Knowledge, attitudes and adherence towards influenza and other vaccinations among healthcare workers at the University Hospital of Palermo, Italy, during the first COVID-19 pandemic season (2020/2021).

Background: Increasing adherence to influenza vaccination among healthcare workers is a public health priority, stated that actually remains far below than international recommendations. During the 2020/2021 pandemic season, COVID-19 vaccines were not yet available until the end of December 2020, and influenza vaccines were the only one available to protect against seasonal respiratory diseases. The main objective of the present study was to assess knowledge, attitudes and adherence to influenza and other vaccinations recommended by the National Immunization Plan 2017-2021 for healthcare workers. Methods: Enrollment lasted from October and December 2020 at the vaccination unit of the University Hospital of Palermo. Data were collected through an anonymous and self-administered questionnaire, divided into 5 sections and 31 items. Results: Among 734 healthcare professionals that completed the survey, a significantly higher adherence to influenza vaccination was observed among healthcare workers that were more prone to receive COVID-19 vaccination (OR=4.02; 95% CI: 1.63-9.91). Moreover, higher influenza vaccination rates were observed among healthcare professionals that received influenza vaccination during previous 2019/2020 season (OR=15.3; 95% CI: 5.17-45.1) and that were favorable to the possible impact on increasing adherence of influenza mandatory vaccination (OR=4.88; 95% CI: 2.43-9.80). Conclusions: Propensity of healthcare workers to undergo vaccinations recommended in the National Immunization Plan increased during the first pandemic season. At the end of the vaccination season, flu vaccination coverage reached highest rates ever at the University Hospital of Palermo (around 60%), remaining anyway below the recommended minimum value of 75%. During next seasonal flu vaccination campaigns, it becomes essential to promote communication and information strategies to increase flu vaccination among healthcare workers, also focusing on co-administration with the anti-COVID-19 booster/seasonal doses.

[Partial or full component exchange in hip revision? : The relevance of off-label use and mix & match]. / Partieller oder vollständiger Wechsel in der Hüftrevisionsendoprothetik? : Bedeutung von Off-Label-Anwendung und Mix & Match.

Off-label use is frequently practiced in hip revision arthroplasty, as there may be indications for the application of implants for purposes outside the one the manufacturers intended (i.e. large bone and soft tissue defects, obesity). Patients may also benefit from selective application of mix & match in hip revision, when the exchange of one component only is necessary and the invasiveness of surgery can be reduced. Currently, there are no formal guidelines for these situations. Therefore, within a recent EFORT initiative, evidence- and consensus-based recommendations have been developed for the safe application of off-label use and mix & match in revision hip and knee arthroplasty.

Resuming elective hip and knee arthroplasty after the first phase of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: the European Hip Society and European Knee Associates recommendations.

PURPOSE: The Covid-19 pandemic has disrupted health care systems all over the world. Elective surgical procedures have been postponed and/or cancelled. Consensus is, therefore, required related to the factors that need to be in place before elective surgery, including hip and knee replacement surgery, which is restarted. Entirely new pathways and protocols need to be worked out. METHODS: A panel of experts from the European Hip Society and European Knee Association have agreed to a consensus statement on how to reintroduce elective arthroplasty surgery safely. The recommendations are based on the best available evidence and have been validated in a separate survey. RESULTS: The guidelines are based on five themes: modification and/or reorganisation of hospital wards. Restrictions on orthopaedic wards and in operation suite(s). Additional disinfection of the environment. The role of ultra-clean operation theatres. Personal protective equipment enhancement. CONCLUSION: Apart from the following national and local guidance, protocols need to be put in place in the patient pathway for primary arthroplasty to allow for a safe return.

Recommendations for resuming elective hip and knee arthroplasty in the setting of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: the European Hip Society and European Knee Associates Survey of Members.

PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the health care system around the entire globe. A consensus is needed about resuming total hip and knee procedures. The European Hip Society (EHS) and the European Knee Association (EKA) formed a panel of experts that have produced a consensus statement on how the safe re-introduction of elective hip and knee arthroplasty should be undertaken. METHODS: A prospective online survey was done among members of EHS and EKA. The survey consisted of 27 questions. It includes basic information on demographics and details the participant's agreement with each recommendation. The participant could choose among three options (agree, disagree, abstain). Recommendations focussed on pre-operative, peri-operative, and post-operative handling of patients and precautions. RESULTS: A total of 681 arthroplasty surgeons participated in the survey, with 479 fully completing the survey. The participants were from 44 countries and 6 continents. Apart from adhering to National and Local Guidelines, the recommendations concerned how to make elective arthroplasty safe for patients and staff. CONCLUSION: The survey has shown good-to-excellent agreement of the participants with regards to the statements made in the recommendations for the safe return to elective arthroplasty following the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Disruption of joint arthroplasty services in Europe during the COVID-19 pandemic: an online survey within the European Hip Society (EHS) and the European Knee Associates (EKA).

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on joint arthroplasty service in Europe by conducting an online survey of arthroplasty surgeons. METHODS: The survey was conducted in the European Hip Society (EHS) and the European Knee Associates (EKA). The survey consisted of 20 questions (single, multiple choice, ranked). Four topics were addressed: (1) origin and surgical experience of the participant (four questions); (2) potential disruption of arthroplasty surgeries (12 questions); (3) influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the particular arthroplasty surgeon (four questions); (4) a matrix provided 14 different arthroplasty surgeries and the participant was asked to state whether dedicated surgery was stopped, delayed or cancelled. RESULTS: Two-hundred and seventy-two surgeons (217 EHS, 55 EKA) from 40 different countries participated. Of the respondents, 25.7% stated that all surgeries were cancelled in their departments, while 68.4% responded that elective inpatient procedures were no longer being performed. With regard to the specific surgical procedures, nearly all primary TJA were cancelled (92.6%) as well as aseptic revisions (94.7%). In most hospitals, periprosthetic fractures (87.2%), hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures and septic revisions for acute infections (75.8%) were still being performed. CONCLUSION: During the current 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, we are experiencing a near-total shutdown of TJA. A massive cutback was observed for primary TJA and revision TJA, even in massively failed TJA with collapse, dislocation, component failure or imminent dislocation. Only life-threatening pathologies like periprosthetic fractures and acute septic TJA are currently undergoing surgical treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.

Modular implant design affects metal ion release following metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study on 75 cases.

Metal-on-Metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been associated to wear and metal-ions release, controversially related to a variety of clinical complications. Little is known about the relevant design-dependent parameters involved in this process. The present study investigated the correlation between metal ion release in blood and revision rate as a function of: (i) specific MoM implant modular design parameters, (i.e. acetabular cup and femoral head diameters, taper adapter material and size, femoral neck material and modularity and stem size); (ii) MoM bilaterality. Co and Cr ions concentration levels in blood of 75 patients were retrospectively-evaluated with a mean follow-up of 4.8 years (range: 1.8-6.3). Patients were divided in a unilateral and a bilateral group. Statistical analysis was performed to find any significant difference related to acetabular cup diameter, femoral head diameter, taper adapter material/size, neck material/size and stem size. The bilateral MoM group had 4-times higher metal ion levels in blood than the unilateral one (p=0.017 only Cr), related to a higher revision rate (30% vs 20%): differences were 10-times higher particularly with a 48 mm femoral head diameter (p=0.012) and a Ti-alloy neck (p=0.041). Within the monolateral group using a shorter taper adapter and a shorter neutrally-oriented neck demonstrated higher ion levels (p=0.038 only Cr and p=0.008 only Co, respectively). The aforementioned design-features and MoM bilaterality are important risk-factors for metal-ion release in modular MoM THA.

Can leucocyte esterase replace frozen sections in the intraoperative diagnosis of prosthetic hip infection?

AIMS: Leucocyte esterase (LE) has been shown to be an accurate marker of prosthetic joint infection (PJI), and has been proposed as an alternative to frozen section (FS) histology for intraoperative diagnosis. In this study, the intraoperative assessment of LE was compared with FS histology for the diagnosis of prosthetic hip infection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 119 patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) between June 2015 and December 2017 were included in the study. There were 56 men and 63 women with a mean age of 66.2 years (27 to 88). Synovial fluid was collected before arthrotomy for the assessment of LE using enzymatic colourimetric strips. Between five and six samples were stained with haematoxylin and eosin for FS histology, and considered suggestive of infection when at least five polymorphonuclear leucocytes were found in five high-power fields. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of the LE assay were 100% and 93.8%, respectively; the positive (PPV) and the negative (NPV) predictive values were 79.3% and 100%, respectively. The mean time between the collection of the sample and the result being known was 20.1 minutes (sd 4.4). The sensitivity and specificity of FS histology were 78.3% and 96.9%, respectively; the PPV and the NPV were 85.7% and 94.9%, respectively. The mean time between the collection of the sample and the result being known was 27.2 minutes (sd 6.9). CONCLUSION: The sensitivity of LE assay was higher, with similar specificity and diagnostic accuracy, compared with FS histology. The faster turnaround time, its ease of use, and low costs make LE assay a valuable alternative to FS histology. We now use it routinely for the intraoperative diagnosis of PJI. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:372-377.

Total hip arthroplasty in rapidly progressive osteoarthritis of the hip: clinical and radiological outcome of a consecutive series of patients.

Rapidly progressive osteoarthritis (RPOA) is an uncommon subset of osteoarthritis (OA) characterized by rapid joint degeneration and destruction. The treatment of choice for these patients has traditionally been total hip arthroplasty (THA) because nonoperative treatments modalities are not effective. RPOA can lead to acetabular bone loss and consequently intraoperative technical difficulties making joint reconstruction in such patients a challenge for the surgeon. The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical and radiological results of patients suffering from RPOA and treated with hybrid or cementless THA at a single institution. We retrospectively review of all patients who underwent THA for RPOA from January 2011 to December 2016. Twenty-three hips in twenty-one patients were included in this study, with a mean age at surgery of 74 years (range, 41-82) and a mean follow-up of 30 months (range, 24-60). In all patients an uncemented cup, either plasma-spray or trabecular titanium, was implanted. In eighteen cases a cemented femoral stem was used. In eight cases autologous bone graft was used to replace the acetabular defect. Radiographic and clinical follow-up was performed at six months postoperatively, twelve months and yearly thereafter. At radiographic follow-up, no signs of prosthetic loosening or migration were seen. Harris Hip Score improved from 65.3 preoperatively to 89.2 at latest follow-up. The use of both hybrid and uncemented THA in the treatment of RPOA was found to be successful in our patients with a mean 30 months follow-up. Hemispherical cementless cups with both plasma spray and high porosity outer surface (used in the worse cases) were effective in getting primary stability and bone ingrowth.

Revision of ceramic fracture with ceramic-on-polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty: Medium-term results.

There is no consensus on the bearing of choice in revision for ceramic fracture after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes using ceramic-on-polyethylene (CoP) articulation in revision for ceramic breakage. Twelve patients who underwent revision hip surgery between 2002 and 2013 were followed-up. Appropriate surgical technique, including accurate synoviectomy, was used. The cup and the head were changed in four patients and only the liner and the head were replaced in the remaining eight patients. At the final follow-up there were no cases of re-revision due to tribological reasons, and only one case of polyethylene (PE) wear and osteolysis was scheduled for a new revision because of clear cup malposition. Complications were four cases of dislocation, one case of loosening and one case of infection. Revision of fractured ceramic is a challenging situation with a high risk of early complications. Using CoP liners with accurate synoviectomy and correction of misalignment can be considered a valuable bearing option at medium-term follow-up.

Stability of housekeeping genes in human intervertebral disc, endplate and articular cartilage cells in multiple conditions for reliable transcriptional analysis.

Quantitative gene expression analysis is widely used to evaluate the expression of specific tissue markers. To obtain reliable data it is essential to select stable housekeeping genes whose expression is not influenced by the anatomical origin of cells or by the culture conditions. No studies have evaluated housekeeping gene stability in intervertebral disc (IVD) cells and only few studies using cartilaginous endplate (CEP) and articular cartilage (AC) cells are present in the literature. We analysed the stability of four candidate housekeeping genes (GAPDH, TBP, YWHAZ and RPL13A) in human cells isolated from nucleus pulposus (NP) and annulus fibrosus (AF), CEP and AC. Cell isolation, expansion, cryoconservation, and differentiation in 3D pellets were tested. GeNorm, NormFinder, BestKeeper tools and the comparative ΔCt method were used to evaluate housekeeping gene stability. In each cell population, TBP alone or combined with YWHAZ was identified as the best normaliser in both monolayer and 3D pellets. GAPDH was the best performer only for AC cells in monolayer. In most culture conditions considering groups of two or more cell types, TBP was the most stable and YWHAZ was the second choice. GAPDH was the best performer only in 3D pellets with factors for AC and AF combined with CEP cells. RPL13A was the most stable only for AF with CEP cells at isolation. Our findings will be useful to properly design the experimental set-up of studies involving IVD, CEP or AC cells in different culture conditions, in order to obtain accurate and high quality data from quantitative gene expression analysis.

Ethical standards for orthopaedic surgeons.

This paper offers a summary of the ethical guide for the European orthopaedic community; the full report will be published in the EFORT Journal.

Anterior cervical fusion for radicular-disc conflict performed by three different procedures: clinical and radiographic analysis at long-term follow-up.

PURPOSE: Purpose of the study was to analyze in a retrospective way the clinical and radiographic outcome of three different surgical techniques in patients who underwent anterior cervical fusion. METHODS: Eighty-six patients affected by symptomatic cervical disc herniation or spondylosis underwent cervical anterior fusion. Patients were divided in three groups considering the surgical technique. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by Visual Analog Scale, Odom's criteria, Neck Disability Index. Radiographic evaluation included standard and functional X-rays. RESULTS: At 7 years mean follow-up, a comparable improvement in clinical symptoms was observed in all groups. Radiographic findings showed a solid fusion in all patients but seven cases in group 2 showed a subsidence of the cage. CONCLUSIONS: As shown by the obtained clinical and radiographic results, the anterior interbody fusion with stand-alone peek cage containing ß-tricalcium phosphate could be considered an effective and reliable procedure.

European multidisciplinary consensus statement on the use and monitoring of metal-on-metal bearings for total hip replacement and hip resurfacing.

INTRODUCTION: There is an ongoing debate about the optimal use of metal-on-metal (MoM) bearings in total hip replacement, since there are uncertainties about local and systemic adverse effects due to wear and corrosion of these bearings. Despite various national recommendations, efforts to achieve international harmonization of specific evidence-based recommendations for best practice are still lacking. HYPOTHESIS: An international consensus study group should be able to develop recommendations on the use and monitoring of MoM bearings, preferably at the European level, through a multidisciplinary approach, by integrating the perspectives of various stakeholders. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one experts representing three stakeholder groups and eight countries participated in this European consensus study, which consisted of a consensus meeting, subsequent structured discussion, and consensus voting. RESULTS: The current statement defines first of all benefits, local and systemic risks, as well as uncertain issues related to MoM bearings. Safety assessment after implantation of MoM comprises all patients. A closer follow-up is recommended for large head MoM (≥36mm) and resurfacing. In these implants basic follow-up should consist of x-rays and metal ion measurement of cobalt in whole blood, performed with GF-AAS or ICP-MS. Clinical and/or radiographic abnormality as well as elevated ion levels needs additional imaging (ultrasound, CT-scan and/or MARS-MRI). Cobalt values less than 2 µg/L are probably devoid of clinical concern, the threshold value for clinical concern is expected to be within the range of 2-7 µg/L. DISCUSSION: This is the first multinational, interdisciplinary, and multiprofessional approach for developing a recommendation for the use and monitoring of MoM bearings in total hip replacement. The current recommendations are in partial agreement with previous statements regarding the extent of follow-up and imaging techniques. They however differ from previous communications regarding measurement of metal ions and especially the investigated medium, technique, and eventual threshold levels. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, expert opinion/agreement conference.

Wagner's spherical periacetabular osteotomy: long term results.

Residual acetabular dysplasia leads to hip arthritis as a consequence of insufficient femoral head coverage which causes abnormal pressure on the joint cartilage. Spherical periacetabular osteotomy, described by H. Wagner, improves the acetabular coverage of the head. This surgical technique has been performed by the senior author, in Galeazzi Orthopaedic Institute of Milan, Italy since 1979. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiographic results of 14 patients affected by acetabular dysplasia and operated before 1985 by the same surgeon with this technique. The analysis of long term results (follow-up longer than 20 years) has shown that it is possible to achieve good clinical outcomes and to delay the need for total hip arthroplasty if a precise surgical technique is employed and if the correct indications are followed. Obese patients or hips with X-ray signs of osteoarthritis show the worst results in our experience. Our attitude is nowadays: full indication of spherical periacetabular osteotomy in dysplasia of the adolescent, indication in young adult patients only when some symptom is present, very rare indication in arthritis and only in very mild cases in young patients.

Abstracts from the ITALIAN HIP SOCIETY 2005 Annual Meeting.

none.

Femoral osteotomies.

none.