermedad de Crohn, el antecedente de una esfinterotomía lateral interna y las fístulas no susceptibles de fistulotomía.INTERVENCIONES: Los pacientes fueron manejados con una fistulotomía clasica. Por lo demás, las fisuras se trataron de forma conservadora con un enfoque médico escalonado.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO: El criterio principal de valoración fué la cura definitiva, determinada como la resolución completa de los síntomas y de las heridas tanto de la fístula como de la fisura en el plazo de un año. El análisis de los subgrupos comparó los que se sometieron a una fistulotomía subcutánea (grupo A) versus una fistulotomía que involucró las fibras del esfínter anal interno (grupo B).RESULTADOS: 24/38 pacientes (63%) curaron con una mediana de seguimiento global de 6,6 meses (4,2-14,1). El tiempo medio general de curación fue de 4,4 meses (2,2-6,0). Ningún factor clínico o patológico predijo la cura. En el análisis de subgrupos, las tasas generales de cura de la fistulotomía subcutánea no fueron estadísticamente más bajas de 46 % (6/13) comparados con la fistulotomía que involucró las fibras del esfínter anal interno en 72 % (18/25; p = 0,16). No hubo diferencia en el tiempo de cicatrización [fistulotomía subcutánea 6,7 meses (5,2-8,4) conparada a la fistulotomía y esfínterotomía parcial interna a 5,1 meses (2,1-7,0); p = 0,36].LIMITACIONES: Sesgo del tratamiento, con mayor utilización de agentes químicos relajantes de la musculatura esfínteriana en aquellos pacientes que no sanaron. No aplicable a fístulas complejas, enfermedad de Crohn o fisuras atípicas.CONCLUSIÓNES: Los pacientes que presentan fisura crónica y fístula subcutánea, inter-esfintérica o trans-esfintérica baja concomitante se manejan con éxito con una fistulotomía. Los pacientes con un trayecto de fístula subcutánea exhibieron tasas de curación más bajas y no estadísticamente significativas. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C145 . (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo ).

Preoperative CT Indices Predict Nonreach Before IPAA.

BACKGROUND: IPAA aims to restore continence to patients after total proctocolectomy. However, some patients have inadequate small-bowel mesenteric length to achieve reconstruction. No preoperative risk stratification tools of native anatomy exist. OBJECTIVE: We report CT-guided measurements of anatomic landmarks to predict nonreach before IPAA. DESIGN: This is a single-institution retrospective analysis of a prospective database. SETTING: This study was conducted at Cedars-Sinai between January 2007 and December 2021. PATIENTS: Patients with IBD undergoing a 2- or 3-stage IPAA with a preoperative abdominal CT using either an enterography protocol or IV contrast sufficient to visualize mesenteric vasculature were included in the study. CT mesenteric indices were assessed, including total length (representing length required for the pouch to reach the anal canal), mesenteric length (inherent length of small-bowel mesentery), and mobilization length (the difference between total length and mesenteric length). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was IPAA nonreach. The secondary outcomes were association of clinical variables and CT mesenteric indices. RESULTS: Six of 59 patients (10%) experienced nonreach. Mobilization length was longer in the nonreach group by 5.8 cm ( p = 0.01), and mesenteric length was shorter by 3.5 cm ( p = 0.04). Mobilization length ≥17 cm provided 100% sensitivity and 69% specificity (OR 1.46, area under the curve 0.84, p = 0.004) for nonreach. Similarly, a mesenteric length <14.6 cm demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 49% specificity for IPAA nonreach (area under the curve 0.75, p = 0.03). LIMITATIONS: The retrospective nature of the study precluded a standardized imaging protocol. External validation will be required because of the small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: CT-based measurements of length, specifically mesenteric and mobilization length, predict nonreach before IPAA. This method is noninvasive, readily available, and may be useful for preoperative patient counseling and operative planning. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C140 . LOS NDICES DE TOMOGRAFA COMPUTARIZADA PREOPERATORIA PREDICEN LA AUSENCIA DE ALCANCE ANTES DE LA ANASTOMOSIS DEL RESERVORIO ILEALANAL: ANTECEDENTES:La anastomosis del reservorio ileoanal tiene como objetivo restaurar la continencia en los pacientes después de una proctocolectomía total. Sin embargo, algunos pacientes tienen una longitud mesentérica del intestino delgado inadecuada para lograr la reconstrucción. No existen herramientas de estratificación del riesgo preoperatorio de la anatomía nativa.OBJETIVO:Informamos mediciones guiadas por tomografía computarizada de puntos de referencia anatómicos para predecir la falta de alcance antes de la anastomosis ileoanal con reservorio.DISEÑO:Este es un análisis retrospectivo de una sola institución de una base de datos prospectiva.AJUSTE:Este estudio se realizó en Cedars-Sinai entre Enero de 2007 y Diciembre de 2021.PACIENTES:Pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal que se someten a una anastomosis anal con reservorio ileal en 2 o 3 etapas con una tomografía computarizada abdominal preoperatoria utilizando un protocolo de enterografía o contraste intravenoso suficiente para visualizar la vasculatura mesentérica. Se evaluaron los índices mesentéricos de tomografía computarizada, incluida la longitud total (que representa la longitud requerida para que la bolsa alcance el canal anal), la longitud mesentérica (longitud inherente del mesenterio del intestino delgado) y la longitud de movilización (la diferencia entre la longitud total y la longitud mesentérica).PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado primario fue falta de alcance de la anastomosis del reservorio ileoanal. Los resultados secundarios fueron la asociación de variables clínicas y los índices mesentéricos de tomografía computarizada.RESULTADOS:Seis de 59 (10%) pacientes experimentaron falta de alcance. La longitud de movilización fue mayor en el grupo sin alcance en 5,8 cm ( p = 0,01) y la longitud mesentérica fue menor en 3,5 cm ( p = 0,04). La longitud de movilización ≥17 cm proporcionó una sensibilidad del 100% y una especificidad del 69% (OR 1,46, AUC 0,84, p = 0,004) para la falta de alcance. De manera similar, una longitud mesentérica <14,6 cm demostró una sensibilidad del 100% y una especificidad del 49% para la falta de alcance de la anastomosis del reservorio ileoanal (AUC 0,75, p = 0,03).LIMITACIONES:La naturaleza retrospectiva del estudio impidió un protocolo de imágenes estandarizado. Se requerirá una validación externa debido al pequeño tamaño de la muestra.CONCLUSIONES:Las mediciones de longitud basadas en tomografía computarizada, específicamente la longitud mesentérica y de movilización, predicen la falta de alcance antes de la anastomosis anal con bolsa ileo. Este método no es invasivo, está fácilmente disponible y puede ser útil para el asesoramiento preoperatorio del paciente y la planificación quirúrgica. Consulte el Video Resumen en https://links.lww.com/DCR/C140 . (Traducción-Dr. Yesenia Rojas-Khalil ).

Impact of postoperative telemedicine visit versus in-person visit on patient satisfaction: A randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Although telemedicine use has increased dramatically during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond, the impact of telemedicine versus in-person postoperative visits on patient satisfaction has not been studied prospectively. We hypothesized that telemedicine visits would be noninferior to in-person visits in terms of postoperative colorectal surgery patient satisfaction. METHODS: We conducted a randomized trial of consecutive adult patients undergoing transabdominal colorectal surgery from September 2020 to February 2021. Eligible participants were randomized 1:1 to either receive a telemedicine visit (Arm T) or an in-person visit (Arm I) for their first postoperative appointment. Subsequently, participants in Arm T completed a second postoperative visit in person, and participants in Arm I completed a second postoperative visit via telemedicine. All participants completed a patient satisfaction survey electronically within 24 hours after each postoperative visit. The primary endpoint was total patient satisfaction score. Secondary endpoints included patient-reported safety score, length of visit, and willingness of patients to recommend the practice to their peers. Fisher's exact test, χ2 analysis, and Student's t test were used to compare outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 46 patients were analyzed with 23 each in Arm T and Arm I. The mean age of our study cohort was 50.6 (standard deviation 17.7) years and 52% were female. No significant differences were found between groups in terms of baseline characteristics. With respect to our primary endpoint of total satisfaction score, patient satisfaction scores in Arm T were non-inferior to those in Arm I. Similarly, there was no significant difference in satisfaction scores after the second postoperative visit when the visit types were reversed. We did not find any significant differences between groups in terms of our secondary endpoints. CONCLUSION: Postoperative telemedicine visits were a safe and time-efficient option that maintained high patient satisfaction compared with in-person postoperative visits.

Magnitude of Preoperative C-Reactive Protein Elevation Is Associated With De Novo Crohn's Disease After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in Patients With Severe Colitis.

BACKGROUND: Total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis has become the standard procedure for patients with medically refractory ulcerative colitis, although a subset will develop de novo Crohn's disease. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we investigated the association of preoperative C-reactive protein levels with the development of de novo Crohn's disease after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. DESIGN: A prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis was reviewed. PATIENTS: Preoperative C-reactive protein levels were compared between patients who developed de novo Crohn's disease and those who did not. De novo Crohn's disease was defined as small-bowel inflammation proximal to the ileal pouch or perianal disease identified more than 3 months after ileostomy closure. To minimize the heterogeneity of the timing of preoperative C-reactive protein measurement and the severity of ulcerative colitis, only hospitalized patients who had proctocolectomy for severe ulcerative colitis were included in the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Development of de novo Crohn's disease was analyzed. RESULTS: Of 105 patients, 23 (22%) developed de novo Crohn's disease. Having C-reactive protein in the third tertile significantly increased the risk of developing de novo Crohn's disease (HR 3.44, 95% CI 1.10- 10.70, p = 0.03) compared to in the first tertile. In a multivariable model, a C-reactive protein in the third or second tertile vs the first tertile and younger age was associated with the development of de novo Crohn's disease. LIMITATIONS: Limited to only hospitalized patients with severe ulcerative colitis. CONCLUSIONS: In hospitalized patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for medically refractory ulcerative colitis, higher preoperative C-reactive protein levels appear to increase the risk of developing de novo Crohn's disease. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B750.LA MAGNITUD DE LA ELEVACIÓN PREOPERATORIA DE LA PROTEÍNA C REACTIVA SE ASOCIA CON APARICIÓN DE UNA ENFERMEDAD DE CROHN DE NOVO DESPUÉS DE UNA ANASTOMOSIS DE BOLSA ILEAL AL ANO EN PACIENTES CON COLITIS SEVERAANTECEDENTES:La proctocolectomía total con anastomosis bolsa ileal-anal se ha convertido en el procedimiento estándar para los pacientes con colitis ulcerativa refractaria al tratamiento médico, aunque un subgrupo desarrollará una enfermedad de Crohn de novo.OBJETIVO:En este estudio investigamos la asociación de los niveles de proteína C reactiva preoperatoria con el desarrollo de la enfermedad de Crohn de novo, después de la anastomosis bolsa ileal-anal.DISEÑO:Se revisó una base de datos recolectada en forma prospectiva, de pacientes sometidos a anastomosis bolsa ileal-anal.PACIENTES:Se compararon los niveles de proteína C reactiva preoperatoria entre los pacientes que desarrollaron la enfermedad de Crohn de novo y los que no la desarrollaron. La enfermedad de Crohn de novo se definió como una inflamación del intestino delgado proximal a la bolsa ileal o una enfermedad perianal identificada más de 3 meses después del cierre de la ileostomía. Para minimizar la heterogeneidad del momento de la medición de la proteína C reactiva preoperatoria y la gravedad de la colitis ulcerativa, solo se incluyeron en el estudio los pacientes hospitalizados que se sometieron a una proctocolectomía por colitis ulcerativa grave.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:se analizó el desarrollo de la enfermedad de Crohn de novo.RESULTADOS:De 105 pacientes, 23 (22%) desarrollaron enfermedad de Crohn de novo. Tener una proteína C reactiva en el tercer tercil aumentó significativamente el riesgo de desarrollar la enfermedad de Crohn de novo (HR 3,44, IC del 95%: 1,10-10,70, p = 0,03) en comparación con el primer tercil. En un modelo multivariable, una proteína C reactiva en el tercer o segundo tercil frente al primer tercil y una edad más joven se asoció con el desarrollo de la enfermedad de Crohn de novo.LIMITACIONES:Limitado solo a pacientes hospitalizados con colitis ulcerativa grave.CONCLUSIONES:En pacientes hospitalizados sometidos a anastomosis bolsa ileal-anal por colitis ulcerativa refractaria al tratamiento médico, niveles más elevados de proteína C reactiva preoperatoria parecen aumentar el riesgo de desarrollar enfermedad de Crohn de novo. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B750. (Traducción-Eduardo Londoño-Schimmer).

A Single-Center Experience of Transanal Proctectomy With IPAA for IBD.

BACKGROUND: Restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA is the standard procedure in ulcerative colitis patients with medical refractory disease or dysplasia and select patients with IBD unclassified or Crohn's disease. A variety of minimally invasive techniques have become increasingly utilized, including the transanal IPAA. Unfortunately, despite its growing popularity, there is a lack of high-quality data for the transanal approach. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate clinical outcomes, including complication rates, during our initial experience with the transanal approach. DESIGN: The study design was a single-center prospective case series. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at a tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: The study included patients with ulcerative colitis, IBD unclassified, and Crohn's disease undergoing 2- or 3-stage restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA. INTERVENTIONS: Consecutive patients after November 2016 undergoing restorative proctocolectomy with transanal approach were compared with a historic cohort of patients who underwent an open approach before October 2016. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was early and late anastomotic leak rates during our learning curve. Secondary outcomes included postoperative clinical measures. RESULTS: The study group consisted of 100 open and 65 transanal approach patients. Median (interquartile range) estimated blood loss was lower with the transanal approach (100 [50-150] vs 150 [100-250] mL; p = 0.007), and hospital stay was lower in the transanal group by 2 days ( p < 0.001). There was a significantly higher rate of anastomotic leaks with the transanal approach compared with the open approach (n = 7 [11%] vs n = 2 [2%] respectively; p = 0.03). There were fewer, but statistically insignificant, anastomotic complications in the third tertile, which was later in our learning curve. LIMITATIONS: The study was nonrandomized with consecutive assignment, introducing possible selection and chronology biases. CONCLUSION: Restorative proctocolectomy with the transanal approach was associated with lower blood loss and shorter hospital stay but a significantly higher anastomotic leak rate. The transanal minimally invasive approach for pouch surgery offers some advantages but carries a steep learning curve. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B842 . EXPERIENCIA DE UN SOLO CENTRO DE PROCTECTOMA TRANSANAL CON ANASTOMOSIS ILEOANAL CON RESERVORIO ILEAL PARA ENFERMEDAD INFLAMATORIA INTESTINAL: ANTECEDENTES:La proctocolectomía restaurativa con anastomosis ileoanal con reservorio ileal es el procedimiento estándar en pacientes con colitis ulcerativa con enfermedad médica refractaria o displasia y pacientes seleccionados con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal no clasificada o enfermedad de Crohn. Se ha utilizado cada vez más una variedad de técnicas mínimamente invasivas, incluido el enfoque de anastomosis ileoanal con reservorio ileal transanal. Desafortunadamente, a pesar de su creciente popularidad, hay falta de datos de alta calidad para el enfoque transanal.OBJETIVO:Investigar los resultados clínicos, incluidas las tasas de complicaciones, durante nuestra experiencia inicial con el enfoque transanal.DISEÑO:Serie de casos prospectivos de un solo centro.AJUSTES:Centro de referencia terciario.PACIENTES:Pacientes con ulcerativa, enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal no clasificada y enfermedad de Crohn sometidos a proctocolectomía restaurativa de 2 o 3 etapas con anastomosis ileoanal con reservorio ileal.INTERVENCIONES:Pacientes consecutivos después de noviembre del 2016 sometidos a proctocolectomía restaurativa con abordaje transanal fueron comparados con una cohorte histórica que se sometieron a un abordaje abierto antes de octubre del 2016.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:La principal medida de resultado fueron las tasas de fuga anastomótica temprana y tardía durante nuestra curva de aprendizaje. Los resultados secundarios incluyeron medidas clínicas postoperatorias.RESULTADOS:El grupo de estudio estuvo formado por 100 pacientes con abordaje abierto y 65 por vía transanal. La media de pérdida sanguínea estimada fue menor con el abordaje transanal (100 [50-150] vs 150 [100-250] mL; p = 0.007) y la estancia hospitalaria fue menor en el grupo transanal por 2 días ( p < 0.001). Hubo una tasa significativamente mayor de fugas anastomóticas con el abordaje transanal en comparación con el abordaje abierto (n = 7 [11%] vs n = 2 [2%] respectivamente, p = 0.03). Hubo menos complicaciones anastomóticas, pero estadísticamente insignificantes, en el tercer tercil, posterior en nuestra curva de aprendizaje.LIMITACIONES:Estudio no randomizado con asignación consecutiva que presenta posibles sesgos de selección y cronología.CONCLUSIÓNES:La proctocolectomía restaurativa con abordaje transanal se asoció a una menor pérdida sanguínea y estancia hospitalaria más corta, pero con una tasa de fuga anastomótica significativamente mayor. El abordaje transanal mínimamente invasivo para cirugía de reservorio ofrece algunas ventajas, pero conlleva a una curva de aprendizaje pronunciada. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B842 . (Traducción- Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon ).

A Prospective Randomized Trial of Surgeon-Administered Intraoperative Transversus Abdominis Plane Block With Bupivacaine Against Liposomal Bupivacaine: The TINGLE Trial.

BACKGROUND: Transversus abdominis plane blocks are increasingly used to achieve opioid-sparing analgesia after colorectal surgery. Traditionally, bupivacaine was the long-acting analgesic of choice, but the addition of dexamethasone and/or epinephrine to bupivacaine may extend block duration. Liposomal bupivacaine has also been suggested to achieve an extended analgesia duration of 72 hours but is significantly more expensive. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare pain control between laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane blocks using liposomal bupivacaine versus bupivacaine with epinephrine and dexamethasone. DESIGN: This was a parallel-group, single-institution, randomized clinical trial. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at a single tertiary medical center. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients between October 2018 to October 2019, ages 18 to 90 years, undergoing minimally invasive colorectal surgery with multimodal analgesia were included. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive a laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane block with liposomal bupivacaine or bupivacaine with epinephrine and dexamethasone. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was total oral morphine equivalents administered in the first 48 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, time to ambulation and solid diet, hospital length of stay, and complications. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients (50 men) with a median age of 42 years (interquartile range, 29-60 y) consented and were randomly assigned. The primary end point, total oral morphine equivalents administered in the first 48 hours, was not significantly different between the liposomal bupivacaine group (median = 69 mg) and the bupivacaine with epinephrine and dexamethasone group (median = 47 mg; difference in medians = 22 mg, (95% CI, -17 to 49 mg); p = 0.60). There were no significant differences in pain scores, time to ambulation, time to diet tolerance, time to bowel movement, length of stay, overall complications, or readmission rate between groups. There were no treatment-related adverse outcomes. LIMITATIONS: This study was not placebo controlled or blinded. CONCLUSIONS: This first randomized trial comparing laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane block with liposomal bupivacaine or bupivacaine with epinephrine and dexamethasone showed that a liposomal bupivacaine block does not provide superior or extended analgesia in the era of standardized multimodal analgesia protocols.See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B533. ESTUDIO PROSPECTIVO Y RANDOMIZADO DE BLOQUEO DEL PLANO MUSCULAR TRANSVERSO DEL ABDOMEN REALIZADO POR EL CIRUJANO CON BUPIVACANA VERSUS BUPIVACANA LIPOSOMAL ESTUDIO TINGLE: ANTECEDENTES:El bloqueo anestésico del plano muscular transverso del abdomen se utiliza cada vez más para lograr una analgesia con menos consumo de opioides después de cirugía colorrectal. Tradicionalmente, la Bupivacaína era el analgésico de acción prolongada de elección, pero al agregarse Dexametasona y/o Adrenalina a la Bupivacaína se puede prolongar la duración del bloqueo. También se ha propuesto que la Bupivacaína liposomal logra una duración prolongada de la analgesia de 72 horas, pero es significativamente más cara.OBJETIVO:Comparar el control del dolor entre bloqueo laparoscópico del plano de los transversos del abdomen usando Bupivacaína liposomal versus Bupivacaína con Adrenalina y Dexametasona.DISEÑO:Estudio clínico prospectivo y randomizado de una sola institución en grupos paralelos.AJUSTE:Centro médico terciario único.PACIENTES:Todos aquellos pacientes entre 18 y 90 años sometidos a cirugía colorrectal mínimamente invasiva con analgesia multimodal, entre octubre de 2018 a octubre de 2019 incluidos de manera consecutiva.INTERVENCIONES:Los pacientes fueron seleccionados aleatoriamente 1:1 para recibir un bloqueo laparoscópico del plano de los transversos del abdomen con Bupivacaína liposomal o Bupivacaína con Adrenalina y Dexametasona.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado primario fue el total de equivalentes de morfina oral administradas en las primeras 48 horas después de la operación. Los resultados secundarios incluyeron puntuaciones de dolor, inicio de dieta sólida, tiempo de inicio a la deambulación, la estadía hospitalaria y las complicaciones.RESULTADOS:Un total de 102 pacientes (50 hombres) con una mediana de edad de 42 años (IQR 29-60) fueron incluidos aleatoriamente. El criterio de valoración principal, equivalentes de morfina oral total administrada en las primeras 48 horas, no fue significativamente diferente entre el grupo de Bupivacaína liposomal (mediana = 69 mg) y el grupo de Bupivacaína con Adrenalina y Dexametasona (mediana = 47 mg; diferencia en medianas = 22 mg, IC del 95% [-17] - 49 mg, p = 0,60). No hubo diferencias significativas en las puntuaciones de dolor, tiempo de inicio a la deambulación, el tiempo de tolerancia a la dieta sólida, el tiempo hasta el primer evacuado intestinal, la duración de la estadía hospitalaria, las complicaciones generales o la tasa de readmisión entre los grupos. No hubo resultados adversos relacionados con el tratamiento.LIMITACIONES:Este estudio no fue controlado con placebo ni de manera cegada.CONCLUSIONES:Este primer estudio prospectivo y randomizado que comparó el bloqueo del plano de los músculos transversos del abdomen por vía laparoscópica, utilizando Bupivacaína liposomal o Bupivacaína con Adrenalina y Dexametasona, demostró que el bloqueo de Bupivacaína liposomal no proporciona ni mejor analgesia ni un efecto mas prolongado.Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B533.

Transanal Ileal Pouch: Is It Better?

Background: Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the procedure of choice for patients with ulcerative colitis and select patients with Crohn's disease. Minimally invasive techniques have been increasingly adopted including the transanal approach. However there remains a dearth of comparative data assessing the technical advantages and outcomes of a transanal approach to the IPAA against other minimally invasive techniques. Methods: In this review, we describe our learned approach with the transanal IPAA (ta-IPAA) and highlight key technical steps for a successful surgery in addition to evaluating the current literature on surgical and functional outcomes of this relatively novel procedure. Results: The ta-IPAA affords better visualization and access during a pelvic dissection translating to lower conversion rates. Lower odds of postoperative morbidity have been reported, but there was no difference in severity of complications when present. Though this technique has the advantages of a more accurate rectal transection obviating the need for multiple staple firings, the risk of anastomotic leak was similar between the two groups. Functional outcomes were found to be overall similar, though data is limited. Conclusions: The technical aspects of the IPAA have continued to evolve to mitigate the challenges posed by a deep pelvic dissection. While the ta-IPAA has been shown to be a safe and feasible procedure, the true advantages and functional benefits of this technique have yet to be elucidated with large-scale, quality data.

Antitumour necrosis factor therapy is associated with de novo Crohn's disease after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

AIM: Tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) have revolutionized the management of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) since their approval for UC in 2005. However, many patients ultimately require surgery with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). Development of de novo Crohn's disease (CD) following IPAA is an increasingly common and devastating complication, sometimes progressing to pouch failure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of preoperative TNFi exposure and the development of de novo CD after IPAA. METHOD: A prospective single-centre inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) registry was searched for consecutive patients with UC undergoing IPAA during a 25-year period ending July 2018. Patients with preoperative CD or IBD-unclassified were excluded. De novo CD was diagnosed upon endoscopic evidence of five or more mucosal ulcers proximal to the ileal pouch any time after surgery and/or pouch fistula occurring more than three months after ileostomy closure. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 400 patients with a median follow-up of 44.0 (IQR 11-113) months. Sixty-two (16%) patients developed de novo CD 28.0 (IQR 6-67) months following ileostomy closure. Survival analysis of TNFi era patients revealed a significant increase in de novo CD risk in those with preoperative TNFi exposure. Multivariable proportional hazards modelling revealed two independent predictors for de novo CD development: older age was protective (HR 0.89 per 5-year increase; P = 0.009) and preoperative TNFi exposure was hazardous (HR 2.10; P = 0.011). CONCLUSION: This prospective study is the first to suggest an association between preoperative TNFi exposure and the development of de novo CD.

Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Versus Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Transversus abdominis plane block may improve analgesia after colorectal surgery; however, techniques remain unstandardized and results are conflicting. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare laparoscopic and ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block with no block in minimally invasive colorectal surgery. DESIGN: This was a randomized controlled trial. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at an urban teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery were included. INTERVENTIONS: The intervention included 2:2:1 randomization to laparoscopic, ultrasound-guided, or no transversus abdominis plane block. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Morphine use in the first 24 hours after surgery was measured. RESULTS: The study cohort included 107 patients randomly assigned to laparoscopic (n = 41), ultrasound-guided (n = 45), or no transversus abdominis plane block (n = 21). Mean age was 50.4 years (SD ± 18 y), and 50 patients (47%) were men. Laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane block was superior to ultrasound-guided (p = 0.007) and no transversus abdominis plane block (p = 0.007), with median (interquartile range) total morphine used in the first 24 hours postoperatively of 17.6 mg (6.6-33.9 mg), 34.0 mg (16.4-44.4 mg), and 31.6 mg (18.4-44.4 mg). At 48 hours, laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane block remained superior to ultrasound-guided (p = 0.03) and no transversus abdominis plane block (p = 0.007) with median (interquartile range) total morphine used at 48 hours postoperatively of 26.8 mg (15.5-45.8 mg), 44.0 mg (27.6-70.0 mg), and 60.8 mg (34.8-78.8 mg). Mean hospital stay was 5.1 ± 3.1 days without any intergroup differences. Overall complications were similar between groups. LIMITATIONS: Treatment teams were not blinded and there was operator dependence of techniques and variable timing of the blocks. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane block is superior to ultrasound-guided and no transversus abdominis plane block in achieving pain control and minimizing opioid use in the first 24 hours after colorectal surgery. A large, multicenter, randomized trial is needed to confirm our findings. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A822.

Timing of Chemical Thromboprophylaxis and Deep Vein Thrombosis in Major Colorectal Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the optimal timing of perioperative chemical thromboprophylaxis (CTP) and incidence of occult preoperative deep vein thrombosis (OP-DVT) in patients undergoing major colorectal surgery. BACKGROUND: There is limited Level 1 data regarding the optimal timing of CTP in major colorectal surgery and the incidence of OP-DVT remains unclear. Both issues influence the occurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and may impact Medicare reimbursement because of penalties for hospital-acquired conditions. METHODS: Patients undergoing major colorectal surgery underwent preoperative lower extremity venous duplex (LEVD) immediately before surgery. Those without OP-DVT were randomized to preoperative or postoperative CTP with 5000 units of subcutaneous heparin. Patients underwent repeat LEVD in the recovery room and on postoperative day 2. Outcome measures included early (48-hrs) and overall (30-days) postoperative VTE, bleeding complications, and OP-DVT. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (4.2%) had OP-DVT and were excluded. The randomized group included 376 patients (51.6% female) with mean age of 52.7 ±â€Š17.6 years. No pulmonary embolism occurred. There was no significant difference in preoperative versus postoperative CTP with respect to early postoperative DVT [3/184 (1.6%) vs 5/192 (2.6%); P = 0.72], DVT at 30 days (1.6% vs 3.6%; P = 0.34) or bleeding complications requiring reoperation (0.5% vs 1.6%; P = 0.62). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of OP-DVT is higher than that of perioperative DVT after colorectal surgery and preoperative screening LEVD should be considered to identify and treat patients at risk for pulmonary embolism. Preoperative and postoperative CTP are equally safe in protecting against VTE. CMS should account for these factors when assigning financial disincentives for perioperative VTE. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov #NCT01976988.

Clinical Factors Associated with the Development of Crohn's Disease in Inflammatory Bowel Disease-unclassified Patients Undergoing Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomosis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease-unclassified (IBDU) undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) are at the risk of developing Crohn's disease (CD) after surgical procedure. In these patients, a clinically centered set of preoperative risk factors has not been prospectively defined. We report a single-center analysis of clinical factors associated with the development of CD after IPAA. METHODS: Consecutive IBDU patients undergoing IPAA were identified. The diagnosis of IBDU was based on the presence of atypical disease distribution, presence of granulomas on endoscopic biopsy, and/or perianal disease. The diagnosis of CD after IPAA included the presence of afferent limb inflammation on pouchoscopy in the absence of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and/or the development of pouch fistulizing disease more than 3 months after ileostomy closure. RESULTS: Of the 149 study patients, 33 (22%) were diagnosed with CD after IPAA at a median of 37 months (interquartile range, 11-83 mo) after ileostomy closure. CD was diagnosed by mucosal inflammation above the pouch (n = 23; 70%), pouch fistulizing disease (n = 4; 12%), anorectal septic complications (n = 2; 6%), or the presence of ≥2 of the above complications (n = 4; 12%). The sole clinical predictor for the development of CD after IPAA was younger age at disease onset even after controlling for relevant clinical factors in a multivariate analysis. The odds of developing CD increased by 4% for each year that IBDU was diagnosed at a younger age. CONCLUSIONS: Younger age at disease onset is the only clinical factor associated with the development of CD after IPAA for IBDU. Patients with IBDU undergoing IPAA with young age at disease onset should be counseled about the potentially higher risk of developing CD.

High-dose perioperative corticosteroids in steroid-treated patients undergoing major colorectal surgery: necessary or overkill?

BACKGROUND: Steroid-treated patients undergoing major colorectal surgery are routinely treated with high-dose steroids (HDS) to prevent perioperative adrenal insufficiency and cardiovascular collapse. However, there is no evidence to support this practice. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 97 consecutive steroid-treated patients with inflammatory bowel disease who underwent major colorectal surgery was performed. The incidence of hemodynamic instability and surgical outcomes were compared in patients treated with perioperative low-dose steroids (LDS) versus HDS. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were treated with HDS, and 54 patients received LDS. There was no significant difference in hemodynamic instability between HDS-treated (74%) and LDS-treated (78%) patients. No patients required rescue HDS for adrenal insufficiency. CONCLUSIONS: Steroid-treated patients with inflammatory bowel disease undergoing major colorectal surgery appear to have no clinically significant hemodynamic instability when managed with LDS versus HDS. A prospective study assessing perioperative steroid dosing in patients with inflammatory bowel disease is in progress.

Scarless single-incision laparoscopic loop ileostomy: a novel technique.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery has become a favorable alternative to conventional open surgery for the creation of intestinal stomas, and it offers many benefits including reduced postoperative pain, ileus, and hospital stay. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery has been described for many abdominal operations. It may offer better cosmetic outcomes and reduce incisional pain, adhesions, and recovery time. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to describe a novel technique of scarless single-incision laparoscopic loop ileostomy for fecal diversion and to report our experience with 8 patients who underwent this procedure within a 1-year period. DESIGN: This study was designed as a retrospective case series. SETTINGS: This investigation was conducted at a single-institution, tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Eight consecutive patients undergoing scarless single-incision laparoscopic loop ileostomy between August 2009 and August 2010 were included. INTERVENTION: Scarless single-incision laparoscopic loop ileostomies were performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Among the outcomes measured were operation time, intraoperative blood loss, recovery of intestinal function, length of hospital stay, and surgical complications. RESULTS: Seven patients underwent surgery for active Crohn's disease refractory to medical therapy. One patient underwent surgery for radiation-induced rectovesical fistula. Median surgery time was 76 minutes, and median intraoperative blood loss was 10 mL. Median length of postoperative hospitalization was 7 days. Of the 8 patients included in our series, 2 patients (25%) required reoperation for stoma ischemia because of vascular congestion that we attribute to a tight fascial opening or extensive bowel manipulation. Other surgical complications included nonoperative readmission for ileus and partial small-bowel obstruction (n = 2), anal dilation to evacuate an obstructed distal colon (n = 1), and peristomal cellulitis (n = 1). LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its small sample size and its retrospective nature. CONCLUSION: Scarless single-incision laparoscopic loop ileostomy is a feasible alternative to standard laparoscopy for fecal diversion. Surgeons attempting this technique should do so with caution, given the high stoma ischemia rate in our small case series.