Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35162471

ABSTRACT

Human papilloma virus (HPV) is the most common risk factor for cervical cancer. Cervical cancer can be prevented with vaccination and early screening methods using pap smears. However, the acceptance of these approaches can be affected by the awareness level of the population. This cross-sectional study aimed to assess knowledge and practices related to cervical cancer among women in the Al Madinah Province in Saudi Arabia. A total of 1489 responses were included in the analysis. The median awareness score related to cervical cancer was eight out of 20 points. Vaginal bleeding, dyspareunia, and leg pain were correctly identified by 79.8%, 43.7%, and 19.3% of the women, respectively. Thirty-four percent of the study sample knew that the sexually transmitted virus is a risk factor for cervical cancer. Only 44.6% were able to correctly identify pap smear as a screening tool, and 12.6% knew that there was a HPV vaccine. This study revealed a low to moderate awareness level toward cervical cancer, pap smear, and HPV vaccine. Thus, awareness campaigns are urgently needed to increase the awareness level for early detection and prevention of the disease.


Subject(s)
Papillomavirus Infections , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Papanicolaou Test , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Vaginal Smears
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34360475

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 was declared a pandemic by the WHO in March 2020. The most promising strategy to control the pandemic was to develop a vaccine. However, vaccination hesitancy is a major threat to world public health. Understanding the reasons behind this hesitancy might help in developing encouragement strategies. This cross-sectional study aimed to assess the knowledge and attitude toward the COVID-19 vaccine in Saudi Arabia. A total of 1599 responses were received; the overall vaccine acceptancy was 79.2%. Age, sex, and nationality of participants significantly predicted the vaccination status. A significantly higher proportion of participants, who reported being vaccinated, or intended to receive the vaccine, stated that the COVID-19 infection is dangerous, or varies from person to person; the vaccine is safe, and think there is a definite need for the vaccine (p < 0.001). The major encouragement factors to receive the vaccine were either confidence in the government decisions (54.8%), or the feeling of responsibility to stop the pandemic (48.7%), whereas the main discouraging factors were concerns about the insufficient clinical trials (11.4%), or the undiscovered side effects (11%). The results of this study indicate good acceptance toward the COVID-19 vaccine among residents of Saudi Arabia.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Saudi Arabia , Vaccination
3.
Neurosciences (Riyadh) ; 26(2): 134-140, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33551378

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess social awareness of ischemic stroke amongst Saudi citizens in Medina city. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study conducted between February and September 2019, we used a validated questionnaire to conduct face-to-face interviews and collect data, at 4 shopping malls and 5 supermarkets in Medina city, KSA. RESULTS: Five hundred and nineteen participants completed the questionnaire. Of the respondents, 57.4% correctly defined stroke, 42.6% correctly chose ≥2 stroke signs and made ≤one mistake, 23.1% knew of blood clot-dissolving drugs, 32.8% correctly identified ≥ 4 risk factors with ≤ one mistake, 85.93% knew that going to the Emergency Room (ER) was the correct action, and 35.84% identified ≥ 3 post-discharge requirements, with ≤one mistake. Most participants (65.77%) cited internet and social media as information sources. In the univariate comparison, older age (p<0.001) and family history of stroke (p=0.001) better predicted stroke knowledge. In a multivariate logistic regression, the only predictor for stroke recognition was the educational level. The gender and family history were predictors for stroke signs knowledge. Educational level and the family history of stroke were predictors for risk factors knowledge respectively. CONCLUSION: We observed a significant stroke knowledge deficit in our Saudi cohort, thus there is a need to increase public awareness about stroke risk factors, warning signs and emphasizing prevention approaches.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Ischemic Stroke/diagnosis , Adult , Aftercare , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Educational Status , Female , Humans , Ischemic Stroke/drug therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Saudi Arabia , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL