ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: We aimed to consolidate our clinical observations regarding the development of pulmonary hypertension following pneumonectomy for lung cancer. METHODS: Sixty-nine of 82 initially selected patients without pulmonary or cardiac comorbidities, who underwent pneumonectomy for lung cancer between October 2009 and October 2011, accomplished our protocol. Mean patient age was 60.6 years (range 44-78 years) and 10.1% were women. RESULTS: Postoperative complications occurred in 16 (23.2%) patients. Mortality at 1, 12, and 18 months postoperatively was 4.3%, 15.9%, and 29%, respectively. One year postoperatively, 37.9% of patients developed mild to moderate pulmonary hypertension and 3.4% had severe pulmonary hypertension. The calculated mean pulmonary artery systolic pressure at 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively was 21.9 ± 6.6, 27.3 ± 9.3, and 34.1 ± 14 mm Hg, respectively (p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed a cutoff point at 35.5 mm Hg for late postoperative (at 12 months) pulmonary artery systolic pressure (sensitivity 80%, specificity 82%; p < 0.001) related to suboptimal clinical outcomes (decreased performance status or death), with a detected 18-fold risk for these patients (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary hypertension may occur after pneumonectomy with its known adverse effects. Patients with late postoperative pulmonary artery systolic pressure > 35.5 mm Hg are at higher risk of a suboptimal clinical outcome.
Subject(s)
Hypertension, Pulmonary/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Pneumonectomy/methods , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Lung/surgery , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , ROC Curve , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To explore whether or not statins have any impact on the progression of components of benign prostatic hyperplasia (lower urinary tract symptoms severity, prostate volume and serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) when combined with other agents inhibiting growth of prostate cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a preliminary, clinical study. Eligible patients were aged > 50 yrs, with International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) between 9 and 19, total prostate volume (TPV) >40 mL, and serum PSA > 1.5 ng/mL. Patients were divided in two groups: those with and those without lipidemia. After selection, eligible BPH patients with lipidemia (n = 18) were prescribed lovastatin 80 mg daily and finasteride 5 mg daily, while eligible patients without lipidemia (n = 15) were prescribed only finasteride 5 mg daily. IPSS, TPV and serum PSA were evaluated at end point (4 months). RESULTS: There was no difference between the two groups on the primary end point of mean change from baseline in IPSS (p = 0.69), TPV (p = 0.90) and PSA (p = 0.16) after 4 months of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term lovastatin treatment does not seem to have any effect on IPSS, TPV and PSA in men with prostatic enlargement due to presumed BPH.
Subject(s)
Anticholesteremic Agents/administration & dosage , Enzyme Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Finasteride/administration & dosage , Lovastatin/administration & dosage , Prostatic Hyperplasia/drug therapy , Aged , Disease Progression , Drug Interactions , Drug Therapy, Combination , Humans , Hyperlipidemias/complications , Hyperlipidemias/drug therapy , Male , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatic Hyperplasia/blood , Prostatic Hyperplasia/complications , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To explore whether or not statins have any impact on the progression of components of benign prostatic hyperplasia (lower urinary tract symptoms severity, prostate volume and serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) when combined with other agents inhibiting growth of prostate cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a preliminary, clinical study. Eligible patients were aged > 50 yrs, with International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) between 9 and 19, total prostate volume (TPV) > 40 mL, and serum PSA > 1.5 ng/mL. Patients were divided in two groups: those with and those without lipidemia. After selection, eligible BPH patients with lipidemia (n = 18) were prescribed lovastatin 80 mg daily and finasteride 5 mg daily, while eligible patients without lipidemia (n = 15) were prescribed only finasteride 5 mg daily. IPSS, TPV and serum PSA were evaluated at end point (4 months). RESULTS: There was no difference between the two groups on the primary end point of mean change from baseline in IPSS (p = 0.69), TPV (p = 0.90) and PSA (p = 0.16) after 4 months of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term lovastatin treatment does not seem to have any effect on IPSS, TPV and PSA in men with prostatic enlargement due to presumed BPH.
