ABSTRACT
Background Among all the modalities of diagnostic radiology, ultrasonography is considered the least invasive one. However, this benefit usually comes at the cost of its subjective evaluation since it is purely a dynamic diagnostic modality. Thus, instead of ultrasonography, most clinicians usually rely on the report written by the radiologist. Objective The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical practices of ultrasound reporting of superficial soft tissue masses. Materials and methods A closed-loop retrospective and prospective study was conducted at the Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Jinnah Hospital, Lahore between December 2023 and March 2024. In the pre-intervention phase, a randomly collected sample of 100 ultrasound reports documenting superficial soft tissue masses were included in the study and judged against standard criteria set by the Royal College of Radiologists (RCR). The intervention phase included regular presentations, identification of problems, and designing of preformed reporting forms. Post-intervention assessments were based on the judgment of 100 ultrasound reports in each cycle twice. Intervention and post-intervention assessments were done twice to correct the ongoing practices. Results During the pre-intervention phase, the ultrasound reports issued by the department of study showed only 41.5% compliance with the RCR structured reporting guidelines. However, after the first and second post-intervention phases, this percentage increased up to 98.3%. Overall, we observed a compliance difference of 56.5% between the pre-intervention and second post-intervention phases. Conclusion Integration of methods, such as briefing the residents on RCR guidelines, displaying parameters, and making structured report templates available, can greatly increase adherence to RCR guidelines for structured ultrasonography reporting. It also greatly enhances the comprehensiveness and reliability of ultrasonography reports for clinicians. Clinical audits should be routinely practiced in the settings of radiology.
ABSTRACT
The human gastrointestinal tract (GIT) has a rich and pre-programmed microbiome. This microbiome is essential for physiological functions such as digestion, immunity, metabolism, and structural integrity, and of prime concern to us in conducting this study is the nervous system communication. This two-way communication between the GIT and central nervous system (CNS) is known as the gut-brain axis (GBA) and has implications for neurocritical disease. A change in any factor relating to this microbiome is known as gut dysbiosis; this can lead to aberrant communication through the GBA and in turn, can contribute to disease states. The primary objective of this study is to determine the cause-specific dysbiotic organisms in neuro-critically ill patients and their effects. We performed this study by searching published literature as per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies that defined gastrointestinal dysbiosis in neuro-critically ill patients were retrieved using Boolean search from 2000 to 2023 via PubMed and Google Scholar and narrowed the results down to five prospective case-control studies. We performed their quality assessment. The results concluded that in neurocritical illnesses such as encephalitis, brain tumors, intracerebral hemorrhage, and ischemic stroke, fluctuations in specific microbiota correlated with disease severity and prognosis. Moreover, the inhabiting population of dysbiotic organisms in neuro-critically ill patients were different in different diseases and there were no similarities in the composition of gut microbiota in these diseases. Taking stroke patients as an example; increased Enterobacteriaceae and lower Lachnospiraceae microbiome levels were found in patients with a higher stroke dysbiosis index (SDI). Those patients who developed stroke-associated pneumonia (SAP) displayed higher levels of Enterococcus species. In conclusion, dysbiosis has a major effect on neuro-critically ill patients' disease states and dysbiotic organisms can be used as a biomarker for disease. Further prospective studies on this topic are warranted for potential neurological and prognostic correlations.
ABSTRACT
Background The purpose of obtaining informed consent is to ensure that patients undergoing any medical or surgical intervention are neither deceived nor coerced. Accurately estimating surgical risks is critical for shared decision-making and informed consent. Probable complications and alternative procedures should be presented to the patient so that they can freely choose an operative option. However, this factor is difficult to carry on in emergencies where an urgent decision is required. Objective This study aimed to assess the ongoing clinical practices of informed consent in emergency surgeries at a tertiary care facility. Materials and methods A cross-sectional survey was carried out from March 2022 to June 2022 at the Department of General Surgery, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, with patients who had undergone surgical procedures under local, spinal, or general anesthesia within 24 hours of presentation. A Google Form (Google Inc., Mountainview, CA) was designed, containing a predefined set of 32 standard questions, and patients were interviewed in their native language to assess their satisfaction regarding the pattern and components of emergency informed consent. Categorical data were assessed using measures of central tendency, frequencies, and percentages. Results A total of 169 patients were selected for the study. Only 1.6% of them signed the consent form themselves, while 93.5% of the forms were signed by their first-degree relatives. Verbal consent was taken in 4.8% of cases. In 88% of cases, informed consent was obtained by the house surgeons. The majority of patients, i.e., 78.2%, were not able to read the written consent form; however, 83.1% understood the verbal information. About 66.3% of patients agreed that they were informed about the nature of their disease, while 67.5%, 14.8%, and 13.7% affirmed that they were explained the nature of surgical intervention, associated risks, and type of anesthesia, respectively. Overall, 59.5% of patients felt satisfied with the process of informed consent. About 91.1% of the patients believed that their decisions were unaffected by the procurement of informed consent. Conclusion The existing practices of informed consent and comprehension by the population were found to be substandard. Physicians seem to ignore bioethics, and patients appear to be unaware of their basic rights. Although practiced at our center, not all components of informed consent were communicated to the patients. The risks of the procedures and the mode of anesthesia used were not well addressed by doctors. There is a grave need to educate the medical community about the legal and ethical aspects of informed consent, as well as the public masses regarding their rights.
