Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Minerva Stomatol ; 58(11-12): 577-84, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20027128

ABSTRACT

AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the polymerization contraction stress of composites photoactivated by two light sources: quartz tungsten halogen light (QTH) and light emitting diode (LED). METHODS: Glass rods were fabricated (5.0 mm X 5.0 cm) and one of the surfaces was air abraded with aluminum oxide. An adhesive was applied to this surface and photoactivated by LED. The glass rods were assembled to a Universal Testing machine (Instron - 5565) and the composite were applied to the lower rod using a manual instrument. The upper rod was placed closer, at 2 mm, and an extensometer was attached to the rods. The twenty composites were polymerized by either by QTH (N.=10) or LED (N.=10). Polymerization was carried out using two apparatuses positioned in opposite sides, which were simultaneously activated for 30 seconds. Contraction stress was analyzed twice: shortly after polymerization (t30s) and 30 minutes later (t30min). RESULTS: The contraction stress for all composites was higher at t30min than at t30s, regardless of the activation source. Z100 showed lower contraction stress values (P<0.05) compared to the other composites. Regarding to Charisma and TPH, the photoactivation source had no influence on contraction stress, except for Z100 at t30min. CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that composite composition is the factor that most influence the polymerization contraction stress.


Subject(s)
Composite Resins/radiation effects , Curing Lights, Dental , Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives/methods , Light , Resin Cements/radiation effects , Silicon Dioxide/radiation effects , Zirconium/radiation effects , In Vitro Techniques , Materials Testing , Photochemical Processes , Stress, Mechanical
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...